Introduction
In 1929, a surgical resident named Werner Forssmann in Germany performed the first right heart catheterization on a human by inserting a 65 cm urethral catheter into himself through his left antecubital vein. He then advanced it into the right atrium and administered drugs directly into the right heart chambers. Before that, Reverend Stephen Hale, an English Vicar, performed equine venous cannulation in the 1700s. The physiologist Claude Bernard performed equine jugular venous and carotid artery cannulation using glass tubes in 1844 to measure the temperature of both ventricles. Although it had been performed on animals in the past, this was the first time such a procedure had been attempted on a human.
This, in combination with x-ray imaging, gave rise to the concept of catheterization procedures that use catheters placed via the arteries or veins to image, diagnose, and treat conditions without the need for open surgery. Clinicians further advanced right heart catheterization techniques and catheter design. In New York, André Frédéric Cournand and Dickinson W Richards helped establish the foundation for modern central and peripheral catheterization procedures. Along with Werner Forssmann, they were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 1956 for their contributions.[1]
The right heart catheter was then used extensively to study cardiac and pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with chronic pulmonary disease and congenital heart disease. The catheter was referred to as a pulmonary artery catheter, as it was essential to measure cardiac output by sampling mixed venous blood from the pulmonary artery.[1] Dr Harold J Swan added a balloon to the catheter tip of a standard pulmonary catheter, allowing for bedside placement via flotation and an opportunity to continuously measure pressure in the right atrium and pulmonary arteries. Dr William Ganz developed the idea of using a thermistor at the tip, which allowed for direct cardiac output measurement using the thermodilution technique. Due to the widespread use of this catheter thereafter, the pulmonary artery catheter became commonly known as the "Swan-Ganz" catheter.[2][3]
Anatomy and Physiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Search engine and full access to all medical articles
10 free questions in your specialty
Free CME/CE Activities
Free daily question in your email
Save favorite articles to your dashboard
Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Anatomy and Physiology
Right heart catheterization is commonly performed by accessing the leg's common femoral vein, the neck's internal jugular vein, or the arm's antecubital veins. In the leg, the femoral vein becomes the external iliac vein and drains into the inferior vena cava, draining into the right atrium.[4] The cephalic vein in the arm drains into the subclavian vein, which then drains into the right atrium.[5] In the neck, the internal jugular vein joins the subclavian vein and forms the brachiocephalic vein. The brachiocephalic veins from both sides drain into the superior vena cava, which drains into the right atrium.[6] Antecubital venous access has been associated with shorter procedure time and lower chances of significant hematomas.[7]
Indications
The following are indications for right heart catheterization:
- Suspected cardiogenic shock
- Evaluation of a patient with dyspnea to diagnose or exclude pulmonary hypertension, constrictive pericardial disease, restrictive cardiomyopathy, and heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction
- Determine the response to vasodilator therapy in pulmonary hypertension
- Cardiac tamponade
- Intracardiac left-to-right shunt quantification
- Guiding fluid management and hemodynamic monitoring of patients after surgery or complicated myocardial infarction, heart failure, shock [8]
- Adult congenital heart disease
- Evaluation for cardiac transplantation
- Surveillance status postcardiac transplant
- Postcardiac transplant with new or worsening symptoms suggestive of graft rejection
- Preimplantation assessment of left ventricular assist devices
- Postimplantation optimization after left ventricular assist device placement
- In valve disease, when there are discrepancies between clinical presentation and noninvasive diagnostic testing [9][10][11][12][13]
Contraindications
Absolute contraindications include right-sided endocarditis, right-sided tumor, or thrombus. Relative contraindications include severe coagulopathy or bleeding diathesis. Appropriate caution should be exercised in the setting of arrhythmias, left bundle branch block, to avoid provoking dysrhythmias.[14]
Equipment
Several types of pulmonary artery catheters are commercially available. Some can be used to perform the thermodilution assessment of cardiac output in addition to pressure measurements. Catheters with a dedicated thermistor can be used to perform thermodilution cardiac output assessment. The pulmonary artery catheter is 110 cm in length, and catheter sizes vary, with French sizes ranging from 5F to 8F depending on the manufacturer. All catheters have a distal yellow port and a proximal blue port. The presence of a thermistor adds a third port to the catheter.[11]
Personnel
When the procedure is performed in the cardiac catheterization lab, there is a performing clinician, a nurse who can administer medications, and a monitoring technologist to record the data obtained. A cardiovascular technologist usually assists the performing clinician.[15]
Preparation
After obtaining informed consent, the patient is brought to the cardiac catheterization lab. The patient is placed in the supine position on the table, and the access sites are cleaned and draped in a sterile fashion. For providing a sterile access site, chlorhexidine is used. The operating physician and the assistant will require sterile gowns, gloves, head caps, and facial protection. The needles, access sheaths, and catheters are flushed to prevent the introduction of air into the systemic circulation.[14]
Technique or Treatment
A local anesthetic is administered subcutaneously at the site of access. Venous access is obtained with or without ultrasound guidance. In the femoral and jugular sites, access can be obtained using a standard 18-gauge needle or a smaller 21-gauge needle. In the case of the antecubital vein, using the 21-gauge needle may reduce the chances of injury to nearby arterial structures. Ultrasound guidance requires a sterile ultrasound probe sleeve to prevent contaminating the rest of the sterile field.
Once venous access is obtained, an appropriately sized sheath is secured in the vein. The pulmonary artery catheter is advanced through the sheath into the vein. The balloon is inflated after the catheter is advanced to roughly 15 cm to avoid inflating it within the access sheath. Balloon inflation will make advancing the catheter to the right atrium much easier. If the catheter advances easily, wire cannulation is not necessary. The catheter will reach the right atrium from the internal jugular vein when it is advanced to roughly 20 cm. From the femoral venous access site, the catheter will reach the right atrium when advanced to approximately 45 cm in length. Nonetheless, the catheter movement can also be observed using fluoroscopy.
A pulsatile right atrial waveform will be observed when the catheter reaches the right atrium. Before recording pressures, the system is zeroed to establish a reference; zeroing involves opening the air-fluid transducer to air to equilibrate with atmospheric pressure. When this is being performed, the air-fluid transducer must be at the level of the heart. Roughly, this is performed by holding the air-fluid transducer at the level of the fourth intercostal space, at an imaginary plane between the anterior and the posterior chest walls. Observed pressures may be falsely elevated if the transducer is positioned below heart level and falsely decreased if the transducer is above heart level.
Once the right atrial pressure waveform is obtained, the catheter is manipulated to direct it towards the right ventricle, and right ventricular pressure is recorded. Following this, the catheter is usually advanced to a wedge position to measure the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. Once this is completed, the balloon can be deflated and brought back a few cms into the pulmonary artery, where pulmonary artery pressure can be recorded.
Importantly, all pressures should be measured ideally at end-expiration. The pulmonary artery blood sample is withdrawn using the distal yellow port, and mixed venous oxygen saturation is obtained. Arterial saturation must be obtained separately to determine cardiac output using the Fick method. Thermodilution can be performed by injecting cold saline into the proximal blue port into the right atrium, where it mixes with blood, and a thermistor detects the temperature difference. Thermodilution has been repeated a minimum of 3 times to obtain an average cardiac output and index. The pulmonary artery catheter can be manipulated and placed in the superior or inferior vena cava to withdraw blood samples and estimate oxygen saturations. The same can be done in the right ventricle or the right atrium.[11][12]
Complications
Possible complications include ventricular arrhythmias and right bundle branch block, which are usually transient and resolve once the catheter is removed or the catheter tip position is adjusted. Very rarely, a complete heart block in the setting of a prior left bundle branch block can occur, which may require temporary pacemaker placement. Air embolism can occur if there is air in the catheters or the fluid-filled pressure transducers. The patient can manifest with the sudden onset of chest pain, dyspnea, hypotension, and tachycardia. If this is suspected, the patient should be placed in the Trendelenburg position, and high-flow oxygen must be administered; this helps reduce the nitrogen in the blood and promotes the reabsorption of the injected air. In some situations, hyperbaric oxygen therapy is required.
The rate of pulmonary artery perforation is 0.03%, which can occur in the setting of prolonged balloon inflation and distal placement of the catheter into the pulmonary arteries for wedge pressure measurement, particularly in patients with prior pulmonary hypertension and systemic anticoagulation. This can manifest as sudden dyspnea and cardiogenic shock. Fluoroscopy can help identify if the tip of the catheter is very distal in the pulmonary artery branches. If this occurs, the catheter should be left in place with the balloon inflated to minimize pulmonary hemorrhage. The patient should be emergently intubated with a double-lumen endotracheal tube and placed in the lateral decubitus position with the affected side down to protect the unaffected side from the ongoing hemorrhage. Emergent surgery or embolization should be considered. The potential complications for indwelling pulmonary artery catheters include access site infection, pulmonary infarction, right-sided chamber or pulmonary artery perforation, arrhythmias, and thrombosis of the accessed vein.[14]
Clinical Significance
Various pressure measurements and hemodynamic parameters can be obtained during a right heart catheterization. The common parameters evaluated, along with the hemodynamic profiles of commonly encountered scenarios, are described in the following sections. The normal mean right atrial pressure ranges from 1 to 5 mm Hg. Normal right ventricular systolic and diastolic pressures are 15 to 30 mm Hg and 1 to 7 mm Hg, respectively. Normal pulmonary artery systolic and diastolic pressures are 15 to 30 mm Hg and 4 to 12 mm Hg, respectively. The mean pulmonary artery pressure is typically around 15 mm Hg. Normal pulmonary capillary wedge pressure is 4 to 12 mm Hg.[14] The measured pressures can be used to calculate cardiac output, cardiac index, pulmonary vascular resistance, systemic vascular resistance, stroke work index, right ventricular stroke work, pulmonary artery pulsatility index, the Gorlin equation to calculate mitral and aortic valve areas, and the Hakki equation to calculate aortic valve area.[12][16]
Right Atrial or Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure Waveforms
The right atrial pressure waveform consists of 3 positive upstrokes and 2 descents. The first positive upstroke is the “a” wave that correlates with atrial systole. This is followed by the “x” descent that signifies atrial relaxation. The next wave is the “c” wave, which indicates tricuspid valve closure. The next wave is a positive upstroke “v” wave representing passive atrial filling during right ventricular contraction. The “v” wave is followed by the ‘y” descent, representing atrial emptying after the tricuspid valve opens in ventricular diastole. The pulmonary capillary wedge waveform is similar to the right atrial pressure waveform and consists of 3 positive upstrokes and 2 downstrokes.[14]
In the setting of atrial fibrillation, there is a loss of the “a” wave due to the loss of the atrial contribution to the waveform. Tall “a” waves can occur due to an increase in atrial pressure that can occur in tricuspid or mitral stenosis. Cannon “a” waves are very large “a” waves that are caused by any condition that can cause atrioventricular dissociation, such as complete heart block, ventricular tachycardia, and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Large “v” waves occur due to increased ventricular volume during right ventricular contraction, like tricuspid or mitral regurgitation, right or left ventricular failure, severe noncompliance of the right or left ventricle, or a ventricular septal defect.
Also, mitral stenosis, postoperative or rheumatic atrium changes, can produce large atrial “v” waves.[17] A very rapid “y” descent is due to rapid diastolic filling of the ventricle that can occur in constrictive pericarditis. Similarly, a rapid “x” descent occurs in constrictive pericarditis.[18] The “y” descent is absent in cardiac tamponade as there is an equalization of diastolic pressures, and the ventricular diastolic pressure does not fall enough to allow for complete diastolic filling.[12]
Right Ventricle Systolic and Diastolic Pressures
Right ventricular and pulmonary artery systolic pressures are elevated in pulmonary embolism and pulmonary hypertension.[19][20] Constrictive pericarditis, restrictive cardiomyopathy, and cardiac tamponade cause increased and equalized end-diastolic pressures, as well as elevated pulmonary capillary wedge pressures. However, in constrictive pericarditis, ventricular interdependence is best identified by simultaneous right and left heart catheterization. Interdependence results in discordance between right and left ventricular pressures, as evidenced by a reduction in the right ventricular systolic pressure tracing when left ventricular pressure increases, and vice versa, with respiration.
In restrictive cardiomyopathy, there is no interdependence; therefore, there is a concordance of right and left ventricular pressures on simultaneous measurement. Concordance is evidenced by concordant right ventricle and left ventricle systolic pressure tracings with respiration. This is mathematically calculated as the systolic area index, which is defined as the ratio of the right ventricle to the left ventricle area in inspiration versus expiration. A systolic area index greater than 1.1 has a greater than 95% sensitivity in identifying constrictive pericarditis. Even though various parameters have been developed to distinguish between constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy, the systolic area index appears to have the best predictive accuracy. While the clinical presentation of constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy is mostly chronic, cardiac tamponade physiology is frequently acute.[18][21]
Cardiac Output
As measured by right heart catheterization, cardiac output is typically calculated using the indirect Fick principle and the thermodilution technique. Adolf Fick developed the Fick principle in 1870, observing that the blood volume required to transport that amount of oxygen could be calculated by measuring the amount of oxygen carried in the systemic and pulmonary circulation. This method requires the following parameters: hemoglobin levels, central arterial and venous oxygen saturation, and maximum oxygen consumption values. The maximum oxygen consumption is assumed to be 250 mL/minute, or 125 mL/min/method involves directly measuring oxygen consumption using exhaled air. This is cumbersome and requires specialized equipment. Therefore, the indirect Fick method, which uses the assumed maximum oxygen consumption value, is widely used. However, it has been shown that cardiac output derived by the indirect Fick method varies from that derived by the direct Fick method by roughly 25% in up to 25% of individuals. These differences appear more pronounced in individuals with a body mass index greater than 40 kg/m².[22][23][24]
For thermodilution, 10 cc of saline is injected using the proximal blue port of the pulmonary artery catheter. This mixes with the right atrial blood and causes a slight drop in temperature, which is then detected by the thermistor at the tip of the catheter. However, there are pitfalls to the thermodilution technique. The thermodilution technique is unreliable when cardiac output is low, as the reduced area under the curve may cause an underestimation of output. Severe tricuspid or pulmonic valve regurgitation leads to blood recirculation, resulting in falsely low cardiac output measurements. Conversely, intracardiac shunts can cause overestimation by altering indicator dilution. Clinicians should interpret thermodilution data cautiously in these conditions and consider alternative assessment methods when necessary. Clinicians must also be aware of the pitfalls associated with these measurements, as Fick and thermodilution techniques can yield variable results for the same patient.[12][24]
Cardiac Index
The cardiac index is calculated by indexing the cardiac output for body surface area. Normal cardiac output can be variable based on body mass and size. However, a normal cardiac index is greater than 2.5 L/min/m². Cardiogenic shock is an index of less than 2.2 L/min/m² with a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure greater than 15 mm Hg.[25][26]
Cardiac Power Index
Cardiac power output is calculated in Watts and is obtained by dividing the product of mean arterial pressure and cardiac output in liters per minute by 451. The cardiac power index is the cardiac power output indexed to the body's surface area. Cardiac power output of less than 0.6 W strongly correlates with in-hospital mortality in patients with shock. In cardiogenic shock, cardiac power output correlates more with adverse outcomes than cardiac index, ejection fraction, pulmonary artery systolic pressure, and mean arterial pressure.[27]
Systemic and Pulmonary Vascular Resistance
The following equation calculates systemic vascular resistance:
- (Mean arterial pressure – right atrial pressure) x 80 / cardiac output
Systemic vascular resistance is measured in Wood units (WU) or dynes/second/cm². The normal range is 700 to 1600 dynes/second/cm or 10 to 20 WU.
Similarly, pulmonary vascular resistance is calculated by the equation:
- (Mean pulmonary artery pressure – pulmonary capillary wedge pressure) x 80/ cardiac output
Pulmonary vascular resistance is measured in WU or dynes per second per cm². The normal range is 20 to 120 dynes/second/cm or less than 2 WU.[12]
Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index
The pulmonary artery pulsatility index is the ratio of pulmonary artery pressure to right atrial pressure and is calculated by the following equation:
- (Systolic pulmonary artery pressure – diastolic pulmonary artery pressure)/right atrial pressure
A pulmonary artery pulsatility index of less than 0.9 has very high sensitivity and specificity in predicting right ventricular failure and in-hospital mortality in acute inferior wall myocardial infarction.[16] A pulmonary artery pulsatility index of less than 1.85 is also used to predict if patients will experience right ventricular failure and thereby require right ventricular hemodynamic device support after placement of left ventricular assist devices.[28][29] This measurement is also used to predict adverse outcomes in patients with chronic right heart failure.[30]
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
Right heart cardiac catheterization is a vital diagnostic procedure used to evaluate hemodynamics in patients with suspected or known pulmonary hypertension, heart failure, valvular disease, or congenital heart anomalies. Physicians and advanced practitioners performing the procedure must have technical proficiency in catheter manipulation, waveform interpretation, and pressure measurement across cardiac chambers and the pulmonary artery. Accurate data collection is crucial for informing treatment decisions, such as initiating or adjusting pulmonary vasodilator therapy or assessing transplant candidacy. A systematic strategy includes proper patient selection, adherence to sterile technique, real-time monitoring, and the ability to recognize and manage potential complications, such as arrhythmias or vascular injury.
Effective interprofessional communication and care coordination significantly improve patient safety and outcomes during right heart catheterization. Nurses are crucial in preprocedure education, intravenous access, patient monitoring, and post-procedure observation for potential complications. Pharmacists support using sedatives, anticoagulants, and pulmonary vasodilators safely and effectively during vasoreactivity testing. Respiratory therapists may assist in monitoring oxygenation and ventilatory support, particularly in those who are critically ill. Clear communication among team members ensures timely documentation, patient handoffs, and adherence to clinical protocols. This collaborative approach fosters a patient-centered experience, minimizes procedural risks, and enhances diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic outcomes.
Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Monitoring
Right heart catheterization appears to be generally performed in patients with cardiac and pulmonary disorders. These patients receive multidisciplinary care from their primary care physicians, pulmonologists, and cardiologists. Conditions that could be appropriately diagnosed or excluded by right heart catheterization must be recognized.
Additionally, the optimal performance of these procedures relies on the entire team, including the nurse and cardiovascular technologists, to ensure safety against potential risks and complications of the procedure. Identifying potential issues with the fluid-filled transducer system and recognizing abnormal waveforms due to technical problems is crucial for right heart catheterization. The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions has developed best practice guidelines for cardiac catheterization procedures, which help adhere to national and international standards.
References
Nossaman BD, Scruggs BA, Nossaman VE, Murthy SN, Kadowitz PJ. History of right heart catheterization: 100 years of experimentation and methodology development. Cardiology in review. 2010 Mar-Apr:18(2):94-101. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0b013e3181ceff67. Epub [PubMed PMID: 20160536]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceSwan HJ, Ganz W, Forrester J, Marcus H, Diamond G, Chonette D. Catheterization of the heart in man with use of a flow-directed balloon-tipped catheter. The New England journal of medicine. 1970 Aug 27:283(9):447-51 [PubMed PMID: 5434111]
Forrester JS. A Tale of Serendipity, Ingenuity, and Chance: 50th Anniversary of Creation of the Swan-Ganz Catheter. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2019 Jul 9:74(1):100-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.050. Epub [PubMed PMID: 31272535]
Dao DPD, Le PH. Anatomy, Abdomen and Pelvis: Veins. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 32119461]
Nguyen JD, Duong H. Anatomy, Shoulder and Upper Limb, Veins. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 31536282]
Rivard AB, Kortz MW, Burns B. Anatomy, Head and Neck: Internal Jugular Vein. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:(): [PubMed PMID: 30020630]
Roule V, Ailem S, Legallois D, Dahdouh Z, Lognoné T, Bergot E, Grollier G, Milliez P, Sabatier R, Beygui F. Antecubital vs Femoral Venous Access for Right Heart Catheterization: Benefits of a Flashback. The Canadian journal of cardiology. 2015 Dec:31(12):1497.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2015.04.026. Epub 2015 Apr 30 [PubMed PMID: 26277087]
Saxena A, Garan AR, Kapur NK, O'Neill WW, Lindenfeld J, Pinney SP, Uriel N, Burkhoff D, Kern M. Value of Hemodynamic Monitoring in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support. Circulation. 2020 Apr 7:141(14):1184-1197. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043080. Epub 2020 Apr 6 [PubMed PMID: 32250695]
Lim HS, Hsich E, Shah KB. International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation position statement on the role of right heart catheterization in the management of heart transplant recipients. The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation. 2019 Mar:38(3):235-238. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.12.009. Epub 2018 Dec 21 [PubMed PMID: 30638836]
Patel MR, Bailey SR, Bonow RO, Chambers CE, Chan PS, Dehmer GJ, Kirtane AJ, Wann LS, Ward RP. ACCF/SCAI/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HFSA/HRS/SCCM/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2012 appropriate use criteria for diagnostic catheterization: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012 May 29:59(22):1995-2027. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.003. Epub 2012 May 9 [PubMed PMID: 22578925]
Krishnan A, Markham R, Savage M, Wong YW, Walters D. Right Heart Catheterisation: How To Do It. Heart, lung & circulation. 2019 Apr:28(4):e71-e78. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Sep 6 [PubMed PMID: 30253970]
Bangalore S, Bhatt DL. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Right heart catheterization, coronary angiography, and percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation. 2011 Oct 25:124(17):e428-33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.065219. Epub [PubMed PMID: 22025641]
Sorajja P, Borlaug BA, Dimas VV, Fang JC, Forfia PR, Givertz MM, Kapur NK, Kern MJ, Naidu SS. SCAI/HFSA clinical expert consensus document on the use of invasive hemodynamics for the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular disease. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2017 Jun 1:89(7):E233-E247. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26888. Epub 2017 May 10 [PubMed PMID: 28489331]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceKelly CR, Rabbani LE. Videos in clinical medicine. Pulmonary-artery catheterization. The New England journal of medicine. 2013 Dec 19:369(25):e35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMvcm1212416. Epub [PubMed PMID: 24350972]
Naidu SS, Aronow HD, Box LC, Duffy PL, Kolansky DM, Kupfer JM, Latif F, Mulukutla SR, Rao SV, Swaminathan RV, Blankenship JC. SCAI expert consensus statement: 2016 best practices in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: (Endorsed by the cardiological society of india, and sociedad Latino Americana de Cardiologia intervencionista; Affirmation of value by the Canadian Association of interventional cardiology-Association canadienne de cardiologie d'intervention). Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2016 Sep:88(3):407-23. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26551. Epub 2016 May 2 [PubMed PMID: 27137680]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceKorabathina R, Heffernan KS, Paruchuri V, Patel AR, Mudd JO, Prutkin JM, Orr NM, Weintraub A, Kimmelstiel CD, Kapur NK. The pulmonary artery pulsatility index identifies severe right ventricular dysfunction in acute inferior myocardial infarction. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2012 Oct 1:80(4):593-600. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23309. Epub 2012 Jan 10 [PubMed PMID: 21954053]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceKern MJ, Deligonul U. Interpretation of cardiac pathophysiology from pressure waveform analysis: the left-sided V wave. Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis. 1991 Jul:23(3):211-8 [PubMed PMID: 1868538]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceGeske JB, Anavekar NS, Nishimura RA, Oh JK, Gersh BJ. Differentiation of Constriction and Restriction: Complex Cardiovascular Hemodynamics. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2016 Nov 29:68(21):2329-2347. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.08.050. Epub [PubMed PMID: 27884252]
Raina A, Abraham WT, Adamson PB, Bauman J, Benza RL. Limitations of right heart catheterization in the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with pulmonary hypertension related to left heart disease: insights from a wireless pulmonary artery pressure monitoring system. The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation. 2015 Mar:34(3):438-47. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.01.983. Epub 2015 Feb 7 [PubMed PMID: 25813770]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceBryce YC, Perez-Johnston R, Bryce EB, Homayoon B, Santos-Martin EG. Pathophysiology of right ventricular failure in acute pulmonary embolism and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a pictorial essay for the interventional radiologist. Insights into imaging. 2019 Feb 13:10(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13244-019-0695-9. Epub 2019 Feb 13 [PubMed PMID: 30758687]
Talreja DR, Nishimura RA, Oh JK, Holmes DR. Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: novel criteria for diagnosis in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2008 Jan 22:51(3):315-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.039. Epub [PubMed PMID: 18206742]
Rosenkranz S, Preston IR. Right heart catheterisation: best practice and pitfalls in pulmonary hypertension. European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society. 2015 Dec:24(138):642-52. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0062-2015. Epub [PubMed PMID: 26621978]
Narang N, Thibodeau JT, Levine BD, Gore MO, Ayers CR, Lange RA, Cigarroa JE, Turer AT, de Lemos JA, McGuire DK. Inaccuracy of estimated resting oxygen uptake in the clinical setting. Circulation. 2014 Jan 14:129(2):203-10. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.003334. Epub 2013 Sep 27 [PubMed PMID: 24077170]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceArgueta EE, Paniagua D. Thermodilution Cardiac Output: A Concept Over 250 Years in the Making. Cardiology in review. 2019 May/Jun:27(3):138-144. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000223. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30946701]
Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, Sanborn TA, White HD, Talley JD, Buller CE, Jacobs AK, Slater JN, Col J, McKinlay SM, LeJemtel TH. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. The New England journal of medicine. 1999 Aug 26:341(9):625-34 [PubMed PMID: 10460813]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceWayangankar SA, Bangalore S, McCoy LA, Jneid H, Latif F, Karrowni W, Charitakis K, Feldman DN, Dakik HA, Mauri L, Peterson ED, Messenger J, Roe M, Mukherjee D, Klein A. Temporal Trends and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Cardiogenic Shock in the Setting of Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Report From the CathPCI Registry. JACC. Cardiovascular interventions. 2016 Feb 22:9(4):341-351. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.039. Epub 2016 Jan 20 [PubMed PMID: 26803418]
Fincke R, Hochman JS, Lowe AM, Menon V, Slater JN, Webb JG, LeJemtel TH, Cotter G, SHOCK Investigators. Cardiac power is the strongest hemodynamic correlate of mortality in cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK trial registry. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2004 Jul 21:44(2):340-8 [PubMed PMID: 15261929]
Zeymer U, Bueno H, Granger CB, Hochman J, Huber K, Lettino M, Price S, Schiele F, Tubaro M, Vranckx P, Zahger D, Thiele H. Acute Cardiovascular Care Association position statement for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A document of the Acute Cardiovascular Care Association of the European Society of Cardiology. European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care. 2020 Mar:9(2):183-197. doi: 10.1177/2048872619894254. Epub 2020 Mar 2 [PubMed PMID: 32114774]
Morine KJ, Kiernan MS, Pham DT, Paruchuri V, Denofrio D, Kapur NK. Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index Is Associated With Right Ventricular Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Surgery. Journal of cardiac failure. 2016 Feb:22(2):110-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2015.10.019. Epub 2015 Nov 10 [PubMed PMID: 26564619]
Kochav SM, Flores RJ, Truby LK, Topkara VK. Prognostic Impact of Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index (PAPi) in Patients With Advanced Heart Failure: Insights From the ESCAPE Trial. Journal of cardiac failure. 2018 Jul:24(7):453-459. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Mar 27 [PubMed PMID: 29597051]