Back To Search Results

Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks

Editor: Kevin C. King Updated: 7/6/2025 3:01:02 PM

Introduction

One of the most difficult challenges for any prescriber is distinguishing between the legitimate prescription of controlled substances and the prescription that may be used for illegitimate purposes. To discern the difference, prescribers need to understand the signs, symptoms, and treatment of acute and chronic pain and the signs and symptoms of patients misusing controlled substances.[1][2]

Pain relief remains one of the most common reasons patients seek medical attention. Although many categories of pain medications are available, opioid analgesics are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for moderate-to-severe pain. As such, they are a common choice for patients with acute, cancer-related, neurologic, and end-of-life pain. Prescribing opioid analgesics for chronic pain is controversial and fraught with inconclusive standards.

In the 1990s, the chronic failure of health professionals to treat severe pain appropriately led to an expansion in opioid analgesic prescribing. Unfortunately, this resulted in increased overuse, diversion of drugs, opioid use disorder, and overdose. The Catch-22 is that health professionals either undertreat patients, leading to unnecessary suffering, or overtreat them, which can cause adverse effects such as increased risk of opioid analgesic use disorder and potential overdose.

Opioid analgesic prescribing reached its highest point in 2011. Since then, both prescribing and overdose have been declining. However, as a society, in both the lay and scientific literature, there are significant concerns that we are still in the middle of an opioid crisis.[3]

One of the biggest challenges in caring for patients with pain is their varying tolerance levels, which necessitate different opioid doses to achieve adequate pain relief. Patients may exhibit a wide range of behavioral, cultural, emotional, and psychological responses to pain compared to those with a substance use disorder; often, distinguishing between the two can be challenging. All healthcare professionals engaged in pain control need an understanding of the treatment recommendations and safety concerns in prescribing opioid analgesics. Appropriate opioid prescribing requires a thorough patient assessment, short- and long-term treatment planning, close follow-up, and continued monitoring. All healthcare providers need to be aware of appropriate patient assessment, treatment planning, and the potential for substance use disorder, drug diversion, and hazardous behavioral responses to controlled substances, such as opioid analgesics, which differ from pseudoaddiction and physical dependence.

Many clinicians have limited knowledge of opioid use disorder. They often fail to recognize it as a disease and mistakenly believe that opioid dependence is the same as opioid use disorder. A lack of clear understanding can lead to confusion between patients with chronic non-use disorder and those misusing their prescribed opioids. A lack of training and educational deficits often interfere with the appropriate prescription of opioid analgesic agents. To prevent the misuse of controlled substances, healthcare providers who prescribe controlled substances should learn prescribing practices that minimize or prevent adverse consequences.[4]

Definitions

  • Addiction: According to the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM), addiction is a primary, chronic disease of brain reward, motivation, memory, and related circuitry. Dysfunction in these circuits leads to characteristic biological, psychological, social, and spiritual manifestations. This dysfunction is reflected in an individual pathologically pursuing reward or relief through substance use and other behaviors. Addiction is now termed substance use disorder and is characterized by an inability to consistently abstain, cravings for the drug, impairment in behavioral control, diminished ability to recognize significant problems with one's behaviors and interpersonal relationships, and a dysfunctional emotional response. Like other chronic diseases, substance use disorder often involves cycles of relapse and remission. Without treatment or engagement in recovery activities, substance use disorder is progressive and can result in disability or premature death.[5] 
  • Appropriate opioid analgesic prescribing: This involves providing pain control while minimizing toxicity, substance use disorder, or the risk of substance use disorder and implementing safeguards to reduce drug diversion.
  • Inappropriate opioid analgesic prescribing: Non-prescribing, inadequate prescribing, excessive prescribing, or continued prescribing despite evidence of the lack of effective opioid analgesic treatment.
  • Controlled substances: These substances are drugs or medications that possess the potential for being misused and are considered to be substances that have a substantially high risk of resulting in substance use disorder.
  • Opioid analgesics: These drugs dull the senses and relieve pain, such as morphine. In addition, these medications may induce sleep. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA, USA) uses the term narcotic to refer to drugs that are opioid analgesics.

Characteristics of Addiction or Substance Use Disorder

  • Craving for drugs or rewards
  • Diminished recognition of significant problems in behavior
  • Dysfunctional emotional response
  • Impairment in behavioral control
  • Inability to consistently abstain 

Drug Schedules of Controlled Substances

All healthcare providers should be familiar with the guidelines and laws for each schedule, which are based on the purpose of the drug and the risk of substance use disorder. In the United States, controlled substances are subject to strict regulation by both federal and state laws that govern their manufacture and distribution. Controlled substances have a high risk of resulting in addiction and substance use disorder. As the schedules decrease from I to V, the drugs listed within each category have a lower potential to cause a substance use or addiction disorder.

Controlled Substances Act

In the United States, the Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act was passed in 1970 and included the Controlled Substances Act. The Controlled Substances Act covers various aspects of drugs as follows:

  • Classification and regulation of drugs, according to their content and purpose
  • Manufacturing of drugs
  • Distribution of drugs
  • Exportation and sale of drugs

The Controlled Substances Act established 5 drug schedules to regulate the manufacture and distribution of controlled substances. As part of the regulation, healthcare providers who prescribe controlled substances and pharmacists who fill these prescriptions must obtain a license from the DEA. These licenses include specific license numbers allowing controlled substance prescriptions to be tracked and linked to a specific healthcare provider or distributor.

These schedules categorize substances based on their medical value, risk of addiction, and potential to cause harm. The schedules range from Schedule I, which has the highest potential for addiction and substance use disorder, to Schedule V, which has the lowest potential for addiction and substance use disorder.

Schedule I

  • Schedule I drugs possess the highest potential for substance use disorder and misuse. These drugs have no medical use and are illicit or street drugs.
  • Examples of Schedule I drugs include heroin, lysergic acid diethylamide, mescaline, methylenedioxymethamphetamine, and methaqualone.
  • Marijuana, which is legal in some states, is still classified as a Schedule I drug at the federal level as of this writing.

Schedule II

  • Schedule II drugs have a reduced potential for substance use disorder compared to Schedule I. These drugs are at high risk for both physical and psychological dependence. These drugs have a high capacity for both substance use disorder and misuse. Schedule II drugs are typically prescribed to treat severe pain, anxiety, insomnia, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.
  • Examples of Schedule II substances include fentanyl, hydromorphone, meperidine, methadone, morphine, oxycodone, dextroamphetamine, methylphenidate, methamphetamine, pentobarbital, and secobarbital.
  • These drugs were previously prescribed only through a paper prescription, but they are now permitted to be transmitted electronically through Electronic Prescriptions for Controlled Substances (EPCS).
  • No refills are allowed. 
  • Schedule II drugs have the tightest regulations compared to other prescription drugs.

Schedule III

  • Schedule III drugs have a lower misuse potential compared to Schedule I and II drugs. These drugs may cause physical dependence but more commonly lead to psychological dependence. Medications in this category are often used for pain control, anesthesia, or appetite suppression.
  • Examples of Schedule III substances include benzphetamine, ketamine, phendimetrazine, and anabolic steroids.
  • Opioid analgesics in this schedule include products containing not more than 90 mg of codeine per dosage unit and buprenorphine.
  • Schedule III drugs may be prescribed verbally over the phone, with a paper prescription, or through EPCS.
  • Within a 6-month timeframe, refill requirements are such that the drug can only have 5 refills. 

Schedule IV

  • Schedule IV drugs have a lower potential for misuse compared to Schedule I, II, or III drugs. These drugs have a limited risk of physical or psychological dependence.
  • Examples of Schedule IV substances include alprazolam, carisoprodol, clonazepam, clorazepate, diazepam, lorazepam, midazolam, temazepam, tramadol, and triazolam.
  • Drugs in this class may be used for pain control as long as the healthcare provider deems the drug medically necessary and the patient is likely to benefit.
  • Schedule IV drugs can be prescribed verbally over the phone, with a paper prescription, or through EPCS.
  • Refills are permitted up to 5 times in a 6-month timeframe from the issuance date.

Schedule V

  • Schedule V drugs are the least likely of the controlled substances to be misused. These drugs result in minimal physical or psychological dependence.
  • Examples include cough medicines containing codeine, antidiarrheal medications containing atropine or diphenoxylate, pregabalin, and ezogabine.
  • Despite their low abuse potential, they still need to be managed appropriately and administered with care.
  • When these medicines contain codeine, they must have less than 200 mg of codeine per 100 mL.
  • Partial prescription fills cannot occur more than 6 months after the issue date. When a partial fill occurs, it is treated in the same manner and with the same rules as a refill of the drug.

Drug Use Disorder, Abuse, and Misuse

Drug use disorder differs from drug abuse and misuse.

Drugs taken may be illicit street drugs, stolen drugs, or those obtained through a legal prescription. Misusing a drug typically involves taking the drug in a harmful or detrimental way, resulting in personal, professional, or social problems. A patient abusing an opioid analgesic may no longer be able to interact appropriately with their family or friends and perform their duties at work.

Misuse of a controlled substance refers to using a prescribed drug in a way that was not intended, whether intentionally or accidentally. A negative result may or may not occur. Examples of misuse include taking too much of a drug, using an incorrect dose, an incorrect route, or using prescription drugs written for another person.

Controlled substances include both prescription drugs and illicit drugs with no recognized medical value. Both categories have the potential to be abused or misused. Although the use of Schedule I drugs is illegal, prescription drugs found in Schedules II through V are also commonly abused and misused, and their misuse is a challenging problem that has increased over the last several years.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has declared prescription drug abuse a problem of epidemic proportions. The CDC believes that the absence of checks and balances on the prescription and distribution of controlled substances, including those prescribed for medical use, has the potential for abuse, and misuse is likely to continue increasing.

Prescriber Shopping

A common practice among individuals who intentionally misuse controlled substances is to seek multiple sources for drugs. These individuals visit different healthcare providers, presenting a list of complaints that are often fictitious and vary from one healthcare provider to another. As a result, they may be able to obtain multiple prescriptions, which they then fill at different pharmacies. To combat this practice, known as prescriber shopping, many states have implemented systems that enable healthcare providers to view all the prescriptions written for each patient. The use of these systems is helping to gradually reduce such misuse.[6]

Diversion

Some prescription drugs can be sold on the street for as much as $50 per tablet. Diversion is when a patient sells their drugs as a method of earning money. Patients may also sell their drugs to buy food, pay expenses, or purchase more potent street drugs. In some worst cases, healthcare providers may divert drugs from patients for their personal use or sell them to others.

Some individuals use controlled substances for purposes other than their intended medical use. Rather than pain control, they may be used to stay awake, induce sleep, or get high. Before the popularity of prescription drug diversion, the only method to obtain illicit drugs was to import from other countries or manufacture them in private labs. Today, law enforcement agencies have the tremendous challenge of dealing with prescription drugs sold by diversion and illicit drugs imported or manufactured. In both instances, these drug sales and usage result in increased criminal activity, dangerous overdoses, and death. 

Methods of Obtaining Prescription Drugs

A review of multiple studies highlights a variety of ways individuals obtain prescription drugs. The findings are summarized below:

  • 55% free from a friend or relative
  • 20% from a prescriber
  • 10% purchased from a friend or relative
  • 5% stolen from a friend or relative
  • 5% purchased from a drug dealer
  • 2% from multiple doctors
  • 1% through theft from a medical practice or pharmacy
  • Less than 1% obtained them from the internet

Studies also reveal that the source of the majority of these drugs was a single legal prescriber.

Opioid Knowledge Deficit Among Healthcare Providers

There are significant knowledge gaps regarding appropriate and inappropriate opioid analgesic prescribing, including a lack of understanding of current research, legislation, and proper prescribing practices. Healthcare providers often have knowledge deficits that include:

  • Understanding of addiction
  • At-risk opioid addiction populations
  • Prescription versus non-prescription opioid addiction
  • The belief that addiction and dependence on opioids are synonymous
  • The belief that opioid addiction is a psychological problem instead of a chronic painful disease

Due to a long history of misunderstanding, poor society, insufficient education for healthcare providers, and inconsistent laws, prescribing opioids has resulted in significant societal challenges. These challenges can only be addressed through comprehensive education and training.

Misuse of Controlled Substances

The misuse of controlled substances resulting in morbidity and mortality is rampant.[7] According to the 2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health conducted by the United States Department of Health and Human Services, over 10 million people misuse prescription pain medications, and over 2 million misuse sedatives, stimulants, and tranquilizers each year. The survey also identified pain relief as the most common reason for misuse. The CDC estimates that more than 40,000 individuals die each year from an opioid overdose. 

Controlled Substances

Three major classes of controlled substances are frequently misused—opioids, depressants, and stimulants.

Opioids: Opioids are commonly prescribed for pain control by binding to mu-opioid receptors in the central nervous system (CNS), which reduces the transmission of pain signals to the brain. In addition, opioids affect receptors in the gastrointestinal tract and respiratory system. These medications are used to treat pain, diarrhea, and cough.[8]

  • Common opioids
    • Codeine: Codeine is one of the most commonly used opioid medications. This medication is at the center of the opioid addiction problem in the United States and thus is highly regulated. Codeine is primarily prescribed for pain and cough.
  • FDA-approved indication
    • Pain: Codeine is used to treat mild to moderate pain. The use of codeine is recognized in chronic pain due to ongoing cancer and palliative care. However, the use of codeine to treat other types of chronic pain remains controversial. Chronic pain, defined by the International Association for the Study of Pain, is pain persisting beyond the standard tissue healing time, which is 3 months.[1] The most common causes of non-cancer chronic pain include back pain, fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, and headache.
  • Non–FDA-approved indications
    • Cough: Codeine is useful in treating various etiologies that produce a chronic cough. Additionally, 46% of patients with chronic cough do not have a distinct etiology despite undergoing a proper diagnostic evaluation. In such cases, codeine has been shown to reduce both the frequency and severity of coughs. However, the evidence supporting its effectiveness in treating chronic cough is limited. The dose can vary from 15 to 120 mg/d. In specific populations such as lung cancer, codeine is indicated for managing prolonged cough, typically as 30 mg every 4 to 6 hours as needed.
  • Restless leg syndrome
    • Codeine is effective in treating restless leg syndrome when given at night, especially for individuals whose symptoms are not relieved by other medications.
  • Persistent diarrhea (palliative)
    • Codeine and loperamide are equally effective for managing persistent diarrhea. The choice between codeine and loperamide depends on the physician's evaluation of codeine's addictive potential versus loperamide's higher cost, along with the patient's susceptibility to adverse effects.

Fentanyl: Transdermal patches and intravenous formulations are commonly abused and used in combination with other drugs. Fentanyl is a synthetic opioid that is 80 to 100 times stronger compared to morphine and is often added to heroin to increase its potency. This drug can cause severe respiratory depression and death, particularly when mixed with other drugs or alcohol. Fentanyl has a high potential for addiction.[9]

Hydrocodone: Hydrocodone is a Schedule II semi-synthetic opioid medication used to treat pain. Immediate-release hydrocodone is available only in combination with other agents, such as acetaminophen and ibuprofen, and is approved by the FDA for managing pain severe enough to require an opioid analgesic and for which alternative (nonopioid) treatments are inadequate. Single-entity hydrocodone is only available in extended-release formulations and is approved by the FDA to treat persistent, severe pain requiring around-the-clock, long-term opioid therapy when alternative options are insufficient. Hydrocodone is also an antitussive and is indicated for the treatment of cough in adults.[10]

Morphine sulfate: Morphine sulfate is approved by the FDA for moderate-to-severe pain, whether acute or chronic. Most commonly used in pain control, morphine provides significant relief to patients afflicted with pain. Clinical situations that significantly benefit from medicating with morphine include managing palliative or end-of-life care, active cancer treatment, and vaso-occlusive pain during sickle cell crises. Morphine is widely used off-label for almost any condition that causes pain. In the emergency department, morphine is given for musculoskeletal pain, abdominal pain, chest pain, arthritis, and even headaches when patients fail to respond to first- and second-line agents. Although morphine is rarely used for procedural sedation, clinicians sometimes combine a low dose of morphine with a low dose of benzodiazepine, such as lorazepam, for minor procedures.[11]

Oxycodone: Oxycodone is an opioid agonist prescription medication. The immediate-release formulation is approved by the FDA for managing acute or chronic moderate-to-severe pain when alternative treatments are inadequate and opioid therapy is deemed appropriate. The extended-release formulation is approved by the FDA for managing pain severe enough to require continuous (24 h/d), long-term opioid treatment, and for which there are no alternative options to treat the pain. The oxycodone to morphine dose equivalent ratio is approximately 1:1.5 for immediate-release and 1:2 for extended-release formulations.[12]

Tramadol: Tramadol is an FDA-approved medication for pain relief. This medication has specific indications for moderate-to-severe pain. Tramadol is classified as a Schedule IV drug by the FDA. Due to its potential for abuse and addiction, tramadol should be reserved for pain that is unresponsive to other treatments, including nonopioid analgesics. Tramadol is available in 2 formulations: extended-release and immediate-release. The immediate-release form is not intended for use as an as-needed medication; instead, it is for pain of less than 1 week duration. For pain lasting more than 1 week, the extended-release form is preferred, as it is indicated for pain control under 24-hour management or an extended period.

Tramadol has demonstrated off-label effectiveness in the management of premature ejaculation and restless leg syndrome that is refractory to other treatments. For the off-label use of tramadol for premature ejaculation, both sporadic and daily use is effective for treating the condition. Patients generally prefer as-needed therapy for premature ejaculation due to the lack of adverse effects compared to the daily use of tramadol.[13]

Addiction, Dependence, and Tolerance

Although each of these terms is similar, healthcare providers should be aware of the differences.

  • Addiction: The constant need for a drug despite harmful consequences.
  • Pseudoaddiction: Constant fear of being in pain and hypervigilance; typically, there is a resolution with pain resolution.
  • Dependence: Physical adaptation to a medication where it is necessary for normal function, and withdrawal occurs with the lack of drugs.
  • Tolerance: The lack of expected response to a medication, increasing dose to achieve the same pain relief, resulting from CNS adaptation to the medication over time.

Mainstreaming Addiction Treatment Act

The Mainstreaming Addiction Treatment (MAT) Act updates federal guidelines to expand the availability of evidence-based treatment to address the opioid epidemic. The MAT Act empowers all healthcare providers with a standard controlled substance license to prescribe buprenorphine for opioid use disorder, just as they prescribe other essential medications. The MAT Act aims to help destigmatize a standard of care for opioid use disorder and integrate substance use disorder treatment across all healthcare settings. 

As of December 2022, the MAT Act has eliminated the DATA-Waiver (X-Waiver) program. All DEA-registered practitioners with Schedule III authority may now prescribe buprenorphine for opioid use disorder in their practice if permitted by applicable state law, and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration encourages practitioners to do so. Prescribers who were registered as DATA-Waiver prescribers receive a new DEA registration certificate reflecting this change; no action is required on their part.

There are no longer any limits on the number of patients with opioid use disorder that a practitioner may treat with buprenorphine. Separate tracking of patients treated with buprenorphine or prescriptions written is no longer required.

Pharmacy staff can now fill buprenorphine prescriptions using the prescribing authority's DEA number and do not need a DATA 2000 waiver from the prescriber. However, depending on the pharmacy, the dispensing software may still require the X-Waiver information to proceed. Practitioners are still required to comply with any applicable state limits regarding the treatment of patients with opioid use disorder. For more information or assistance, contact your State Opioid Treatment Authority.

Etiology

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Etiology

Pain associated with acute injuries may require scheduled drug treatment. For some patients, the acute pain experienced may become chronic. Pain can be the result of neurological and musculoskeletal conditions. Pain may also be local or systemic as a complication of diseases.[14] Chronic pain syndromes have associations with many long-term conditions and diseases.

Common Causes of Legitimate Pain

Neurological and systemic diseases that cause pain

  • Alcohol use disorder
  • Ankylosing spondylitis
  • Brachial plexus traction injury
  • Cancer
  • Complex regional pain syndrome
  • Diabetic polyneuropathy
  • Drugs
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Giant cell arteritis
  • Glaucoma
  • Infections
  • Migraine
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Osteomalacia
  • Pernicious anemia
  • Polymyalgia rheumatica
  • Polyneuropathies
  • Polyradiculopathies
  • Postherpetic neuralgia
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Adverse effects of chemotherapy or radiation therapy
  • Sjögren syndrome
  • Spinal stenosis
  • Systemic lupus erythematosus
  • Smoking
  • Temporomandibular joint dysfunction
  • Thoracic outlet syndrome
  • Trigeminal neuralgia
  • Thyroid disease

Psychological causes of pain

  • Anxiety
  • Depression
  • Emotional disorders
  • Personality disorders
  • Sleep disorders

Musculoskeletal causes of pain

  • Ankylosing spondylitis
  • Chronic overuse
  • Dislocations
  • Fractures
  • Muscular strains
  • Myofascial diseases
  • Polymyalgia rheumatica
  • Polymyositis
  • Osteomyelitis
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Osteoporosis
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Mechanical back injury

Common Factors Contributing to the Illegitimate Use of Controlled Substances

Any of the above conditions and causes of acute pain may progress to chronic pain. When there is chronic use of pain medicine, the risk of developing a substance use disorder to a controlled substance to control the pain increases. Risk factors for a substance use disorder with a pain medication include:

  • Age
  • Life circumstances
  • Medical problems
  • Physical problems

Factors that increase the risk of developing substance use disorder include:

  • If an individual uses drugs to stay awake or sleep, they are at increased risk of developing a substance use disorder.
  • If an individual undergoes exposure to other individuals with a substance use disorder, they are at a higher risk of developing substance use disorder.
  • If a parent has a substance use disorder, there is a greater chance that the children may develop a substance use disorder.
  • Individuals who engage in prescriber shopping are at increased risk of substance use disorder.
  • If an individual receives multiple drugs from multiple prescribers, they are at a higher risk of addiction.

Factors that decrease the risk of substance use disorder include:

  • Middle age
  • No history of psychiatric illness
  • Relaxed personality
  • Adherence to prescribed instructions

Epidemiology

Acute and chronic pain are significant problems in the United States and worldwide. In the United States alone, it affects more than 100 million Americans annually. The evaluation and treatment of pain costs over 600 billion dollars annually, including the impact on individuals unable to work due to pain syndromes.

Pain Frequency

  • Pain is one of the leading reasons individuals receive federal and private disability benefits..
  • Pain syndromes affect as much as 50% of the United States population at some point in their lifetime.
  • Among individuals older than 21, approximately 10% have experienced pain for 3 to 12 months, and almost 50% have had pain longer than 1 year. Nearly 50% report their pain is uncontrolled.
  • Over 5 million Americans are receiving long-term opioid analgesics for chronic pain, and for many, the pain is significantly disabling.

Factors Contributing to the Rising Frequency of Acute and Chronic Pain

The prevalence of both acute and chronic pain is believed to be increasing due to several contributing factors:

  • The increased average age of the population
  • Increased diversion of pain medications due to state and federal enforcement of illicit drugs
  • Increased frequency of surgery and postoperative pain management with opioid analgesics
  • Increased obesity with comorbid problems such as muscle strain and joint deterioration
  • Increased treatment of pain
  • The survival of military personnel and civilians with traumatic conditions has increased, despite increased pain during recovery.

Frequency of Opioid-Related Concerns

Frequency of opioid prescribing and consumption:

  • Even though the lay literature reports that opioid prescribing is on the rise, opioid analgesic prescribing is declining.
  • Prescriptions for hydrocodone, methadone, and fentanyl have decreased by as much as one-third since peaking in 2011.
  • Before the 1990s, clinicians rarely prescribed opioids for noncancer pain. Beginning in the 1990s, clinicians were encouraged to control pain, as it was considered the fifth vital sign. The use of opioid analgesic pain medicine increased substantially. The consensus is that overprescribing of opioid analgesics occurs, but it is still unclear in the literature where this occurs and the exact circumstances when prescriptions are inappropriate.
  • Although opioid prescribing and overdose rates have declined significantly, this reduction has, at times, made it more difficult for patients with legitimate pain to access adequate pain relief.
  • Abuse within the healthcare system has led to increasing barriers to access, making it more difficult for some patients to find healthcare professionals willing or able to prescribe pain medication.
  • Opioid analgesic prescribing has also declined in Florida.
  • Worldwide, the consumption of opioid analgesics has substantially increased over the last 20 years. 

Opioid overdose:

  • Nationally, opioid-related overdose fatalities have been decreasing since peaking in 2011.
  • In Florida, fatalities from illicit drugs have increased, whereas there has been a decrease in prescription overdose fatalities.
  • Opioid analgesic fatalities often occur with co-ingestion of benzodiazepines, such as diazepam.

Controlled Substance Use and Addiction/Substance Use Disorder

The substance use disorder of prescription drugs has become a common problem. Individuals affected may not fit the profile of an individual addicted to street drugs. These individuals are often employed and suffer from chronic pain syndromes. For multiple reasons, they may have sought self-medication to manage their pain while maintaining their lifestyles. As societal views normalize using prescription drugs, access may be easier and safer than obtaining illicit drugs. Furthermore, since many prescription medications may be covered under insurance, an increasing number of people choose to figure out ways to obtain prescription drugs over the use of illicit drugs.

Prescription drug use disorder tends to be more common among certain demographic groups, including:

  • Individuals who use opioids inappropriately
  • Individuals who regularly use opioids
  • Individuals who use alcohol or tobacco
  • Women who tend to abuse sedatives and tranquilizers

Illicit drug use is on the rise. In the United States, following the restrictions on prescription drugs, the use of heroin has increased significantly. Heroin use was previously uncommon; however, as drug enforcement agencies intensified efforts to address prescription drug abuse, many individuals with a substance use disorder turned to Schedule I drugs such as heroin. Individuals may also move from abusing Schedule II prescription drugs to abusing Schedule I illicit drugs. Individuals with a substance use disorder tend to follow the path of least resistance. When they are unable to obtain prescription drugs easily, they turn to illicit drugs or vice versa.

Often, patients are not appropriately educated on the addictive potential of controlled substances such as benzodiazepines or opioids. These patients are not aware of the danger when prescription renewals are easily accessible, especially if they see more than one prescriber.

Of patients receiving treatment in an emergency department, some are actually seeking additional medication to supplement their current consumption of opioids. Studies have found that of patients prescribed opioids in an emergency setting, 5% to 10% are already consuming opioid medications from other prescribers. Many states have reduced the prevalence of this problem by instituting statewide reporting of controlled substance prescriptions.

Pathophysiology

Pain is a common reason patients seek medical care. Pain arises from both emotional and sensory inputs, encompassing acute and chronic components.

Acute Pain

Acute pain typically occurs in response to acute tissue injury and is mediated by the activation of peripheral pain receptors and specific sensory nerve fibers, including A-delta and C nociceptors.

Acute pain is associated with the sympathetic nervous system, with physical findings that include an elevated heart rate, respiratory rate, and blood pressure. Pupillary dilation and diaphoresis may be evident.

Chronic Pain

Chronic Pain typically occurs in response to ongoing tissue injury and is believed to be caused by persistent activation of A-delta and C sensory fibers. The severity of tissue injury does not generally predict the severity of the pain. Chronic pain may result from damage or dysfunction of the peripheral or CNS, causing neuropathic pain. Chronic pain typically does not involve the sympathetic nervous system and may be associated with depression, fatigue, loss of appetite, and loss of libido.

Nociceptive Pain

Nociceptive pain can be somatic or visceral. 

  • Somatic pain receptor stimulation produces dull or sharp local pain. Burning is uncommon unless the skin or subcutaneous tissue is involved. Locations of these receptors include the skin, fascia, subcutaneous tissues, periosteum, endosteum, and joint capsules. 
  • Visceral pain receptors result in pain due to an injury to the organ capsules and connective tissue. Pain can be localized or sharp. Visceral pain resulting from obstruction of a hollow organ is poorly localized, deep, cramping, and possibly referred to remote cutaneous sites. 

Pain Modulation and Transmission

Pain fibers enter the spinal canal and the spinal cord at the dorsal root ganglia and then synapse in the dorsal horn. Fibers cross to the other side and up the lateral columns to the thalamus and then to the cerebral cortex.

Repeated stimuli from a chronic pain condition may sensitize neurons in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. As a result, a lesser peripheral stimulus may cause pain. Peripheral nerves and nerves at other levels of the CNS may become sensitized, producing long-term synaptic changes in cortical receptive fields that exaggerate pain perception.

Tissue injury triggers the release of various substances that initiate an inflammatory cascade, sensitizing peripheral nociceptors. These chemical mediators include serotonin, bradykinin, epinephrine, calcitonin gene-related protein, substance P, neurokinin A, and prostaglandin E2.

Pain signals are modulated at multiple points in both ascending and descending pathways by several neurochemical mediators, including endogenous opioids, such as methionine enkephalin and beta-endorphin, and monoamines, such as norepinephrine and serotonin. These mediators are believed to increase, sustain, shorten, or reduce the perception of and response to pain. They mediate the potential benefit of CNS-active drugs such as antidepressants, anticonvulsants, opioids, and membrane-stabilizing agents that interact with specific receptors and neurochemicals in treating chronic pain. 

Psychological Factors Causing Pain

Psychogenic factors can modulate pain intensity. Emotion has a vital role in an individual's perception of pain. Patients in chronic pain have a high degree of psychological distress, often suffering from anxiety and depression. Patients with poorly explained pain may be incorrectly diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder rather than a legitimate underlying cause of the pain, leading to inappropriately denied pain relief and exacerbating the cycle of anxiety and depression.

Acute and chronic pain may impair concentration, memory, and thought processes. Pain may be multifactorial, typically involving both nociceptive and neuropathic components (resulting from nerve damage).

Psychological factors may modulate pain, affecting how patients describe the pain and their response. The psychological reaction to long-standing chronic pain interacts with CNS factors to induce changes in pain perception. Psychological factors generate neural output that modulates neurotransmission along each pain pathway.

Histopathology

Chronic pain and opioids typically do not cause any specific histopathology changes on their own. However, improper or recreational parenteral administration of opioids can lead to a range of histopathologic alterations, including chronic tissue damage. There may be chronic tissue damage resulting from the initial injury.[15]

Toxicokinetics

The way each person processes a drug, including the rate of chemical absorption and the body's mechanisms for excreting and metabolizing the compound, varies significantly among individuals. Additionally, these processes can change based on the extent and duration of drug use.

Substance use disorder is a biological condition secondary to various environmental and genetic factors. Each individual metabolizes drugs differently, and depending on their body's response, some may find it very difficult or even impossible to stop using a drug.

History and Physical

For prescribers, distinguishing legitimate pain from drug-seeking behavior can be challenging. Pain is often difficult to assess because patients may be impaired, and self-reporting may be inaccurate or difficult to obtain. Astute clinicians should rely on a comprehensive evaluation that includes a detailed history, a thorough physical examination, and an observation-based assessment.

Signs of Pain

  • Activity changes: Appetite, increased fatigue, increased alcohol consumption, routines, and increased sleep.
  • Facial expressions: Frowning, grimacing, and rapid blinking
  • Body movements: Guarding, fidgeting, inactivity, motor restlessness, pacing, rigidity, rocking, and muscle tension
  • Interpersonal interaction changes: Aggression, diminished sex drive, disruptive behavior, irritability, resisting care, and being withdrawn
  • Mental status change: Anxiety, crying, confusion, depression, distress, irritability, and suicidal thoughts
  • Verbalizations: Statements, such as I hurt everywhere; requesting help; sighing; and verbal abuse

 Symptoms of Pain

  • Diaphoresis
  • Hypertension
  • Pupil dilation
  • Tachycardia
  • Tachypnea 

Pain Evaluation Questions

  • Character: What does the pain feel like? (for example, dull, pinching, pounding, sharp, shooting, throbbing, pounding, stinging, or burning).
  • Radiation: Does the pain move anywhere?
  • Site: Where is the pain? Where does it hurt?
  • Onset: When did the pain start?
  • Progression: Has the pain gotten worse or better since it started?
  • Duration: For how long have you had the pain? Is it episodic?
  • Severity: What is the pain severity (1 to 10)?
  • Aggravating factors: Does anything make it worse, such as movement or a position?
  • Relieving factors: Does anything you do or not do make the pain better? What treatments have you tried?
  • Associative factors: Clinicians should ask other relevant questions based on a review of systems, following the patient's complaint.

Signs and Symptoms of Drug-Seeking Behavior and Diversion

A random urine drug screen is a commonly used method to evaluate whether a patient is taking or misusing opioids. Studies show that as high as 25% of patients prescribed opioids randomly test negative. Patients discontinue opioid use due to remission of pain, adverse effects, lack of efficacy, and, in some instances, opportunities to sell their medications.

Behaviors suggesting opioid drug use disorder include:

  • Aggressive demand for more drugs
  • Forging prescriptions
  • Increased alcohol use and lack of control
  • Increasing dosage without permission
  • Injecting or inhaling drugs prescribed for oral use
  • Obtaining drugs from illegitimate sources
  • Obtaining opioids from other providers
  • Prescription loss
  • Refusing to decrease pain medication dosage when stabilized
  • Resisting medication change
  • Requesting early refills
  • Requesting specific medications
  • Selling drugs
  • Sharing prescriptions
  • Stockpiling medications
  • Using illegal drugs 

Evaluation

Assessing a patient in need of opioid analgesics requires a detailed history, a thorough physical examination, and appropriate laboratory and radiographic studies. Depending on the circumstances, consultation with psychiatrists, addiction specialists, physical therapists, and occupational therapists should be a consideration.[16]

Clinicians must have a complete understanding of the patient's primary disease and any issues regarding the evaluation of proper use, potential adverse effects, and effectiveness of opioid use for chronic pain.

Overview Of Safe Prescribing Assessment Guidelines

Healthcare professionals are trained to prescribe pain medications; however, controlled substances are commonly misused. The list below provides an overview of the requirements for the safe prescribing of controlled substances, followed by a more detailed discussion.

  • History
    • Review the chief complaint
    • Obtain current and past medical conditions
    • Obtain a list of current and past medications prescribed and dosage
    • Obtain the past medical records of patients
    • Review the pain rating scale
    • Review family history, including alcohol, drug (illicit and non-illicit), and mental health (depression assessment)
    • Review social history, including alcohol, drug (illicit and non-illicit), and tobacco; mental health (depression assessment); and relevant personal factors, such as dependents, education, employment, living situation, marital status, and legal issues
    • Review opioid abuse risk assessment
    • Review the state prescription drug program
  • Physical examination
    • Conduct a head-to-toe detailed physical examination
  • Laboratory screening
    • Obtain a urine drug test

Chronic Pain Assessment

Standard blood work and imaging are not indicated for chronic pain; however, clinicians can order them when specific causes of pain are suspected. These investigations should be considered on a case-by-case basis. In some cases, urine toxicology is ordered to monitor compliance and exclude nonprescription drugs.

Psychiatric disorders can amplify pain signaling, making symptoms of pain worse.[17] Furthermore, comorbid psychiatric disorders, such as major depressive disorder, can significantly delay the diagnosis of pain disorders.[18] The most common comorbid conditions related to chronic pain include major depressive disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. There are twice as many prescriptions for opioids prescribed each year to patients with underlying pain and a comorbid psychiatric disorder compared to patients without such comorbidity.[19] Intuitively, this makes sense. For example, patients with depression often complain of fatigue, sleep changes, loss of appetite, and decreased physical activity. These symptoms can make their pain worse over time. Importantly, patients with chronic pain are at an increased risk for suicide and suicidal ideation.[20][21]

Simultaneous screening for depression is recommended for patients with chronic pain. The two most commonly used tools are the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) and the Beck Depression Scale. The MMPI-2 has been used more frequently for patients with chronic pain.[22][23]

Addiction Risk Assessment

Clinicians should consider information from the patient's history and physical examination, input from family members, the state prescription monitoring program, and screening tools to assess the risk of developing an untoward behavioral response to opioids.[9][24][25] Based on this assessment, patients can be stratified into 3 risk categories:

  • Low risk: These patients require standard monitoring, vigilance, and care. Characteristics include:
    • Objective signs and symptoms with localizable physical pathology
    • Confirmatory testing, such as physical examination findings, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
    • No individual or family history of substance abuse
    • At most, mild medical or psychological comorbidities
    • Age younger than 45
    • High pain tolerance
    • Active coping strategies
    • Willingness to participate in multimodal therapy
    • Attempting to function at normal levels
  • Moderate risk: These patients require an additional level of monitoring and more frequent contact with their healthcare provider. Common characteristics include:
    • Significant pain
    • Defined pathology with objective signs and symptoms
    • Confirmatory testing, such as physical examination findings, CT, and MRI
    • Moderate psychological problems controlled by therapy
    • Moderate comorbidities are well-controlled by medical treatment and are not affected by opioids
    • Mild opioid tolerance but not hyperalgesia without addiction or physical dependence
    • Individual or family history of substance abuse
    • Pain involving more than 3 regions of the body
    • Moderate levels of pain acceptance
    • Active coping strategies
    • Willing to participate in multimodal therapy
    • Attempting to function at normal levels
  • High risk: These patients require intensive and structured monitoring, frequent follow-up contact, consultation with an addiction psychiatrist, and limited monthly prescription of short-acting opioids. Key characteristics include:
    • Significant, widespread pain
    • No objective signs and symptoms
    • Pain involves more than 3 body regions
    • Divergent drug-related behavior
    • Individual or family history of addiction, dependency, diversion, hyperalgesia, substance abuse, or tolerance
    • Major psychological problems
    • Age older than 45
    • HIV-related pain
    • High levels of pain exacerbation
    • Poor coping strategies
    • Unwilling to participate in multimodal therapy
    • Not functioning at a normal lifestyle

Prescribing Opioids

Before prescribing opioids, a detailed history of the patient should be obtained, including:

  • Indication requested for pain relief
  • Location, nature, and intensity of pain
  • Prior pain treatments and response
  • Comorbid conditions
  • The physical and psychological impact of pain on daily functioning
  • Family support, employment, and housing
  • Leisure activities, mood, sleep, substance use, and work
  • Emotional, physical, or sexual abuse

When considering opioids, clinicians must weigh the risks of abuse, addiction, adverse drug reactions, overdose, and physical dependence. If there are any special concerns, such as a history of substance abuse, consultation with a psychiatrist or addiction specialist is recommended. If current substance abuse, withhold prescribing until the patient is involved in an addiction treatment and monitoring program.

Assessment Tools

Screening tools help determine the risk level and degree of monitoring and structure required for a treatment plan; however, their validity is not yet supported in the literature.[25] Commonly used tools include:

Brief Intervention Tool: The Brief Intervention Tool is a 26-item yes-no questionnaire used to identify signs of opioid addiction or abuse. The items assess problems related to drug use-related functional impairment.

CAGE, CAGE-AID, and CAGE-Opioid: The CAGE (Cut down, Annoyed, Guilty, and Eye-opener) Questionnaire consists of 4 questions designed to assess alcohol abuse. CAGE-AID and CAGE-OPIOID are revised versions to evaluate the likelihood of current substance abuse.[26]

Current Opioid Misuse Measure: The Current Opioid Misuse Measure is a 17-item patient self-reported assessment designed to identify abuse in patients with chronic pain. It identifies aberrant behaviors associated with opioid misuse in patients already receiving long-term opioid therapy.

Diagnosis, Intractability, Risk, and Efficacy Tool: The Diagnosis, Intractability, Risk, and Efficacy is a clinician-rated questionnaire used to predict patient compliance with long-term opioid therapy. Patients scoring low are poor candidates for long-term opioids.

Mental Health Screening Tool: The Mental Health Screening Tool is a 5-item screen that evaluates feelings of calmness, depression, happiness, peacefulness, and nervousness in the past month. A low score indicates that the patient should be referred to a pain management specialist.

Opioid Risk Tool: The Opioid Risk Tool is a 5-item assessment to evaluate for aberrant drug-related behavior. The tool categorizes the patient into low, medium, or high levels of risk for aberrant drug-related behaviors based on question responses concerning previous alcohol, drug abuse, psychological disorders, and other risk factors.

Pain Assessment and Documentation Tool: Guidelines from the CDC, the Federation of State Medical Boards, and the Joint Commission emphasize the importance of documentation from both a quality and medicolegal perspective. The Pain Assessment and Documentation Tool was developed to help clinicians accurately document relevant information.

Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain-Revised: The Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain-Revised (SOAPP-R) is a screening tool that addresses the history of alcohol or substance use, cravings, mood, psychological status, and stress. The SOAPP-R helps assess the risk level of aberrant drug-related behaviors and determine the required level of monitoring.

VIGIL

  • Verification: Is the patient a responsible user of opioids?
  • Identification: Is the identity of this patient verifiable?
  • Generalization: Do we agree on mutual responsibilities and expectations?
  • Interpretation: Do I feel comfortable allowing this person to have controlled substances?
  • Legalization: Am I acting legally and responsibly? 

Urine Drug Tests

Urine drug tests evaluate the use of the medication prescribed and detect unsanctioned drug use. The CDC recommends drug testing before starting opioid therapy and at least annually.

A study suggests that monitoring frequency should be based on the patient's risk level (see Table. Recommended Monitoring Frequency Based on Risk Levels).[27] 

Table 1. Recommended Monitoring Frequency Based on Risk Levels

Risk Level UDT Frequency State Drug Monitoring Program
Low risk UDT every 1-2 years 2 times per year 
Medium risk UDT every 6-12 months 3 times per year
High risk UDT every 3 months 4 times per year

Abbreviation: UDT, Urine drug test.

Testing is typically performed using class-specific immunoassay drug panels; however, this may be followed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry for the detection of specific metabolites. The test should identify the specific drug. If urine test results suggest aberrant opioid use, the issue should be discussed using a positive, supportive approach, and the discussion should be documented.

Treatment / Management

Opioid analgesics should be prescribed for a limited duration, typically ranging from several days to 3 to 4 weeks. Patients need education on the risks and benefits of opioid treatment. Treatment goals should be established at the outset, including the estimated period, expected adverse effects, expected pain improvement, and the importance of not exceeding the prescribed dose without prior consultation with a healthcare provider. The treatment plan should include the selected drug, the starting dosage, measures to track pain relief, and any associated therapies, such as occupational or physical therapy.[28]

The initial patient dose should always be the lowest dose possible, and, if necessary, the dose and frequency can be gradually increased to achieve the desired effect. Dosing should be adjusted to achieve efficacy and tolerability. Patients should clearly understand the need for regular monitoring of progress and the importance of frequently assessing the benefits and risks. Patients should be aware of complications such as constipation, fatigue, nausea, and the risk of respiratory depression. Patients should make sure that only one prescriber prescribes and monitors opioid analgesic therapy. Furthermore, patients should understand that all prescribers need to be aware of opioid dosing so that other agents, such as CNS depressants, can be avoided, which may interact and cause additional respiratory depression.

When prescribing opioids, prescribers must be aware of the need for patient monitoring, equianalgesic dosing, and cross-tolerance. Prescribers need to consider the risks and benefits of short- versus long-acting/extended-release opioids.

All prescribers must be aware of federal and state opioid prescribing regulations.

Treatment Agreements and Informed Consent

Due to the inherent risks of opioids, opioid prescriptions should include a treatment agreement or written informed consent for any treatment for more than a few days. Treatment agreements should include the following:

  • Substance use disorder and misuse risks
  • Drug interactions
  • Physical dependence
  • Motor impairment
  • Short- and long-term risks/benefits
  • Adverse effects, such as constipation, rash, nausea, and respiratory depression
  • Tolerance

Prescribing practices should be stated, including:

  • Frequency of refills
  • Policy regarding early refills
  • Procedure for lost or stolen medications

The agreement should require patients to limit opioid prescriptions to a single clinician and consent to random urine drug screenings. Patients should be instructed to contact their prescriber with any concerns and to schedule in-person appointments for medication refills. The agreement should discuss monitoring, the need for follow-up visits, proper storage, and safe disposal of unused opioids. The agreement should list potential reasons for the discontinuation of opioid therapy.

Overview Of Safe Treatment With or Without Controlled Substances

Healthcare providers generally should consider using a noncontrolled substance to alleviate pain. However, if this fails, and the decision is made to prescribe a controlled substance, 2 important documents should be obtained before beginning therapy:

  • Informed consent: This document should include the prescribed drug; risks, such as overdose, respiratory depression, dependence, drug interaction, death, and, in females, the risk of neonatal withdrawal syndrome; benefits, such as pain relief; desired goal or outcome; expected length; and follow-up care. These goals should be collaborative.
  • Patient-provider agreement: This agreement is signed by the patient and provider, outlining the responsibilities of both parties, the goals of controlled substance use, and the consequences of nonadherence to the treatment plan.
    • The first prescription is a trial with a determined follow-up appointment
    • Includes tablet counts if needed
    • Refills and how they are handled
    • Use of a single healthcare provider for all controlled substances
    • Exit strategy when goals are achieved

Mild pain: Treatment is typically initiated with acetaminophen or a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, or in some cases, both. Whenever possible, alternative pain relief therapies, including physical therapy, massage, electrotherapy stimulation, yoga, biofeedback, and acupuncture, should be considered.

Moderate pain: A mild opioid such as codeine or tramadol should be started. In addition, supplemental alternative pain relief therapies should also be considered.

Severe pain: A more potent opioid such as hydrocodone, hydromorphone, oxycodone, or morphine is generally used. Immediate-release controlled substances with a half-life of 2 to 4 hours are used until the dose is stabilized. Dosage adjustments are made every 2 to 3 days. Extended-release or long-acting opioids with a half-life of 8 to 12 hours in the same family are added later. Additionally, supplemental alternative pain relief therapies are considered.

Chronic Pain

Healthcare professionals who treat patients with chronic pain should understand best practices in opioid prescribing, approaches to pain assessment, pain management modalities, and appropriate use of opioids for pain control. Pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches should be evaluated. Patients with moderate-to-severe chronic pain who have been assessed and treated with nonopioid therapy without adequate pain relief are candidates for opioid therapy. Initial treatment should be a trial of therapy, not a definitive course of treatment. The CDC has issued updated guidance on prescribing opioids for chronic pain. These guidelines address when to initiate or continue opioids for chronic pain, opioid selection, dosage, duration, follow-up, discontinuation, risk assessment, and managing opioid use harm.

Pain Referral

Referral to a pain management specialist is recommended for patients with debilitating pain that is unresponsive to initial treatment. The pain may occur in multiple locations, requiring multimodal treatment, increased dosages for adequate pain control, or invasive procedures to control pain. Treatment for both pain and a comorbid psychiatric disorder has been shown to significantly reduce both pain and symptoms of the psychiatric disorder.[29] Pain may also worsen concurrent depression; thus, the treatment of pain has been shown to enhance responses to depression treatments..[30] There are multiple pharmacological, adjunct, nonpharmacological, and interventional treatments for chronic, severe, and persistent pain. (B2)

Pharmacological Options

The list of pharmacological options for chronic pain is extensive. This list includes nonopioid analgesics such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, and aspirin. Medications such as tramadol, opioids, and antiepileptic drugs (gabapentin or pregabalin) can be useful. Furthermore, other possible pharmacological therapies include antidepressants, such as tricyclic antidepressants and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors; topical analgesics; muscle relaxers; N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists; and alpha-2 adrenergic agonists. 

Treatment response can differ between individuals, but treatment is typically performed in a stepwise manner to reduce the duration and dosage of opioid analgesics. However, there is no single approach that is appropriate for treating pain in all patients.[31]

Major Types of Pain and Their Treatment Options

Musculoskeletal pain: Chronic musculoskeletal pain is nociceptive in nature. Treatment follows a stepwise approach that includes a combination of nonopioid analgesics, opioids, and nonpharmacological therapies. First-line treatment includes acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, both of which are effective for osteoarthritis and chronic back pain.[32][33][34] However, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are relatively contraindicated in patients with a history of heart disease or myocardial infarction, renal disease, or those on anticoagulation or with a history of ulcers.[35][36] There is limited evidence supporting the superiority of one nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug over another. One nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory pharmacological agent may have a limited effect on a patient's pain, whereas another may provide adequate pain relief. The recommendations are to try different agents before moving on to opioid analgesics.[37] Failure to achieve appropriate pain relief with either acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may warrant consideration of opioid analgesics. (A1)

Opioids are considered a second-line option; however, they may be warranted for managing pain in patients with severe, persistent pain or neuropathic pain secondary to malignancy.[38] There have been conflicting results on the use of opioids in neuropathic pain. However, for both short-term and intermediate use, opioids are often used to treat neuropathic pain.[39] Opioid therapy should be initiated with extreme caution in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.[40] Opioids commonly cause significant adverse effects, including opioid-induced hyperalgesia, constipation, dependence, and sedation. For chronic musculoskeletal pain, opioids are not superior to nonopioid analgesics.[41][42](A1)

Opioid analgesics should be reserved for cases when alternative pain medications have not provided adequate pain relief or are contraindicated and when pain impacts the patient's quality of life. The potential benefits outweigh the short- and long-term effects of opioid therapy. Patients must make an informed decision after a thorough discussion of the risks, benefits, and available alternatives to opioid therapy.[41][43][44] Patients taking opioids greater than 100 morphine milligram equivalents per day are at significantly increased risk of adverse effects. Adverse effects of opioids, such as respiratory compromise, increase as the dosages increase. Patients with chronic pain could benefit from a therapy program designed to wean them from opioid analgesics to a safer dosage.[45][46] Long-acting opioids should only be used over short-acting opioids in the setting of disabling pain that severely impairs quality of life.[47](A1)

There is an estimated 78% risk of an adverse reaction to opioids, such as constipation or nausea, and a 7.5% risk of severe adverse reactions, including immunosuppression and respiratory depression.[48] Patients with chronic pain who meet the criteria for the diagnosis of opioid use disorder should receive the option of buprenorphine to treat their chronic pain. Buprenorphine is a considerably better alternative for patients with very high daily morphine equivalents who have failed to achieve adequate analgesia.(B3)

Different types of pain also warrant different treatments. For example, chronic musculoskeletal back pain is treated differently from severe diabetic neuropathy. A combination of multiple pharmacological therapies is often necessary to treat neuropathic pain. Less than 50% of patients with neuropathic pain achieve adequate pain relief with a single agent.[49] Adjunctive topical therapy, such as lidocaine or capsaicin cream, can also be utilized.[50][51](A1)

Neuropathic pain: First-line treatment for neuropathic pain often includes gabapentin or pregabalin, which are calcium channel alpha-2-delta ligands. These agents are indicated for postherpetic neuralgia, diabetic neuropathy, and mixed neuropathy.[52] There is limited evidence supporting the use of other antiepileptic medications for treating chronic pain. Many of these medications, such as lamotrigine, are associated with a more significant adverse effect profile. However, carbamazepine stands out as an exception; it is effective in treating trigeminal neuralgia and other types of chronic neuropathic pain.[53][54](A1)

Alternatively, antidepressants such as serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors or tricyclic antidepressants are an option. Antidepressants are beneficial in treating neuropathic pain, central pain syndromes, and chronic musculoskeletal pain. In neuropathic pain, antidepressants have shown a 50% reduction in pain, which is considered significant compared to the average 30% reduction observed with other pain treatments.[55][56](A1)

The serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor duloxetine is effective in treating chronic pain, osteoarthritis, and fibromyalgia.[57] Furthermore, the efficacy of duloxetine in treating comorbid depression is comparable to other antidepressants.[58][55] Venlafaxine is also effective in treating neuropathic pain.[59] Additionally, tricyclic antidepressants, such as nortriptyline, can be used. However, tricyclic antidepressants may require 6 to 8 weeks to achieve their desired effect.[38](A1)

Adjunctive topical agents such as topical lidocaine are useful in treating neuropathic pain and allodynia, particularly in postherpetic neuralgia.[60][61] Topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, such as a strain, have been shown to improve acute musculoskeletal pain but are less effective in chronic pain. However, they are more effective than controls in treating pain related to knee osteoarthritis.[62][63] Additionally, topical capsaicin cream is an option for chronic neuropathic or musculoskeletal pain unresponsive to other treatments.[64] Botulinum toxin has also demonstrated effectiveness in treating postherpetic neuralgia.[65] The use of cannabis is also an area of interest in pain research. There is some evidence supporting the effectiveness of medical marijuana in treating neuropathic pain; however, evidence for its use in other types of chronic pain remains limited.[66](A1)

Additional Nonpharmacological Options

The list of nonpharmacological therapies for chronic pain is extensive. Nonpharmacological options include heat and cold therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, relaxation therapy, biofeedback, group counseling, ultrasound stimulation, acupuncture, aerobic exercise, chiropractic, physical therapy, osteopathic manipulative medicine, occupational therapy, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) units. Interventional techniques can also be used to treat chronic pain. Some of the procedures and techniques commonly used to manage chronic pain include spinal cord stimulation, epidural steroid injections, radiofrequency nerve ablations, botulinum toxin injections, nerve blocks, trigger point injections, and intrathecal pain pumps. The efficacy of TENS units has been variable, and the results of TENS units for chronic pain management are inconclusive.[67] Deep brain stimulation may be considered for post-stroke pain, facial pain, and severe, intractable pain that has not responded to other treatments.[68] There is limited evidence supporting interventional approaches to pain control. For refractory pain, implantable intrathecal delivery systems are an option for patients who have exhausted all other options. Cognitive behavioral therapy is beneficial for pelvic pain syndromes.[69] (A1)

Spinal cord stimulators are an option for patients with chronic pain who have failed other conservative approaches. Spinal cord stimulators are most commonly implanted following failed back surgery but may also be considered for other chronic pain conditions, including complex regional pain syndrome, painful peripheral vascular disease, intractable angina, painful diabetic neuropathy, and visceral abdominal and perineal pain.[70][71][72][73][74] These stimulators have shown a 50% reduction in pain compared to continued medical therapy.[75](A1)

Addendum

Neurology care teams prescribe opioid analgesics for chronic pain conditions, such as low back pain, migraine, multiple sclerosis, peripheral neuropathy, and traumatic brain injury. The American Academy of Neurology supports electronic prescribing of controlled substances and state prescription monitoring systems to improve patient safety in opioid analgesic prescribing.[76]

Fentanyl carries the highest risk of causing respiratory depression and reduced cerebral blood flow, which can be significantly worsened when combined with heroin (diamorphine). Due to this risk, safer opioid analgesics, such as buprenorphine, morphine, or hydromorphone, should be considered as first-line options. Oxycodone has more abuse potential compared to buprenorphine and morphine.[77](B3)

In palliative care, opioid analgesics are prescribed for cancer-related pain; however, they can cause adverse drug reactions, such as respiratory depression. Opioid analgesics were found to be incorrectly prescribed, which increased patient morbidity and mortality. There is a need for improved education and training among palliative care teams to ensure appropriate dosing for effective pain control.[78]

Smallwood et al conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of opioids for symptom palliation in patients with serious respiratory disease. Opioids have been shown to improve exertional breathlessness in exercise laboratory research studies; however, they did not improve patient breathlessness, cough, or health-related quality of life when measured at home. The risks of adverse drug reactions, such as constipation, drowsiness, and nausea/vomiting, outweigh any potential benefits to the patient.[79](A1)

Differential Diagnosis

Examples of conditions that may require acute or chronic opioid analgesic use include:

  • Abdominal epilepsy
  • Abdominal migraines
  • Achilles tendon injuries
  • Adhesive capsulitis
  • Adenomyosis
  • Adhesions
  • Adnexal cysts
  • Brachial neuritis
  • Cancer
  • Carpal tunnel syndrome
  • Cervical disc disease
  • Cervical myofascial pain
  • Cervical spondylosis
  • Cervical sprain and strain
  • Complex regional pain syndrome
  • Cervical stenosis
  • Chronic pelvic pain
  • Chronic visceral pain
  • Chronic fatigue syndrome
  • Colitis
  • Dyspareunia
  • Endocervical polyps
  • Endometriosis
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Gastrointestinal problems
  • Hernias
  • Irritable bowel syndrome
  • Lateral epicondylitis
  • Lumbar degenerative disk disease
  • Lumbar facet arthropathy
  • Lumbar spondylolysis and lumbar spondylolisthesis
  • Mechanical back strain
  • Medial epicondylitis
  • Mononeuropathy and nerve entrapment
  • Morton neuroma
  • Myofascial pain syndrome
  • Neoplasia of the spinal cord
  • Neoplastic brachial plexopathy
  • Neoplastic lumbosacral plexopathy
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Osteoporosis
  • Ovarian remnant syndrome
  • Pelvic floor pain syndrome
  • Piriformis syndrome
  • Radiation-induced brachial plexopathy
  • Radiation-induced lumbosacral plexopathy
  • Rectus abdominis pain
  • Rotator cuff disease
  • Pelvic varicosities
  • Plantar fasciitis
  • Reproductive system disorders
  • Spasticity
  • Substance abuse
  • Thoracic outlet syndrome
  • Traumatic brachial plexopathy
  • Trochanteric bursitis
  • Uterine leiomyomas
  • Urinary system disorders
  • Urolithiasis
  • Vulvodynia 

Treatment Planning

Opioid analgesics should be prescribed for a limited duration, typically ranging from several days to 3 to 4 weeks. Patient education on the risks and benefits of opioid analgesic treatment should always be a feature of opioid prescribing. The goal of treatment should be defined at the outset, including establishing the estimated period for opioid therapy, expected adverse effects, expected pain improvement, and avoidance of using more medication than prescribed without prior discussion with a healthcare provider. The treatment plan should include the drug selected, starting dosage, measures to track pain relief, and associated therapies, such as occupational or physical therapy, which can help decrease pain sensation.

Opioid therapy should begin as a trial for a pre-defined period, typically less than 30 days. Treatment goals should be established before the initiation of opioid therapy, including the level of relief of pain, anxiety, depression, and the return of function while avoiding unnecessary opioid use. The plan should include therapy selection, progress measures, and additional consultations, evaluations, referrals, and therapies as needed. Healthcare providers should adhere to the following guidelines:

  • Initiate treatment with the lowest effective dose and titrate based on clinical response
  • Start with short-acting opioid formulations
  • Discuss the need for frequent risk/benefit assessments
  • Be trained to recognize the signs and symptoms of respiratory depression
  • Reassess risks and benefits with each dose increase
  • Decisions to titrate dose to 90 mg or more morphine equivalent dose should be justified
  • Stay informed about federal and state opioid prescribing regulations
  • Understand patient monitoring, equianalgesic dosing, and cross-tolerance with opioid conversion
  • Augment treatment with nonopioid or, if necessary, immediate-release opioids over long-acting opioids
  • Taper the opioid dose whenever possible

Consent and Treatment

Patients must provide informed consent to the course of therapy and understand all implications of their treatment regimen.[9]

The opioid prescription should include documented informed consent and a treatment agreement addressing:

  • Drug interactions
  • Physical dependence
  • Adverse effects
  • Tolerance
  • Physical dependence
  • Driving and motor skill impairment
  • Limited evidence of long-term benefit
  • Addiction, dependence, and misuse
  • Risk and benefit profile of the drug prescribed
  • Signs and symptoms of overdose

Prescribing policies should be clearly described, including details regarding the number and frequency of refills and procedures for lost or stolen medications.

Patient and Physician Treatment Agreement

  • The patient should agree to use medications safely, avoid prescriber shopping, and consent to urine drug testing.
  • The prescriber should agree to address problems, conduct follow-up visits, and manage scheduled refills.

Reasons for changing or discontinuing opioid therapy should be stated. Agreements can also include follow-up visits, monitoring, and safe storage and disposal of unused drugs. If the patient does not speak English, an interpreter should be used.

Discontinuing Opioid Therapy

Discontinuing opioid therapy should be based on a physician-patient discussion. Opioids should be discontinued when the pain has resolved, adverse effects develop, analgesia is inadequate, quality of life is not improved, deterioration of function, or evidence of aberrant medication use. Opioids should be tapered slowly, and an addiction specialist should manage withdrawal.

Toxicity and Adverse Effect Management

The toxicities of prescribed opioid analgesics are avoidable with appropriate daily dosing, and opioid analgesics are not combined with other CNS depressants, such as ethanol, diazepam, and phenobarbital.[80]

Constipation is not an uncommon adverse effect of opioid analgesics, but this is manageable with the careful use of laxatives. If laxative treatment is ineffective, then drugs such as methylnaltrexone can help relieve constipation while maintaining pain control with an opioid analgesic, such as morphine.

Adverse Reactions to Opioids

Common adverse reactions include drowsiness, respiratory depression, confusion, dizziness, nausea/vomiting, headache, fatigue, pruritus, pinpoint pupils, constipation, and urinary retention. Because opioids induce euphoria at higher doses than prescribed, these drugs are at high risk for abuse and addiction. Long-term drug tolerance, hyperalgesia, or increased sensitivity to pain caused by damage to nociceptors or peripheral nerves may occur.

Depressants 

Hypnotics, sedatives, and tranquilizers treat anxiety and sleep disorders. These drugs increase the inhibitory activity of the neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid by inhibiting overall brain activity, producing a calming effect.

Anxiety

Benzodiazepines are Schedule IV medications and include drugs such as alprazolam, clonazepam, diazepam, estazolam, and triazolam. These medications are used to treat anxiety, stress reactions, muscle spasms, and sleep disorders. Benzodiazepines should be used short-term with caution as they have a high risk of addiction, dependence, and tolerance. The combination of benzodiazepines and opioids should be avoided due to the potential for addiction and respiratory depression.

All CNS depressants can cause confusion, drowsiness, and poor coordination. These medications should not be discontinued abruptly, as sudden withdrawal can lead to serious or potentially life-threatening symptoms, including seizures. Benzodiazepine overdose is treated with flumazenil, a benzodiazepine antagonist administered intravenously for rapid reversal.

For the treatment of anxiety, safer alternatives such as buspirone may be considered. Buspirone acts on serotonin and dopamine D2 receptors, produces minimal sedation, and carries a lower risk of abuse.

Sleep

Prescribers should prioritize non-benzodiazepine sleep medications such as eszopiclone, zolpidem, and zaleplon whenever possible. These medications act on gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptors in the brain but typically have fewer adverse effects and a lower risk of dependence, placing them in Schedule IV. Other alternatives include melatonin and ramelteon.

Stimulants

Commonly abused stimulants include dextroamphetamine, methamphetamine, and methylphenidate. These drugs work by enhancing the effects of neurotransmitters such as norepinephrine and dopamine in the brain. Although stimulants increase alertness, cognition, energy, and motivation, they also induce vascular constriction, resulting in elevated heart rate and blood pressure, increased respiratory rate, dilated airways, elevated blood glucose, and insomnia. Stimulants are used to treat attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, narcolepsy, and, rarely, depression. Misuse can cause euphoria due to increased dopamine activity in the brain. Abrupt withdrawal can cause depression, fatigue, and insomnia. Abuse or overdose may cause hostility, paranoia, psychosis, hyperthermia, arrhythmias, cardiovascular arrest, or seizures. These drugs are classified as Schedule II substances.

Modafinil is a slightly safer alternative. This drug works by blocking the reuptake of dopamine and other neurotransmitters. Modafinil is classified as a Schedule IV drug due to its somewhat safer profile.

The American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians guidelines recommend monitoring opioid adherence, abuse, and nonadherence through urine drug tests and monitoring programs.

The treatment plan for opioid use in chronic pain should include frequent assessment of pain level, origin, and function. If there is a change in dosage or drug, the frequency of patient visits should be increased. Chronic response to opioids should be monitored by evaluating the 5 A's.

  • Affect
  • Aberrant drug-related behaviors
  • Activities of daily living
  • Adverse or side effects
  • Analgesia

Signs and symptoms, if present, that suggest treatment goals are not being achieved include:

  • Decreased appetite
  • Excessive sleeping or day/night reversal
  • Impaired function
  • Inability to concentrate
  • Mood volatility
  • Lack of involvement with others
  • Lack of re-engagement in life
  • Lack of hygiene

The decision to change, continue, or terminate opioid therapy is based on achieving treatment objectives without adverse effects. Wherever possible, clinicians should collaborate with pharmacists. 

Acute Overdose Management

Accidental or deliberate overdose is always a risk factor in patients taking opioids. Patients and their families should be educated on the signs and symptoms of an overdose and basic emergency management until the arrival of paramedics.[81]

The immediate response to overdose management is to secure the airway and breathing; however, survival is heavily dependent upon the rapid administration of an opioid antagonist. Many states permit the distribution of naloxone to the public. Licensed healthcare providers may prescribe opioid antagonists for at-risk individuals, relatives, or caregivers. Emergency medical service personnel, peace officers, and firefighters also have the drug available.

Although opioid antagonists such as naloxone, naltrexone, and nalmefene are available, acute overdoses are typically treated with naloxone, as it quickly reverses opioid-related respiratory depression. Naloxone competes with opioids at receptor sites in the brain stem, reversing desensitization to carbon dioxide and preventing respiratory failure. 

The naloxone dose is 0.4 to 2 mg administered intravenously, intramuscularly, or subcutaneously. The dose may be repeated every 2 to 3 minutes. Naloxone is available in pre-filled auto-injection devices. Advanced Cardiac Life Support protocols should be continued while naloxone is being administered. Naloxone is also available in a nasally administered dosage form.

Opioid overdoses decrease when patients have access to naloxone. Clinicians should also prescribe naloxone to high-risk patients who are prescribed opioids. A managed care pharmacy health plan noticed that not all opioid high-risk patients were prescribed naloxone. Patients who were prescribed greater than 90 morphine milligram equivalents were also deemed to have been prescribed naloxone to reduce the risk of overdose.[82]

Prognosis

Clinicians should carefully evaluate and treat patients for acute pain syndromes and use opioid analgesics at the appropriate dose and only on a short-term basis. Patients requiring long-term pain control should obtain a referral to a pain management specialist.

Current chronic pain treatments can result in an estimated 30% decrease in a patient's pain scores.[31] A 30% reduction in pain can significantly improve a patient's function and quality of life.[83] However, the long-term prognosis for patients with chronic pain shows reduced function and quality of life. Improved outcomes in patients with chronic pain are achievable, particularly with the effective treatment of comorbid psychiatric conditions. Chronic pain increases patient morbidity and mortality, and increases rates of chronic disease and obesity. Patients with chronic pain are also at a significantly increased risk of suicide compared to the general population.

Spinal cord stimulation results in inadequate pain relief in about 50% of patients. Tolerance can also occur in up to 20% to 40% of patients. The effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation decreases over time.[84] Similarly, patients who develop chronic pain and are dependent on opioids often build tolerance over time. As the amount of morphine milligram equivalents increases, the patient's morbidity and mortality also increase.

Ultimately, prevention is critical in the treatment of chronic pain. With timely and appropriate treatment of acute and subacute pain, the progression to chronic pain may be prevented, thereby minimizing its impact on the patient's quality of life.

Complications

In the United States, two of the critical complications and public health concerns of opioid analgesics are overdoses and opioid use disorder.

Chronic pain is linked to a significantly decreased quality of life, reduced productivity, lost wages, worsening chronic disease, and psychiatric disorders, such as depression, anxiety, and substance abuse disorders. Patients with chronic pain also have a significantly increased risk for suicide and suicidal ideation.

Many medications often used to treat chronic pain have potential risks, adverse effects, and possible complications.

Acetaminophen is a standard pharmacological therapy for patients with chronic pain, either as a single agent or in combination with an opioid analgesic. Hepatotoxicity occurs with doses exceeding 5 g/d [85] and is the most common cause of acute liver failure in the United States.[86] Furthermore, hepatotoxicity can occur at therapeutic doses for patients with chronic liver disease.[87]

Frequently used adjunct medications, such as gabapentin or pregabalin, can cause sedation, swelling, mood changes, confusion, and respiratory depression in older patients who require additional analgesics.[88] These agents should be used with caution in older patients with painful diabetic neuropathy. Additionally, gabapentin or pregabalin, combined with opioid analgesics, has been shown to increase the rate of patient mortality.[89]

Duloxetine can cause mood changes, headaches, nausea, and other possible adverse effects and should be avoided in patients with a history of kidney or liver disease.

Feared complications of opioid therapy include addiction and overdose, resulting in respiratory compromise. However, opioid-induced hyperalgesia is also a significant concern. Patients become more sensitive to painful stimuli while on chronic opioids.[90] The long-term risks and adverse effects of opioids include constipation; tolerance; dependence; nausea; dyspepsia; arrhythmias, particularly QTc prolongation with methadone; and opioid-induced endocrine dysfunction, which can result in amenorrhea, impotence, gynecomastia, and decreased energy and libido. Additionally, there is a dose-dependent risk of opioid overdose with increasing daily milligram morphine equivalents.

Complication rates for spinal cord stimulators are high, ranging from 5% to 40%.[91][92] Lead migration is the most common complication, resulting in inadequate pain relief and necessitating revision and anchoring.[93][94] Lead movement often occurs in the cervical region of the spinal cord, given an increased range of motion of the cervical vertebrae.[95][96] Spinal cord stimulator lead fracture can occur in up to 9% of placements.[97][98] Seromas are also very common and may require surgical incision and drainage.[99][91] The risk of infection following a spinal cord stimulator placement is between 2.5% and 12%.[100][101] Finally, direct trauma to the spinal cord can occur. Among potential complications, a spinal cord abscess is the most significant infectious complication. A dural puncture can cause a post-dural headache in up to 70% of patients.[102][103][99] A spinal epidural hematoma is the most significant adverse event associated with spinal cord stimulator placement. This condition requires immediate neurosurgical decompression of the hematoma. The incidence of a spinal epidural hematoma is 0.71%.[104]

Drug Diversion and Drug Seeking

Some individuals seek prescribed opioids for illicit purposes due to addiction or financial gain. Prescription opioids may be obtained from a friend or relative, purchased from a black market drug dealer, obtained by prescriber shopping and acquiring drugs from multiple prescribers, or stolen from clinics, hospitals, or pharmacies.[24]

Common drug-seeking behaviors may include:

  • Aggressive demands for more opioids
  • Asking for opioids by name
  • Demonstrating behaviors indicative of opioid use disorder
  • Forged prescriptions
  • Increased alcohol use
  • Increasing medication dose without the healthcare provider's permission
  • Injecting oral medications
  • Obtaining medications from nonmedical sources
  • Obtaining opioids from multiple providers
  • Prescription loss or theft
  • Reluctance to decrease opioid dosing
  • Resisting medication change
  • Requesting early refills
  • Selling prescriptions
  • Sharing or borrowing similar medications
  • Stockpiling medications
  • Unsanctioned dose escalation
  • Using illegal drugs
  • Using pain medications to treat other symptoms

Drug Diversion Interventions

Prescribers and dispensers can take several precautions to avoid drug diversion. Some approaches include:

  • Communication among healthcare providers and pharmacies to prevent prescriber shopping
  • Educate patients on the dangers of sharing opioids 
  • Encourage patients to keep opioid medications in a private place
  • Encourage patients to refrain from public disclosure of opioid use
  • Report patient prescribing to a state-level central database if available

If a patient is suspected of drug-seeking or diversion, the following actions should be considered:

  • Inquire about prescription and illicit drug use
  • Obtain a urine drug screen
  • Perform a thorough examination
  • Perform pill counting
  • Prescribe smaller quantities of the opioid

If a patient is abusing prescribed opioids, it violates the treatment agreement. In such cases, healthcare providers may decide to discharge patients from their practice. However, if the relationship is terminated, the healthcare provider must do so legally. Healthcare providers should avoid abandoning patients, which means ending a relationship without considering the continuity of care and without providing proper notice to patients. To avoid abandonment charges, patients must be given proper advance notice to allow them to secure another clinician and facilitate the transfer of care.

Patients with a substance misuse problem or addiction should be referred to a pain specialist. Theft or loss of controlled substances should be reported to the DEA. The activity should be documented and reported to law enforcement if drug diversion has occurred.

Consultations

Most clinicians should possess the knowledge and skills to evaluate and treat patients for acute pain syndromes, including the use of opioid analgesics on a short-term basis. Patients who require long-term pain control may receive a referral to a pain specialist.

All clinicians who regularly prescribe opioids should be knowledgeable about treating opioid use disorder and aware of local referral options. Referrals to specialists should be considered when concerns arise regarding substance use disorder, pain, psychiatry, or mental health assistance.

If a patient is diagnosed with a substance use disorder, clinicians should refer the patient to both an addiction/substance use disorder specialist and a pain management professional. Unfortunately, clinicians specializing in pain and substance use disorders are rare, and it is difficult for most clinicians to find appropriate referrals.

Accurate documentation is especially critical when prescribing opioid analgesics. Clinicians should maintain accurate, complete, and up-to-date records, including copies of all prescription orders for all controlled substances, opioid contracts, instructions given for use, and the name, telephone, and address of the dispensing pharmacy. Accurate medical records show that prescribing and managing an opioid analgesic was medically necessary. Comprehensive medical records protect the prescriber and the patient.

Deterrence and Patient Education

Many countries have implemented strategies to reduce the quantity of opioid analgesics prescribed, aiming to decrease the incidence of opioid use disorder and reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with opioid analgesic abuse.

Involvement of Patients and Their Families

Patients and their families can assist in making informed decisions regarding continuing or discontinuing opioid therapy. Family members are often aware of the patient's emotional and functional status. Key questions to ask family members include:

  • Is the patient's day focused on taking opioid pain medication? 
  • What is the frequency of pain medication?
  • Does the patient have any other alcohol or drug problems?
  • Does the patient avoid activity?
  • Is the patient depressed?
  • Is the patient able to function? 

Critical information patients should know when taking opioids includes:

  • Avoid driving or operating power equipment
  • Avoid stopping opioids suddenly
  • Avoid taking other drugs that depress the respiratory system, such as alcohol, sedatives, and anxiolytics
  • Contact the prescriber if the pain medication is not adequate for relief
  • Destroy opioids based on product-specific disposal instructions, such as drug take-back options, flushing down the toilet, or mixing with cat litter or coffee grounds
  • Do not chew tables
  • Do not share opioids with friends or family
  • Follow the prescribed dosing regimen
  • Provide product-specific information
  • Take opioids only as prescribed

Pearls and Other Issues

Maintaining Accurate Medical Records for Opioid Analgesic Prescriptions

All clinicians should maintain accurate, complete, and up-to-date medical records, including:

  • All communication should be noted
  • Notes should be clear, documenting dose adjustments, effectiveness, and any adverse effects
  • Describe adherence or lack of adherence to treatment
  • Urine drug screen results
  • Concerning behaviors
  • Family interactions
  • In particular, document any decisions regarding the termination of care 

Federal and State Laws

Several regulations and programs at the federal and state levels reduce prescription opioid abuse, diversion, and overdose. These laws require the following:

  • Immunity from prosecution for individuals seeking assistance during an overdose
  • Pain clinic oversight
  • Patient identification before dispensing
  • A physical examination before prescribing opioids
  • Prescription limits
  • A prohibition on obtaining controlled substance prescriptions
  • Tamper-resistant prescriptions [105]

Federal Laws

The United States DEA sets national standards for controlled substances. Drug scheduling was mandated under the Federal Comprehensive Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Act of 1970. The law addresses controlled substances within Title II. The DEA keeps a list of controlled medications and illicit substances categorized into 5 schedules, from Schedule I to V. These categories are based on the medication's appropriate medical use and its potential for dependency and abuse.

The purpose of the law is to provide government oversight over the manufacturing and distribution of these substances. Prescribers and dispensers must have a DEA license to supply these drugs. The licensing provides links to users, prescribers, and distributors.[106][107][108]

The schedules range from Schedule I to V. Schedule I drugs are considered to have the highest risk of abuse, whereas Schedule V drugs have the lowest potential for abuse. Other factors considered by the DEA include pharmacological effects, evidence-based knowledge of the drug, risk to public health, trends in the use of the drug, and whether or not the drug has the potential to be made more dangerous through minor chemical modifications (see Table. Overview of Drug Scheduling System). 

Table 2. Overview of Drug Scheduling System

Schedule  Description
I
  • High potential for abuse with no accepted medical use; medications in this schedule may not be prescribed, dispensed, or administered.[106] 
  • Examples include marijuana (cannabis), heroin, mescaline (peyote), lysergic acid diethylamide, methylenedioxymethamphetamine, and methaqualone.
II
  • High potential for abuse with severe psychological or physical dependence; however, these medications have an accepted medical use and may be prescribed, dispensed, or administered.[106] 
  • Examples include fentanyl, oxycodone, morphine, methylphenidate, hydromorphone, amphetamine, methamphetamine (meth), pentobarbital, and secobarbital.
  • Refills are not permitted for Schedule II drugs.
III
  • Intermediate potential for abuse—lower than Schedule II but higher than Schedule IV medications.[106]
  • Examples include anabolic steroids, testosterone, and ketamine.
IV
  • The potential for abuse is lower than Schedule II but higher than Schedule V medications.[106] 
  • Examples include diazepam, alprazolam, and tramadol.
V
  • Least potential for abuse among the controlled substances.[106] 
  • Examples include pregabalin and diphenoxylate/atropine.

Understanding the DEA controlled-substance scheduling is crucial to ensure adequate caution when prescribing medications with high abuse potential and to ensure against prescribing outside of one's authority.[109][110]

The Controlled Substances Act plays a critical role in enhancing patient safety by providing federal oversight for drugs with a high potential for abuse.

A team of healthcare professionals authorized to prescribe scheduled substances, including clinicians, dentists, podiatrists, and advanced practitioners, may have links to the distribution of these substances. These healthcare professionals must require a DEA license and record prescriptions of scheduled drugs.[111][112] This licensing prevents overprescribing and requires healthcare professionals to be cautious of potential drug-seeking patients.

The dispenser must also be aware of a patient's medication history and consider the risk of polypharmacy if a patient seeks multiple providers.[113] In the context of the ongoing opioid epidemic, federal oversight and interdisciplinary collaboration are essential in reducing harm associated with scheduled drugs. However, further time and evaluation are needed to determine whether drug scheduling effectively reduces abuse, addiction, and overdose.[114][115]

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

A common concern of patients is how effectively the healthcare provider treats their pain. A team of healthcare professionals, including clinicians, nurses, and pharmacists, must collaborate to assess and treat the patient's pain appropriately and avoid addiction. Prescribers should always initiate therapy at the lowest possible dose, and then gradually increase the dose and frequency to achieve the desired effect, efficacy, and tolerability. Prescribers should ensure that patients fully understand the importance of regular monitoring and frequent assessment of the treatment's benefits and risks. Patients should be aware of complications such as constipation, fatigue, nausea, and the risk of respiratory depression.

Patients should ensure that only a single healthcare provider prescribes and monitors the opioid analgesic therapy. Furthermore, patients should understand that all healthcare providers are aware of any current opioid analgesics to avoid polypharmacy and medication interaction with other prescriptions. This communication can help reduce the chance of medication-induced CNS depression or respiratory depression. The healthcare team must be aware of federal and state regulations governing the prescribing and dispensing of opioid analgesics. Due to the inherent risks of opioid analgesic abuse, any treatment or opioid analgesic prescription of greater than a few days duration should include a treatment agreement or written informed consent.

The agreement should also require patients to have only a single clinician or appropriately licensed healthcare provider prescribe their opioid analgesic prescriptions and consent to random urine drug screens. Patients should be counseled to contact the healthcare team for any problems and to schedule in-person appointments for refills. The agreement should discuss monitoring, the need for follow-up visits, storage, and disposal of opioid analgesics not used. Additionally, it should list possible reasons for the discontinuance of opioid analgesic therapy.[111][112]

Chronic pain affects millions and represents a major public health concern due to its significant morbidity, mortality, and association with opioid diversion and misuse. Thus, chronic pain is best managed through an interprofessional approach, involving primary care clinicians, nurses, pharmacists, and pain medicine specialists. Without proper management, the patient's quality of life can be significantly impacted. The evaluation and treatment of such patients are paramount, but healthcare professionals must collaborate as a team to avoid drug diversion and misuse.

Chronic pain is associated with serious complications, including severe depression, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts. The lifetime prevalence of suicide attempts in patients with chronic pain was shown to be between 5% and 14%, whereas suicidal ideation was approximately 20%.[20] These complications often require psychiatric intervention and advanced pharmacological or interventional therapies. Severe symptoms must receive treatment immediately, leading to an increase in healthcare costs. Identifying risk factors, conducting a thorough patient assessment, and monitoring symptom progression are essential in managing chronic pain. An interprofessional team approach is the most effective strategy to mitigate the impact of chronic pain and its associated complications.

  • The first step in preventing the progression of chronic pain is the timely evaluation of acute pain by a primary care provider.
  • Conservative management of chronic pain should commence when symptoms are mild or moderate, including physical therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and pharmacological management.
  • A pharmacist or other expert should review the medication regimen to include medication reconciliation, preclude any drug-drug interactions, and alert the healthcare team regarding any concerns.
  • The patient should have regular follow-ups with both a primary care provider and a pain specialist to effectively assess and manage their pain.
  • Clinicians must address comorbid psychiatric disorders. This action may require the involvement of a psychiatrist, depending on the severity of the patient's symptoms.
  • If symptoms worsen on follow-up or if there is a concerning escalation of pharmacological therapy, such as with opioids, a referral to a pain medicine specialist merits consideration.
  • If the patient has exhausted various pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatment options, interventional procedures can be considered.
  • If the patient expresses concern for suicidal ideation or plan at any time, an emergent psychiatric team should evaluate the patient immediately.
  • Patients who have developed opioid dependence secondary to pharmacological therapy should be offered treatment, possibly referral for addiction treatment or detoxification if indicated. The patient should be on a medication weaning schedule or possibly medications to treat opioid dependence.
  • Based on CDC recommendations, patients on high-dose opioid medications or those with risk factors for opioid overdose, such as obesity, sleep apnea, and concurrent use of benzodiazepines, should receive naloxone at home for the emergent treatment of an unintentional overdose.

The interprofessional team should maintain open, clear communication regarding each patient's treatment to ensure the delivery of optimal care. In this context, nurses and pharmacists play a crucial role in verifying patient adherence to the treatment plan and monitoring progress (or lack thereof) with the present treatment plan. Nurses and pharmacists can help monitor for adverse medication side effects and concerns regarding diversion or misuse of opioids and communicate any areas of concern to the treating clinicians. Effective, open interprofessional communication and accurate documentation of findings for access by all team members are crucial in managing chronic pain and minimizing the adverse effects of chronic pain on the patient.

Interprofessional Team Case Study

Chief complaint: Syncope and Confusion

History of present illness: A 70-year-old confused female is brought to the trauma unit after she was found passed out on the bathroom floor near the toilet. Her husband reports a history of morbid obesity, diabetes mellitus, kidney disease, and chronic right hip pain. She has been scheduled for prosthetic hip surgery replacement, which has been delayed to control her weight. She has been prescribed a combination of hydrocodone and acetaminophen to effectively manage pain for ambulation and daily pool exercises. Lately, the pain has been getting worse, and her husband mentions that occasionally she takes more medicine than prescribed.

Physical examination: Her vital signs are as follows: temperature 98.7 °F, blood pressure 100/70 mm Hg, heart rate 110 bpm, respiratory rate 14 breaths/min, and O2 saturation 92%.

A physical examination reveals a somnolent female who arouses to a painful stimulus. The heart, lung, and extremity exam is normal. There are no focal neurologic deficits.

Workup: Laboratory studies, including a complete blood count, chemistry panel, and urinalysis, are normal except for a moderate elevation of the blood urea nitrogen and creatinine. A chest x-ray and pelvic film are negative for fracture. The electrocardiogram was normal. The drug screen is positive for opioids and cannabinoids.

The patient is given naloxone, after which she becomes alert and conversant. She admits that she was sitting on the toilet urinating; the last thing she remembers is feeling faint. She indicates that she has difficulty sleeping and walking due to chronic hip pain, and she experiences severe pain with exercise in their home pool. She denies suicidal ideation. She admits to taking an extra pain pill and smoking a joint before the episode.

Review of the E-FORCE (Electronic-Florida Online Reporting of Controlled Substance Evaluation Program) indicates that she has been taking oxycodone and acetaminophen 3 times a day for the last 6 weeks, as prescribed by her orthopedic surgeon.

Treatment: The patient is admitted to the hospital, and consultations are made with an orthopedic surgeon, a pain management specialist, a pharmacist, a physiotherapist, and a dietitian. Subsequent evaluation by the interprofessional team concluded that the incident was due to an accidental overdose of her opioid medication combined with her underlying comorbidities.

The patient's family and husband were informed that due to her age, diabetes mellitus, and kidney disease, the opioid analgesic she was taking was cleared less efficiently. With the doubling of her dose, she developed an acute toxic encephalopathy. The patient and her family have a limited understanding of the potential adverse effects of opioids in treating pain and a poor understanding of exercise and dieting for weight control.The interprofessional team recommends that the family continue opioids at the prescribed dose without any additional doses, use nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for breakthrough pain, monitor physical therapy and exercise, follow a planned diet, consider temporary placement of a TENS unit, have pain monitor by a pain specialist, and undergo surgical intervention as soon as possible.

At discharge, a written treatment and management plan is presented to the patient and their family for discussion and informed consent. The goals of the plan are to relieve pain, increase physical activity, promote weight loss, and ensure that surgical intervention occurs as soon as possible.

The patient is scheduled for outpatient pain management, physical therapy, and weight management. Before discharge, the pharmacist counsels the patient and family regarding the safe use, dosage regulation, adverse effects, and proper disposal of opioid medication. An emergency naloxone kit is prescribed, and the family is educated on its use.

Follow-up: Three months after discharge, the patient successfully lost 40 pounds (18 kg) and was cleared for hip replacement surgery. Following the procedure, the patient's pain has dramatically diminished, and she has gradually tapered off her pain medications. She continues to maintain a regular exercise and diet regimen until she notices noticeable improvement. She reports that she feels better, enjoys life, and is encouraged by her progress.

References


[1]

Kaldy J. Controlled Substances Add New Layer to E-Prescribing. The Consultant pharmacist : the journal of the American Society of Consultant Pharmacists. 2016 Apr:31(4):200-6. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2016.200. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 27056356]


[2]

Manchikanti L, Kaye AM, Knezevic NN, McAnally H, Slavin K, Trescot AM, Blank S, Pampati V, Abdi S, Grider JS, Kaye AD, Manchikanti KN, Cordner H, Gharibo CG, Harned ME, Albers SL, Atluri S, Aydin SM, Bakshi S, Barkin RL, Benyamin RM, Boswell MV, Buenaventura RM, Calodney AK, Cedeno DL, Datta S, Deer TR, Fellows B, Galan V, Grami V, Hansen H, Helm Ii S, Justiz R, Koyyalagunta D, Malla Y, Navani A, Nouri KH, Pasupuleti R, Sehgal N, Silverman SM, Simopoulos TT, Singh V, Solanki DR, Staats PS, Vallejo R, Wargo BW, Watanabe A, Hirsch JA. Responsible, Safe, and Effective Prescription of Opioids for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain: American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) Guidelines. Pain physician. 2017 Feb:20(2S):S3-S92     [PubMed PMID: 28226332]


[3]

Jayawant SS, Balkrishnan R. The controversy surrounding OxyContin abuse: issues and solutions. Therapeutics and clinical risk management. 2005 Jun:1(2):77-82     [PubMed PMID: 18360547]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[4]

D'Aunno T, Park SE, Pollack HA. Evidence-based treatment for opioid use disorders: A national study of methadone dose levels, 2011-2017. Journal of substance abuse treatment. 2019 Jan:96():18-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Oct 16     [PubMed PMID: 30466543]


[5]

Thomas CP, Ritter GA, Harris AHS, Garnick DW, Freedman KI, Herbert B. Applying American Society of Addiction Medicine Performance Measures in Commercial Health Insurance and Services Data. Journal of addiction medicine. 2018 Jul/Aug:12(4):287-294. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000408. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29601307]


[6]

Rigg KK, March SJ, Inciardi JA. Prescription Drug Abuse & Diversion: Role of the Pain Clinic. Journal of drug issues. 2010:40(3):681-702     [PubMed PMID: 21278927]


[7]

O'Donnell J, Gladden RM, Mattson CL, Hunter CT, Davis NL. Vital Signs: Characteristics of Drug Overdose Deaths Involving Opioids and Stimulants - 24 States and the District of Columbia, January-June 2019. MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report. 2020 Sep 4:69(35):1189-1197. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6935a1. Epub 2020 Sep 4     [PubMed PMID: 32881854]


[8]

Peechakara BV, Tharp JG, Eriator II, Gupta M. Codeine. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 30252285]


[9]

Kopitnik NL, Huecker MR. Opioid Prescribing. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 31869184]


[10]

Cofano S, Patel P, Yellon R. Hydrocodone. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 30725973]


[11]

Murphy PB, Patel P, Barrett MJ. Morphine. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 30252371]


[12]

Sadiq NM, Dice TJ, Mead T. Oxycodone. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 29489158]


[13]

Dhesi M, Maldonado KA, Patel P, Maani CV. Tramadol. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 30725745]


[14]

Fitridge R, Thompson M, Schug SA, Daly HCS, Stannard KJD. Pathophysiology of Pain. Mechanisms of Vascular Disease: A Reference Book for Vascular Specialists. 2011:():     [PubMed PMID: 30485023]


[15]

Dydyk AM, Conermann T. Chronic Pain. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 31971706]


[16]

Tenney L, McKenzie LM, Matus B, Mueller K, Newman LS. Effect of an opioid management program for Colorado workers' compensation providers on adherence to treatment guidelines for chronic pain. American journal of industrial medicine. 2019 Jan:62(1):21-29. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22920. Epub 2018 Nov 30     [PubMed PMID: 30499587]


[17]

Price DD. Psychological and neural mechanisms of the affective dimension of pain. Science (New York, N.Y.). 2000 Jun 9:288(5472):1769-72     [PubMed PMID: 10846154]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[18]

Clark L, Jones K, Pennington K. Pain assessment practices with nursing home residents. Western journal of nursing research. 2004 Nov:26(7):733-50     [PubMed PMID: 15466611]


[19]

Closs SJ, Briggs M. Patients' verbal descriptions of pain and discomfort following orthopaedic surgery. International journal of nursing studies. 2002 Jul:39(5):563-72     [PubMed PMID: 11996877]


[20]

Tang NK, Crane C. Suicidality in chronic pain: a review of the prevalence, risk factors and psychological links. Psychological medicine. 2006 May:36(5):575-86     [PubMed PMID: 16420727]


[21]

Petrosky E, Harpaz R, Fowler KA, Bohm MK, Helmick CG, Yuan K, Betz CJ. Chronic Pain Among Suicide Decedents, 2003 to 2014: Findings From the National Violent Death Reporting System. Annals of internal medicine. 2018 Oct 2:169(7):448-455. doi: 10.7326/M18-0830. Epub 2018 Sep 11     [PubMed PMID: 30208405]


[22]

Long CJ. The relationship between surgical outcome and MMPI profiles in chronic pain patients. Journal of clinical psychology. 1981 Oct:37(4):744-9     [PubMed PMID: 6458625]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[23]

BECK AT, WARD CH, MENDELSON M, MOCK J, ERBAUGH J. An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of general psychiatry. 1961 Jun:4():561-71     [PubMed PMID: 13688369]


[24]

Azadfard M, Huecker MR, Leaming JM. Opioid Addiction (Archived). StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 28846246]


[25]

Brott NR, Peterson E, Cascella M. Opioid, Risk Tool. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 31985940]


[26]

Lee CS, Kim D, Park SY, Lee SC, Kim YC, Moon JY. Usefulness of the Korean Version of the CAGE-Adapted to Include Drugs Combined With Clinical Predictors to Screen for Opioid-Related Aberrant Behavior. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2019 Sep:129(3):864-873. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003580. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 31425231]


[27]

Atluri S, Akbik H, Sudarshan G. Prevention of opioid abuse in chronic non-cancer pain: an algorithmic, evidence based approach. Pain physician. 2012 Jul:15(3 Suppl):ES177-89     [PubMed PMID: 22786456]


[28]

Copenhaver DJ, Karvelas NB, Fishman SM. Risk Management for Opioid Prescribing in the Treatment of Patients With Pain From Cancer or Terminal Illness: Inadvertent Oversight or Taboo? Anesthesia and analgesia. 2017 Nov:125(5):1610-1615. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002463. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29049111]


[29]

Arnow BA, Hunkeler EM, Blasey CM, Lee J, Constantino MJ, Fireman B, Kraemer HC, Dea R, Robinson R, Hayward C. Comorbid depression, chronic pain, and disability in primary care. Psychosomatic medicine. 2006 Mar-Apr:68(2):262-8     [PubMed PMID: 16554392]


[30]

Fishbain DA, Cole B, Lewis JE, Gao J. Does pain interfere with antidepressant depression treatment response and remission in patients with depression and pain? An evidence-based structured review. Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.). 2014 Sep:15(9):1522-39. doi: 10.1111/pme.12448. Epub 2014 Aug 19     [PubMed PMID: 25139618]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[31]

Turk DC, Wilson HD, Cahana A. Treatment of chronic non-cancer pain. Lancet (London, England). 2011 Jun 25:377(9784):2226-35. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60402-9. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 21704872]


[32]

Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, Casey D, Cross JT Jr, Shekelle P, Owens DK, Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians, American College of Physicians, American Pain Society Low Back Pain Guidelines Panel. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Annals of internal medicine. 2007 Oct 2:147(7):478-91     [PubMed PMID: 17909209]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[33]

Zhang W, Doherty M, Leeb BF, Alekseeva L, Arden NK, Bijlsma JW, Dinçer F, Dziedzic K, Häuselmann HJ, Herrero-Beaumont G, Kaklamanis P, Lohmander S, Maheu E, Martín-Mola E, Pavelka K, Punzi L, Reiter S, Sautner J, Smolen J, Verbruggen G, Zimmermann-Górska I. EULAR evidence based recommendations for the management of hand osteoarthritis: report of a Task Force of the EULAR Standing Committee for International Clinical Studies Including Therapeutics (ESCISIT). Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2007 Mar:66(3):377-88     [PubMed PMID: 17046965]


[34]

Zhang W, Moskowitz RW, Nuki G, Abramson S, Altman RD, Arden N, Bierma-Zeinstra S, Brandt KD, Croft P, Doherty M, Dougados M, Hochberg M, Hunter DJ, Kwoh K, Lohmander LS, Tugwell P. OARSI recommendations for the management of hip and knee osteoarthritis, Part II: OARSI evidence-based, expert consensus guidelines. Osteoarthritis and cartilage. 2008 Feb:16(2):137-62. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.12.013. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 18279766]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[35]

Bjordal JM, Ljunggren AE, Klovning A, Slørdal L. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, including cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors, in osteoarthritic knee pain: meta-analysis of randomised placebo controlled trials. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2004 Dec 4:329(7478):1317     [PubMed PMID: 15561731]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[36]

Fendrick AM, Greenberg BP. A review of the benefits and risks of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the management of mild-to-moderate osteoarthritis. Osteopathic medicine and primary care. 2009 Jan 6:3():1. doi: 10.1186/1750-4732-3-1. Epub 2009 Jan 6     [PubMed PMID: 19126235]


[37]

Rasmussen-Barr E, Held U, Grooten WJA, Roelofs PDDM, Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Wertli MM. Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs for Sciatica: An Updated Cochrane Review. Spine. 2017 Apr 15:42(8):586-594. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002092. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28399072]


[38]

Dworkin RH, O'Connor AB, Backonja M, Farrar JT, Finnerup NB, Jensen TS, Kalso EA, Loeser JD, Miaskowski C, Nurmikko TJ, Portenoy RK, Rice ASC, Stacey BR, Treede RD, Turk DC, Wallace MS. Pharmacologic management of neuropathic pain: evidence-based recommendations. Pain. 2007 Dec 5:132(3):237-251. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2007.08.033. Epub 2007 Oct 24     [PubMed PMID: 17920770]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[39]

McNicol ED, Midbari A, Eisenberg E. Opioids for neuropathic pain. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2013 Aug 29:2013(8):CD006146. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006146.pub2. Epub 2013 Aug 29     [PubMed PMID: 23986501]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[40]

Von Korff M, Kolodny A, Deyo RA, Chou R. Long-term opioid therapy reconsidered. Annals of internal medicine. 2011 Sep 6:155(5):325-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-5-201109060-00011. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 21893626]


[41]

Santos J, Alarcão J, Fareleira F, Vaz-Carneiro A, Costa J. Tapentadol for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2015 May 27:2015(5):CD009923. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009923.pub2. Epub 2015 May 27     [PubMed PMID: 26017279]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[42]

Krebs EE, Gravely A, Nugent S, Jensen AC, DeRonne B, Goldsmith ES, Kroenke K, Bair MJ, Noorbaloochi S. Effect of Opioid vs Nonopioid Medications on Pain-Related Function in Patients With Chronic Back Pain or Hip or Knee Osteoarthritis Pain: The SPACE Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Mar 6:319(9):872-882. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0899. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29509867]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[43]

Chou R, Fanciullo GJ, Fine PG, Adler JA, Ballantyne JC, Davies P, Donovan MI, Fishbain DA, Foley KM, Fudin J, Gilson AM, Kelter A, Mauskop A, O'Connor PG, Passik SD, Pasternak GW, Portenoy RK, Rich BA, Roberts RG, Todd KH, Miaskowski C, American Pain Society-American Academy of Pain Medicine Opioids Guidelines Panel. Clinical guidelines for the use of chronic opioid therapy in chronic noncancer pain. The journal of pain. 2009 Feb:10(2):113-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.10.008. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 19187889]


[44]

Frieden TR, Houry D. Reducing the Risks of Relief--The CDC Opioid-Prescribing Guideline. The New England journal of medicine. 2016 Apr 21:374(16):1501-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1515917. Epub 2016 Mar 15     [PubMed PMID: 26977701]


[45]

Dublin S, Walker RL, Shortreed SM, Ludman EJ, Sherman KJ, Hansen RN, Thakral M, Saunders K, Parchman ML, Von Korff M. Impact of initiatives to reduce prescription opioid risks on medically attended injuries in people using chronic opioid therapy. Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety. 2019 Jan:28(1):90-96. doi: 10.1002/pds.4678. Epub 2018 Oct 30     [PubMed PMID: 30375121]


[46]

Von Korff M, Dublin S, Walker RL, Parchman M, Shortreed SM, Hansen RN, Saunders K. The Impact of Opioid Risk Reduction Initiatives on High-Dose Opioid Prescribing for Patients on Chronic Opioid Therapy. The journal of pain. 2016 Jan:17(1):101-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.10.002. Epub 2015 Oct 22     [PubMed PMID: 26476264]


[47]

Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain - United States, 2016. MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports. 2016 Mar 18:65(1):1-49. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr6501e1. Epub 2016 Mar 18     [PubMed PMID: 26987082]


[48]

Els C, Jackson TD, Kunyk D, Lappi VG, Sonnenberg B, Hagtvedt R, Sharma S, Kolahdooz F, Straube S. Adverse events associated with medium- and long-term use of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain: an overview of Cochrane Reviews. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2017 Oct 30:10(10):CD012509. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012509.pub2. Epub 2017 Oct 30     [PubMed PMID: 29084357]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[49]

Freynhagen R, Bennett MI. Diagnosis and management of neuropathic pain. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2009 Aug 12:339():b3002. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3002. Epub 2009 Aug 12     [PubMed PMID: 19675082]


[50]

Gilron I, Baron R, Jensen T. Neuropathic pain: principles of diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clinic proceedings. 2015 Apr:90(4):532-45. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.01.018. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 25841257]


[51]

Finnerup NB, Attal N, Haroutounian S, McNicol E, Baron R, Dworkin RH, Gilron I, Haanpää M, Hansson P, Jensen TS, Kamerman PR, Lund K, Moore A, Raja SN, Rice AS, Rowbotham M, Sena E, Siddall P, Smith BH, Wallace M. Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet. Neurology. 2015 Feb:14(2):162-73. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70251-0. Epub 2015 Jan 7     [PubMed PMID: 25575710]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[52]

Derry S, Bell RF, Straube S, Wiffen PJ, Aldington D, Moore RA. Pregabalin for neuropathic pain in adults. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2019 Jan 23:1(1):CD007076. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007076.pub3. Epub 2019 Jan 23     [PubMed PMID: 30673120]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[53]

Gronseth G, Cruccu G, Alksne J, Argoff C, Brainin M, Burchiel K, Nurmikko T, Zakrzewska JM. Practice parameter: the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (an evidence-based review): report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the European Federation of Neurological Societies. Neurology. 2008 Oct 7:71(15):1183-90. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000326598.83183.04. Epub 2008 Aug 20     [PubMed PMID: 18716236]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[54]

Wiffen PJ, Derry S, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Carbamazepine for acute and chronic pain in adults. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2011 Jan 19:(1):CD005451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005451.pub2. Epub 2011 Jan 19     [PubMed PMID: 21249671]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[55]

McQuay HJ, Tramèr M, Nye BA, Carroll D, Wiffen PJ, Moore RA. A systematic review of antidepressants in neuropathic pain. Pain. 1996 Dec:68(2-3):217-27     [PubMed PMID: 9121808]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[56]

Sindrup SH, Otto M, Finnerup NB, Jensen TS. Antidepressants in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology. 2005 Jun:96(6):399-409     [PubMed PMID: 15910402]


[57]

. Duloxetine (Cymbalta) for diabetic neuropathic pain. The Medical letter on drugs and therapeutics. 2005 Aug 15-29:47(1215-1216):67-8     [PubMed PMID: 16103866]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[58]

Lunn MP, Hughes RA, Wiffen PJ. Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy or chronic pain. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2009 Oct 7:(4):CD007115. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007115.pub2. Epub 2009 Oct 7     [PubMed PMID: 19821395]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[59]

Aiyer R, Barkin RL, Bhatia A. Treatment of Neuropathic Pain with Venlafaxine: A Systematic Review. Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.). 2017 Oct 1:18(10):1999-2012. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw261. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 27837032]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[60]

Khaliq W, Alam S, Puri N. Topical lidocaine for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2007 Apr 18:(2):CD004846     [PubMed PMID: 17443559]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[61]

Derry S, Wiffen PJ, Moore RA, Quinlan J. Topical lidocaine for neuropathic pain in adults. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2014 Jul 24:2014(7):CD010958. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010958.pub2. Epub 2014 Jul 24     [PubMed PMID: 25058164]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[62]

Massey T, Derry S, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Topical NSAIDs for acute pain in adults. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2010 Jun 16:(6):CD007402. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007402.pub2. Epub 2010 Jun 16     [PubMed PMID: 20556778]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[63]

Haroutiunian S, Drennan DA, Lipman AG. Topical NSAID therapy for musculoskeletal pain. Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.). 2010 Apr:11(4):535-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00809.x. Epub 2010 Mar 4     [PubMed PMID: 20210866]


[64]

Mason L, Moore RA, Derry S, Edwards JE, McQuay HJ. Systematic review of topical capsaicin for the treatment of chronic pain. BMJ (Clinical research ed.). 2004 Apr 24:328(7446):991     [PubMed PMID: 15033881]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[65]

Xiao L, Mackey S, Hui H, Xong D, Zhang Q, Zhang D. Subcutaneous injection of botulinum toxin a is beneficial in postherpetic neuralgia. Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.). 2010 Dec:11(12):1827-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.01003.x. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 21134121]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[66]

Nugent SM, Morasco BJ, O'Neil ME, Freeman M, Low A, Kondo K, Elven C, Zakher B, Motu'apuaka M, Paynter R, Kansagara D. The Effects of Cannabis Among Adults With Chronic Pain and an Overview of General Harms: A Systematic Review. Annals of internal medicine. 2017 Sep 5:167(5):319-331. doi: 10.7326/M17-0155. Epub 2017 Aug 15     [PubMed PMID: 28806817]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[67]

Martimbianco ALC, Porfírio GJ, Pacheco RL, Torloni MR, Riera R. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic neck pain. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2019 Dec 12:12(12):CD011927. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011927.pub2. Epub 2019 Dec 12     [PubMed PMID: 31830313]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[68]

Cruccu G, Aziz TZ, Garcia-Larrea L, Hansson P, Jensen TS, Lefaucheur JP, Simpson BA, Taylor RS. EFNS guidelines on neurostimulation therapy for neuropathic pain. European journal of neurology. 2007 Sep:14(9):952-70     [PubMed PMID: 17718686]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[69]

Urits I, Callan J, Moore WC, Fuller MC, Renschler JS, Fisher P, Jung JW, Hasoon J, Eskander J, Kaye AD, Viswanath O. Cognitive behavioral therapy for the treatment of chronic pelvic pain. Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology. 2020 Sep:34(3):409-426. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2020.08.001. Epub 2020 Aug 8     [PubMed PMID: 33004156]


[70]

North RB, Kidd DH, Farrokhi F, Piantadosi SA. Spinal cord stimulation versus repeated lumbosacral spine surgery for chronic pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Neurosurgery. 2005:56(1):98-106; discussion 106-7     [PubMed PMID: 15617591]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[71]

Eldabe S, Kumar K, Buchser E, Taylor RS. An analysis of the components of pain, function, and health-related quality of life in patients with failed back surgery syndrome treated with spinal cord stimulation or conventional medical management. Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society. 2010 Jul:13(3):201-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2009.00271.x. Epub 2010 Feb 22     [PubMed PMID: 21992833]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[72]

de Vos CC, Meier K, Zaalberg PB, Nijhuis HJ, Duyvendak W, Vesper J, Enggaard TP, Lenders MW. Spinal cord stimulation in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy: a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Pain. 2014 Nov:155(11):2426-31. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2014.08.031. Epub 2014 Aug 29     [PubMed PMID: 25180016]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[73]

Hunter C, Davé N, Diwan S, Deer T. Neuromodulation of pelvic visceral pain: review of the literature and case series of potential novel targets for treatment. Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain. 2013 Jan:13(1):3-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00558.x. Epub 2012 Apr 23     [PubMed PMID: 22521096]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[74]

Kapural L, Nagem H, Tlucek H, Sessler DI. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic visceral abdominal pain. Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.). 2010 Mar:11(3):347-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00785.x. Epub 2010 Jan 15     [PubMed PMID: 20088856]


[75]

Lamer TJ, Moeschler SM, Gazelka HM, Hooten WM, Bendel MA, Murad MH. Spinal Stimulation for the Treatment of Intractable Spine and Limb Pain: A Systematic Review of RCTs and Meta-Analysis. Mayo Clinic proceedings. 2019 Aug:94(8):1475-1487. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.12.037. Epub 2019 Jul 3     [PubMed PMID: 31279543]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[76]

Najib U, Cheng EM, Halker Singh RB, Ayub N, Nelson SE, Bushard PJ, Jordan JT, Sico JJ, Turbes M, Anderson WE. AAN Position: Opioids. Neurology. 2025 May 13:104(9):e213544. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213544. Epub 2025 Apr 7     [PubMed PMID: 40193721]


[77]

Davis MP, DiScala S, Davis A. Respiratory Depression Associated with Opioids: A Narrative Review. Current treatment options in oncology. 2024 Nov:25(11):1438-1450. doi: 10.1007/s11864-024-01274-5. Epub 2024 Oct 21     [PubMed PMID: 39432171]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[78]

Jacobs D. Critical incident analysis: prescribing opioids in palliative care. International journal of palliative nursing. 2025 May 2:30(5):174-180. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2023.0065. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 40402221]


[79]

Smallwood NE, Pascoe A, Wijsenbeek M, Russell AM, Holland AE, Romero L, Ekström M. Opioids for the palliation of symptoms in people with serious respiratory illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society. 2024 Oct:33(174):. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0265-2023. Epub 2024 Oct 9     [PubMed PMID: 39384304]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[80]

Gomes T, Khuu W, Craiovan D, Martins D, Hunt J, Lee K, Tadrous M, Mamdani MM, Paterson JM, Juurlink DN. Comparing the contribution of prescribed opioids to opioid-related hospitalizations across Canada: A multi-jurisdictional cross-sectional study. Drug and alcohol dependence. 2018 Oct 1:191():86-90. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.06.028. Epub 2018 Jul 31     [PubMed PMID: 30096638]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[81]

Regina AC, Goyal A, Mechanic OJ. Opioid Toxicity. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 29262202]


[82]

Hansgen JP, Robertson ML, Verzino EM, Manning LM. Increasing Naloxone Access and Prescribing for Patients on High-Dose Opioids From a Managed Care Pharmacy Health Plan Perspective. Journal of pharmacy practice. 2024 Dec:37(6):1291-1296. doi: 10.1177/08971900241247598. Epub 2024 Apr 29     [PubMed PMID: 38685768]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[83]

Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole MR. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001 Nov:94(2):149-158. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00349-9. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 11690728]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[84]

Kemler MA, de Vet HC, Barendse GA, van den Wildenberg FA, van Kleef M. Effect of spinal cord stimulation for chronic complex regional pain syndrome Type I: five-year final follow-up of patients in a randomized controlled trial. Journal of neurosurgery. 2008 Feb:108(2):292-8. doi: 10.3171/JNS/2008/108/2/0292. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 18240925]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[85]

Watkins PB, Kaplowitz N, Slattery JT, Colonese CR, Colucci SV, Stewart PW, Harris SC. Aminotransferase elevations in healthy adults receiving 4 grams of acetaminophen daily: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006 Jul 5:296(1):87-93     [PubMed PMID: 16820551]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[86]

Holubek WJ, Kalman S, Hoffman RS. Acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure: results of a United States multicenter, prospective study. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.). 2006 Apr:43(4):880; author reply 882     [PubMed PMID: 16557558]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[87]

Jalan R, Williams R, Bernuau J. Paracetamol: are therapeutic doses entirely safe? Lancet (London, England). 2006 Dec 23:368(9554):2195-6     [PubMed PMID: 17189017]


[88]

Cavalcante AN, Sprung J, Schroeder DR, Weingarten TN. Multimodal Analgesic Therapy With Gabapentin and Its Association With Postoperative Respiratory Depression. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2017 Jul:125(1):141-146. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001719. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 27984223]


[89]

Gomes T, Greaves S, van den Brink W, Antoniou T, Mamdani MM, Paterson JM, Martins D, Juurlink DN. Pregabalin and the Risk for Opioid-Related Death: A Nested Case-Control Study. Annals of internal medicine. 2018 Nov 20:169(10):732-734. doi: 10.7326/M18-1136. Epub 2018 Aug 21     [PubMed PMID: 30140853]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[90]

Lee M, Silverman SM, Hansen H, Patel VB, Manchikanti L. A comprehensive review of opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Pain physician. 2011 Mar-Apr:14(2):145-61     [PubMed PMID: 21412369]


[91]

Hayek SM, Veizi E, Hanes M. Treatment-Limiting Complications of Percutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulator Implants: A Review of Eight Years of Experience From an Academic Center Database. Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society. 2015 Oct:18(7):603-8; discussion 608-9. doi: 10.1111/ner.12312. Epub 2015 Jun 5     [PubMed PMID: 26053499]


[92]

Deer TR, Mekhail N, Provenzano D, Pope J, Krames E, Thomson S, Raso L, Burton A, DeAndres J, Buchser E, Buvanendran A, Liem L, Kumar K, Rizvi S, Feler C, Abejon D, Anderson J, Eldabe S, Kim P, Leong M, Hayek S, McDowell G 2nd, Poree L, Brooks ES, McJunkin T, Lynch P, Kapural L, Foreman RD, Caraway D, Alo K, Narouze S, Levy RM, North R, Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee. The appropriate use of neurostimulation: avoidance and treatment of complications of neurostimulation therapies for the treatment of chronic pain. Neuromodulation Appropriateness Consensus Committee. Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society. 2014 Aug:17(6):571-97; discussion 597-8. doi: 10.1111/ner.12206. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 25112891]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[93]

Kumar K, Buchser E, Linderoth B, Meglio M, Van Buyten JP. Avoiding complications from spinal cord stimulation: practical recommendations from an international panel of experts. Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society. 2007 Jan:10(1):24-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2007.00084.x. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22151809]


[94]

Osborne MD, Ghazi SM, Palmer SC, Boone KM, Sletten CD, Nottmeier EW. Spinal cord stimulator--trial lead migration study. Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.). 2011 Feb:12(2):204-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.01019.x. Epub 2010 Dec 10     [PubMed PMID: 21143759]


[95]

Vallejo R, Kramer J, Benyamin R. Neuromodulation of the cervical spinal cord in the treatment of chronic intractable neck and upper extremity pain: a case series and review of the literature. Pain physician. 2007 Mar:10(2):305-11     [PubMed PMID: 17387353]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[96]

Wolter T, Kieselbach K. Cervical spinal cord stimulation: an analysis of 23 patients with long-term follow-up. Pain physician. 2012 May-Jun:15(3):203-12     [PubMed PMID: 22622904]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[97]

North RB, Kidd DH, Petrucci L, Dorsi MJ. Spinal cord stimulation electrode design: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing percutaneous with laminectomy electrodes: part II-clinical outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2005 Nov:57(5):990-6; discussion 990-6     [PubMed PMID: 16284568]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[98]

Henderson JM, Schade CM, Sasaki J, Caraway DL, Oakley JC. Prevention of mechanical failures in implanted spinal cord stimulation systems. Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society. 2006 Jul:9(3):183-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2006.00059.x. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22151706]


[99]

Bedder MD, Bedder HF. Spinal cord stimulation surgical technique for the nonsurgically trained. Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society. 2009 Apr:12 Suppl 1():1-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2009.00194.x. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 22151467]


[100]

Rudiger J, Thomson S. Infection rate of spinal cord stimulators after a screening trial period. A 53-month third party follow-up. Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society. 2011 Mar-Apr:14(2):136-41; discussion 141. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2010.00317.x. Epub 2010 Nov 4     [PubMed PMID: 21992200]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[101]

Cameron T. Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review. Journal of neurosurgery. 2004 Mar:100(3 Suppl Spine):254-67     [PubMed PMID: 15029914]


[102]

Turnbull DK, Shepherd DB. Post-dural puncture headache: pathogenesis, prevention and treatment. British journal of anaesthesia. 2003 Nov:91(5):718-29     [PubMed PMID: 14570796]


[103]

Costigan SN, Sprigge JS. Dural puncture: the patients' perspective. A patient survey of cases at a DGH maternity unit 1983-1993. Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 1996 Jul:40(6):710-4     [PubMed PMID: 8836266]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[104]

Petraglia FW 3rd, Farber SH, Gramer R, Verla T, Wang F, Thomas S, Parente B, Lad SP. The Incidence of Spinal Cord Injury in Implantation of Percutaneous and Paddle Electrodes for Spinal Cord Stimulation. Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society. 2016 Jan:19(1):85-90. doi: 10.1111/ner.12370. Epub 2015 Dec 8     [PubMed PMID: 26644210]


[105]

Lopez MJ, Preuss CV, Tadi P. Drug Enforcement Administration Drug Scheduling. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 32491358]


[106]

Gabay M. The federal controlled substances act: schedules and pharmacy registration. Hospital pharmacy. 2013 Jun:48(6):473-4. doi: 10.1310/hpj4806-473. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 24421507]


[107]

Larrat EP, Marcoux RM, Vogenberg FR. Implications of recent controlled substance policy initiatives. P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management. 2014 Feb:39(2):126-8     [PubMed PMID: 24669180]


[108]

Gabay M. Federal controlled substances act: controlled substances prescriptions. Hospital pharmacy. 2013 Sep:48(8):644-5. doi: 10.1310/hpj4808-644. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 24421533]


[109]

Preuss CV, Kalava A, King KC. Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 30726003]


[110]

Weyandt LL, Oster DR, Marraccini ME, Gudmundsdottir BG, Munro BA, Rathkey ES, McCallum A. Prescription stimulant medication misuse: Where are we and where do we go from here? Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology. 2016 Oct:24(5):400-414. doi: 10.1037/pha0000093. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 27690507]


[111]

Clinton HA, Hunter AA, Logan SB, Lapidus GD. Evaluating opioid overdose using the National Violent Death Reporting System, 2016. Drug and alcohol dependence. 2019 Jan 1:194():371-376. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 15     [PubMed PMID: 30481691]


[112]

Rose AJ, McBain R, Schuler MS, LaRochelle MR, Ganz DA, Kilambi V, Stein BD, Bernson D, Chui KKH, Land T, Walley AY, Stopka TJ. Effect of Age on Opioid Prescribing, Overdose, and Mortality in Massachusetts, 2011 to 2015. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2019 Jan:67(1):128-132. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15659. Epub 2018 Nov 24     [PubMed PMID: 30471102]


[113]

Jones CM, Lurie PG, Throckmorton DC. Effect of US Drug Enforcement Administration's Rescheduling of Hydrocodone Combination Analgesic Products on Opioid Analgesic Prescribing. JAMA internal medicine. 2016 Mar:176(3):399-402. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7799. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 26809459]


[114]

Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice. Schedules of controlled substances: rescheduling of hydrocodone combination products from schedule III to schedule II. Final rule. Federal register. 2014 Aug 22:79(163):49661-82     [PubMed PMID: 25167591]


[115]

Chen JH, Humphreys K, Shah NH, Lembke A. Distribution of Opioids by Different Types of Medicare Prescribers. JAMA internal medicine. 2016 Feb:176(2):259-61. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.6662. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 26658497]