Back To Search Results

EMS Care Teams In Disaster Response

Editor: Joshua W. Loyd Updated: 7/6/2025 11:46:26 PM

Introduction

Team-based care is a critical component of medical response during disasters. Repeated experiences with natural and human-made disasters underscore the need for an organized, system-wide approach to disaster medical care. When a disaster exceeds local capacity, external assistance becomes essential. Many countries maintain disaster response systems that scale across local, regional, and national levels. These systems often center on dedicated disaster teams, whose composition, objectives, and specialization vary from country to country.

Initial responses usually involve local or regional emergency medical services (EMS) or medical assistance teams. Specialized teams, such as surgical response units, search and rescue teams, or mortuary support teams, may be deployed as necessary. Clinicians should understand the disaster response levels in their region and the command structures that coordinate these efforts.[1][2][3][4][5]

Issues of Concern

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Issues of Concern

Local Response

Local responders form the foundation of initial disaster response efforts in both the U.S. and Europe. These efforts often begin at the scene, where community members or bystanders may act as immediate responders, providing lifesaving interventions such as bleeding control before professional help arrives.

The formal medical response typically begins with local EMS, including emergency medical technicians (EMTs) and paramedics. Local authorities manage the incident and request additional support when necessary.

In the U.S., locally organized disaster teams include the Medical Reserve Corps (MRC) and Community Emergency Response Teams (CERTs). The MRC comprises hundreds of teams nationwide, often consisting of active or retired nurses, EMTs, paramedics, nursing assistants, physicians, pharmacists, and public health professionals. CERT members may come from both medical and nonmedical backgrounds.

These volunteer teams receive structured training and may be activated to support a wide range of disaster response roles. These roles include providing medical care, assisting with mass vaccination efforts, offering first aid at large events, monitoring health at disaster shelters, and performing nonmedical support tasks.[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]

State and Regional Response

When a disaster exceeds local capacity, the next level of response is typically coordinated at the state or regional level. In the U.S., each of the 50 states maintains an emergency management agency responsible for planning, training, and coordinating both local and state-level responses. In both the U.S. and Europe, the structure of regional and state responses varies by jurisdiction. However, coordination generally takes place through a regional or state emergency operations center or agency.

In the U.S., state emergency management agencies organize response teams that may include the National Guard, EMS districts, public health departments, and nongovernmental organizations such as the Red Cross. Some states also maintain dedicated State Medical Assistance Teams (SMATs), which may be deployed to support disaster response efforts. While SMATs vary in structure and capability by state, they are typically composed of trained volunteers and are designed to deliver rapid medical support in disaster settings.[14][15]

Federal Response

When large-scale or regional disasters exceed local and state capacity, a federal response may be initiated at the request of state authorities. In the U.S., governors can request a federal disaster declaration, which the president must approve. Once declared, federal medical resources become available to support response efforts.

The National Response Framework (NRF) defines the federal government’s approach to disaster management. Public health and medical services fall under Emergency Support Function No. 8 (ESF-8), coordinated by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) through the National Disaster Medical System (NDMS).

The NDMS oversees a range of specialized disaster response teams. These teams include the Disaster Medical Assistance Team (DMAT), the Disaster Mortuary Operational Response Team (DMORT), the National Veterinary Response Team (NVRT), and the Trauma Critical Care Team (TCCT). Additional teams include the Victim Identification Center Team (VIC), the Federal Medical Station (FMS) Support Team, the National Nurse Response Team (NNRT), the National Pharmacist Response Team (NPRT), the Burn Specialty Team, the Behavioral Health Response Unit, and various Logistics and Technical Support Units.

DMATs are typically deployed within days and can establish freestanding medical treatment sites. A standard 35-member DMAT comprises physicians, physician assistants, nurses, pharmacists, paramedics, EMTs, and personnel responsible for logistics and communications. When activated, members serve as intermittent federal employees. Each team arrives with its own personnel, shelter, supplies, and medications, and remains fully self-sustaining for up to 72 hours.

Other NDMS teams provide specialized capabilities. DMORTs offer forensic and mortuary services during mass fatality events, supported by VIC teams. NVRTs focus on animal health and zoonotic disease surveillance. TCCTs deliver advanced trauma and critical care, often including surgical capacity. FMS Support Teams operate temporary shelters for low-acuity patients. NNRTs and NPRTs support mass prophylaxis, vaccination, and medication distribution. Burn teams and Behavioral Health Units address specific clinical needs, while Logistics and Technical Support Units ensure operational continuity throughout deployments.

Similar models exist internationally. In Japan, 5- to 6-member DMATs may deploy and remain self-sufficient for up to 3 days. In Israel, disaster response integrates both military and civilian reservists. In Turkey, 5-member NMRTs deliver specialized care tailored to regional risk. Although federal-level response models vary across countries, they are typically reserved for large-scale or complex disasters.

Nongovernmental Organizations

Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) constitute a significant part of the disaster response and recovery workforce. The contributions of these groups are essential to supporting affected communities. Although the overall management of a disaster remains the responsibility of government authorities, NGOs often operate within this framework to deliver critical services such as health care, shelter, and long-term recovery assistance.

NGOs are typically independent of government oversight, are primarily composed of volunteers, and operate on a nonprofit basis. Prominent examples include the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC), the American Red Cross, and Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders).

Note on the International Committee of the Red Cross

Although often grouped with nongovernmental humanitarian actors, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) holds a distinct legal status. Unlike conventional NGOs, the ICRC is an independent, neutral organization with a formal mandate under the Geneva Conventions to protect and assist victims of armed conflict. The ICRC plays a central role in International Humanitarian Law, particularly in conflict zones, and serves as a core component of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement, alongside the IFRC and national societies.

Clinical Significance

Disaster care teams support response efforts from the initial impact through the recovery phase. The first response, often by community members or local EMS, can occur within minutes. State or regional resources may require hours to mobilize, while federal support, such as DMATs, may take several days to arrive.

In the U.S., all levels of disaster response operate under a unified framework known as the Incident Command System (ICS). The ICS coordinates emergency operations across key functions: command, operations, logistics, planning, finance, and administration. Understanding ICS operations and how disaster care teams integrate into this structure is essential for effective response.

Clinicians involved in disaster care must recognize the levels of response and follow the ICS-defined chain of command. Preparedness to adapt to austere environments and evolving needs is essential. Familiarity with available disaster teams and ICS principles ensures an effective response within the hospital or community.

References


[1]

Gainey CE, Brown HA, Gerard WC. Utilization of Mobile Integrated Health Providers During a Flood Disaster in South Carolina (USA). Prehospital and disaster medicine. 2018 Aug:33(4):432-435. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X18000572. Epub 2018 Jul 17     [PubMed PMID: 30012235]


[2]

Brandrud AS, Bretthauer M, Brattebø G, Pedersen MJ, Håpnes K, Møller K, Bjorge T, Nyen B, Strauman L, Schreiner A, Haldorsen GS, Bergli M, Nelson E, Morgan TS, Hjortdahl P. Local emergency medical response after a terrorist attack in Norway: a qualitative study. BMJ quality & safety. 2017 Oct:26(10):806-816. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006517. Epub 2017 Jul 4     [PubMed PMID: 28676492]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[3]

Mortelmans LJM, Gaakeer MI, Dieltiens G, Anseeuw K, Sabbe MB. Are Dutch Hospitals Prepared for Chemical, Biological, or Radionuclear Incidents? A Survey Study. Prehospital and disaster medicine. 2017 Oct:32(5):483-491. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17006513. Epub 2017 May 8     [PubMed PMID: 28478772]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[4]

Goldhaber-Fiebert SN, Pollock J, Howard SK, Bereknyei Merrell S. Emergency Manual Uses During Actual Critical Events and Changes in Safety Culture From the Perspective of Anesthesia Residents: A Pilot Study. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2016 Sep:123(3):641-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001445. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 27541721]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[5]

Aruru M, Truong HA, Clark S. Pharmacy Emergency Preparedness and Response (PEPR): a proposed framework for expanding pharmacy professionals' roles and contributions to emergency preparedness and response during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Research in social & administrative pharmacy : RSAP. 2021 Jan:17(1):1967-1977. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.04.002. Epub 2020 Apr 10     [PubMed PMID: 32389631]


[6]

Mechem CC, Bossert R, Baldini C. Rapid Assessment Medical Support (RAMS) for active shooter incidents. Prehospital emergency care. 2015 Apr-Jun:19(2):213-7. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.959227. Epub 2014 Oct 7     [PubMed PMID: 25291188]


[7]

Zimmer M, Wassmer R, Latasch L, Oberndörfer D, Wilken V, Ackermann H, Breitkreutz R. Initiation of risk management: incidence of failures in simulated Emergency Medical Service scenarios. Resuscitation. 2010 Jul:81(7):882-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.03.009. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 20435394]


[8]

Niska RW. Hospital collaboration with public safety organizations on bioterrorism response. Prehospital emergency care. 2008 Jan-Mar:12(1):12-7. doi: 10.1080/10903120701709514. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 18189171]


[9]

Klein KR, Nagel NE. Mass medical evacuation: Hurricane Katrina and nursing experiences at the New Orleans airport. Disaster management & response : DMR : an official publication of the Emergency Nurses Association. 2007 Apr-Jun:5(2):56-61     [PubMed PMID: 17517364]


[10]

Khorram-Manesh A, Plegas P, Högstedt Å, Peyravi M, Carlström E. Immediate response to major incidents: defining an immediate responder! European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society. 2020 Dec:46(6):1309-1320. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01133-1. Epub 2019 Apr 5     [PubMed PMID: 30953109]


[11]

Beyrami Jam M, Aminizadeh M, Akbari-Shahrestanaki Y, Khankeh HR. Evaluating the disaster preparedness of emergency medical services (EMS) facilities: a cross-sectional investigation in Iran. BMC emergency medicine. 2024 Mar 25:24(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00932-z. Epub 2024 Mar 25     [PubMed PMID: 38523286]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[12]

Rush SC, Lauria MJ, DeSoucy ES, Koch EJ, Kamler JJ, Remley MA, Alway N, Brodie F, Barendregt P, Miller K, Hines R, Champagne M, Paladino L, Shackelford SA, Miles EA, Dorlac WC, Gurney JM, Robb D, Kue RC. Rethinking Prehospital Response to Mass Casualty Events: Move, Treat, and Transport. Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals. 2024 Oct 2:24(3):24-29. doi: 10.55460/X38F-P3RH. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 39271298]


[13]

Peace S, Brown JF, Mercer M. Project RESPOND: Development of a New Capacity in Disaster Response. Disaster medicine and public health preparedness. 2024 Sep 5:18():e101. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2024.84. Epub 2024 Sep 5     [PubMed PMID: 39233463]


[14]

Feldman MJ, Lukins JL, Verbeek RP, MacDonald RD, Burgess RJ, Schwartz B. Half-a-million strong: the emergency medical services response to a single-day, mass-gathering event. Prehospital and disaster medicine. 2004 Oct-Dec:19(4):287-96     [PubMed PMID: 15645624]


[15]

Levitin HW, Siegelson HJ. Hazardous materials. Disaster medical planning and response. Emergency medicine clinics of North America. 1996 May:14(2):327-48     [PubMed PMID: 8635411]