Occupational Safety and Health Administration Rules That Affect Healthcare
Definition/Introduction
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is a division of the United States Department of Labor. OSHA was established by the United States Congress under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, which was signed into law by President Richard Nixon on December 29, 1970. OSHA's primary mission is to promote safe and healthy working environments for employees across the nation. The agency accomplishes this by developing and enforcing safety standards and offering resources such as training programs, educational initiatives, outreach efforts, and technical assistance to support both employers and workers.[1]
OSHA plays a vital role in the healthcare sector by establishing and enforcing standards that address the specific risks faced by healthcare professionals.[2][3] Through its various standards, OSHA requires hospitals and healthcare facilities to implement comprehensive exposure control plans and promote strategies to reduce musculoskeletal injuries among nurses and other healthcare providers. OSHA encourages the use of mechanical lifts, transfer aids, and evidence-based movement protocols to minimize physical strain and support safe patient mobility. The agency also establishes requirements to implement programs for workplace violence prevention and emergency preparedness, ensuring a safe and healthy work environment. These safety protocols protect the health and well-being of healthcare professionals, enhance overall operational efficiency, reduce costs associated with worker injuries and illnesses, and improve the quality of care provided to patients.[4]
Despite its critical role, OSHA faces several significant limitations that affect its ability to fully protect healthcare professionals and other employees. Limited funding and staffing restrict the number of workplace inspections and the agency's ability to enforce standards. Many existing standards are outdated and do not address emerging hazards in healthcare settings. Developing and updating standards can be slow and face political and industry opposition, often requiring years to enact change. Minimal civil and criminal penalties are often ineffective deterrents to prevent employers from cutting corners on safety. These factors, along with the evolving demographics of the modern workforce, such as independent contractors and per diem workers who fall outside OSHA protection rules, create significant gaps in employee coverage.[5] These limitations underscore the ongoing need for advocacy, policy reform, and interprofessional collaboration to enhance workplace protections and ensure safer working conditions for all workers, including those in the healthcare sector.[6]
Issues of Concern
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Search engine and full access to all medical articles
10 free questions in your specialty
Free CME/CE Activities
Free daily question in your email
Save favorite articles to your dashboard
Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Issues of Concern
According to data from the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, the total number of recordable injuries and illnesses documented in the private industry healthcare and social assistance sector declined from 665,300 in 2022 to 562,500 in 2023.[7] This decline translates to an injury and illness rate of 3.6 cases per 100 full-time-equivalent workers, which is lower than the rate of 4.5 in 2022. Additionally, the adoption of safety standards has substantially reduced overall workplace fatalities, lowering the daily average from approximately 38 deaths in 1970 to 15 per day by 2023. Despite this progress, workplace incidents still result in more than 5000 deaths annually.[2] Data from the Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries indicate that, unlike the overall workforce, the rate of job-related fatalities among healthcare professionals has not consistently declined year over year.
Healthcare professionals face numerous safety concerns in the workplace that fall under OSHA's responsibility to ensure a safe environment. Biological hazards pose a significant risk with exposure to bloodborne pathogens such as HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C.[8][9] OSHA's Bloodborne Pathogens Standard requires employers to establish exposure control plans, provide training, implement engineering and work practice controls, and offer hepatitis B vaccinations to employees at risk.[10][11]
A recent study found that exposure most commonly occurs during treatment, waste disposal, and needle recapping. Despite repeated training on safety precautions, the rate of percutaneous needlestick and sharp-object injuries, as well as contact with blood or body fluids, remained 34.1 per 1000 healthcare workers over an 8-year period.[12] Despite intermittent training, the incidence did not decrease, indicating the need for a multipronged approach, including the use of safety needles. Additional exposure to infectious agents in healthcare settings necessitates the implementation of comprehensive infection control measures and exposure control plans.
Physical hazards, including slips, trips, and falls, as well as injuries from lifting and moving patients or equipment, are another common concern. The General Duty Clause requires employers to address these risks to prevent musculoskeletal injuries. Recent data reveal that healthcare professionals are 5 times more likely to sustain a musculoskeletal injury compared to workers in other fields. A meta-analysis reports that the annual prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among nurses is 77.2%.[13]
Workplace violence is a significant threat, with healthcare professionals 5 times more likely to be injured by violence compared to those in other industries. In 2018, healthcare professionals accounted for 73% of all nonfatal workplace injuries and illnesses related to violence. The number of such incidents in the healthcare sector has continued to increase steadily since 2011.[14][15] OSHA encourages employers to adopt zero-tolerance policies and prevention programs.[16]
OSHA's Hazard Communication Standard requires employers to educate healthcare staff about the risks and safe handling practices associated with chemical hazards, such as exposure to disinfectants and chemotherapy drugs. Equipment and facility safety also require attention, with OSHA mandating the use of appropriate personal protective equipment, adherence to electrical safety standards, and the development of comprehensive emergency preparedness plans. Additionally, OSHA requires employers to record injuries and illnesses and report them promptly to ensure accountability and ongoing safety improvements in healthcare settings.[17]
With the constantly changing healthcare industry, OSHA continues to face several significant challenges in ensuring the safety of healthcare professionals. The development of new standards is often slow, requires significant resources, and faces political and industrial opposition. These limitations result in few updates to address modern hazards such as biological threats, chemical exposures, or new technologies commonly found in healthcare settings.
Further limiting OSHA is the lack of resources and funding. With an annual budget of less than $600 million, far lower than that of other federal agencies, such as the Environmental Protection Agency, which boasts an annual budget of greater than $8 billion, inspecting all workplaces, enforcing regulations consistently, and responding promptly to safety concerns pose significant challenges.[2] The lack of stringent measures and consequences when employers are penalized does little to deter employers in the long term. Penalties for noncompliance are relatively weak, with modest fines and limited criminal sanctions that may fail to deter some employers from neglecting their safety obligations. As a result, employees can be left vulnerable when workplace protections exist on paper but are not enforced in practice.
Structural changes in the workforce also pose challenges. Compared to 1970, fewer workers are unionized today, and many are independent contractors or self-employed individuals, which puts them outside OSHA's traditional jurisdiction. In healthcare, the evolving roles and responsibilities of advanced clinicians and other team members can make it more challenging to ensure that existing standards adequately cover all risks.[18]
Healthcare facilities also face specific compliance challenges. Workplace violence and other injuries often remain underreported, with studies indicating incidences ranging between 13% and 85%.[12] Additionally, reviews of common citations show that full compliance with all of OSHA's standards remains challenging. Addressing these limitations through improved funding, updated standards, better enforcement, and focused training can help create safer environments for healthcare professionals.
Clinical Significance
The strengths and limitations of OSHA regulations in healthcare settings have direct clinical implications for patients. When effectively implemented, safety standards help ensure that healthcare professionals remain healthy, reducing absenteeism and turnover. These factors support better continuity of care and stronger patient-provider relationships. Preventing occupational exposures to bloodborne pathogens and infectious agents protects both staff and patients from disease transmission and reduces the risk of health care–associated infections. Ergonomic safety protocols that reduce staff injuries enable caregivers to assist patients with mobility safely and effectively, thereby decreasing the likelihood of patient falls or injuries during transfers. Violence prevention programs create safer and calmer care environments, which is especially important for vulnerable patients in settings such as emergency departments or psychiatric units.
Underfunding, outdated standards, and weak enforcement compromise the safety and well-being of both healthcare professionals and patients. Staff who are injured, fearful, or inadequately trained are less equipped to provide attentive, high-quality care and are more at risk of errors and transmitting infections. Therefore, strengthening occupational safety standards and enforcement protects healthcare professionals and promotes safer, more reliable, patient-centered care.
Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Interventions
Effective implementation of OSHA standards in healthcare relies on the shared skills, strategies, and ethical responsibilities of clinicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, pharmacists, and other healthcare professionals working collaboratively. Each team member must understand and apply safety protocols related to bloodborne pathogen exposure, chemical handling, and ergonomic practices, demonstrating the skills to model safe behaviors and train others. Clinicians must proactively assess workplace risks, integrate safety checklists into their workflows, and ensure that exposure control plans and emergency preparedness protocols are regularly updated and maintained.
Interprofessional communication among team members is crucial for sharing information about potential hazards, ensuring the consistent use of personal protective equipment, and safely handling situations involving workplace violence or exposure. All team members should collaborate to maintain a safe environment, including organizing vaccination programs, implementing infection control measures, and preparing for emergencies. Pharmacists contribute by overseeing the secure storage and handling of hazardous drugs and educating staff on these procedures. Nurses often lead the front lines, identifying risks in everyday care and suggesting ergonomic changes that make the work environment safer for both staff and patients.
References
Silverstein M. Getting home safe and sound: occupational safety and health administration at 38. American journal of public health. 2008 Mar:98(3):416-23. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.117382. Epub 2008 Jan 30 [PubMed PMID: 18235060]
Michaels D, Barab J. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration at 50: Protecting Workers in a Changing Economy. American journal of public health. 2020 May:110(5):631-635. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.305597. Epub 2020 Mar 19 [PubMed PMID: 32191515]
Raltz S, Kozarek RA, Kim-Deobald J, Pethigal P, Moorhouse MA. The impact of OSHA regulations on nursing care cost and compliance. Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates. 1994 Nov-Dec:17(3):106-9 [PubMed PMID: 7858002]
Dini G, Rahmani A, Montecucco A, Kusznir Vitturi B, Zacconi S, Manca A, Blasi C, Linares R, Morganti M, Bragazzi NL, Razzino A, Durando P. Occupational Injuries and Their Determinants Among Healthcare Workers in Western Countries: A Scoping Review. La Medicina del lavoro. 2025 Feb 21:116(1):. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v116i1.16664. Epub 2025 Feb 21 [PubMed PMID: 39992194]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceDavis KG, Freeman AM, Ying J, Huth JR. Workers' compensation costs for healthcare caregivers: Home healthcare, long-term care, and hospital nurses and nursing aides. American journal of industrial medicine. 2021 May:64(5):369-380. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23237. Epub 2021 Feb 22 [PubMed PMID: 33616226]
Aljabri D, Vaughn A, Austin M, White L, Li Z, Naessens J, Spaulding A. An Investigation of Healthcare Worker Perception of Their Workplace Safety and Incidence of Injury. Workplace health & safety. 2020 May:68(5):214-225. doi: 10.1177/2165079919883293. Epub 2020 Jan 26 [PubMed PMID: 31983297]
Medeni İ, Alagüney ME, Medeni V. Occupational injuries among healthcare workers: a nationwide study in Turkey. Frontiers in public health. 2024:12():1505331. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1505331. Epub 2024 Dec 5 [PubMed PMID: 39703481]
Medeni V, Çetintepe SP, Medeni İ, Özdemir Öztel H, Bozdağ F, Uğraş Dikmen A. Occupational Injuries Among Hospital Workers: A Retrospective Study in Turkey. Journal of clinical medicine. 2025 Feb 7:14(4):. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041050. Epub 2025 Feb 7 [PubMed PMID: 40004581]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceDebelu D, Mengistu DA, Tolera ST, Aschalew A, Deriba W. Occupational-Related Injuries and Associated Risk Factors Among Healthcare Workers Working in Developing Countries: A Systematic Review. Health services research and managerial epidemiology. 2023 Jan-Dec:10():23333928231192834. doi: 10.1177/23333928231192834. Epub 2023 Aug 22 [PubMed PMID: 37636487]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceCuming R, Rocco TS, McEachern AG. Improving compliance with Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards. AORN journal. 2008 Feb:87(2):347-56; quiz 357-60 [PubMed PMID: 18323024]
. OSHA's bloodborne pathogens standard: analysis and recommendations. Health devices. 1993 Feb:22(2):35-92 [PubMed PMID: 8444629]
Erturk Sengel B, Tukenmez Tigen E, Bilgin H, Dogru A, Korten V. Occupation-Related Injuries Among Healthcare Workers: Incidence, Risk Groups, and the Effect of Training. Cureus. 2021 Apr 6:13(4):e14318. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14318. Epub 2021 Apr 6 [PubMed PMID: 33968528]
Sun W, Yin L, Zhang T, Zhang H, Zhang R, Cai W. Prevalence of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders among Nurses: A Meta-Analysis. Iranian journal of public health. 2023 Mar:52(3):463-475. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v52i3.12130. Epub [PubMed PMID: 37124897]
Level 1 (high-level) evidenceHawkins D, Chavarria AL. Fatal Injuries in the Health Care and Social Assistance Industry, Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries, 2011 to 2019. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine. 2023 Feb 1:65(2):167-171. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002708. Epub 2022 Oct 3 [PubMed PMID: 36190911]
Carey I, Hendricks K. Workplace violence against healthcare workers using nationally representative estimates of emergency department data, 2015-2017. American journal of industrial medicine. 2023 Apr:66(4):333-338. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23463. Epub 2023 Feb 1 [PubMed PMID: 36726213]
. OSHA issues guidelines to protect healthcare workers from violence. Patient accounts. 1996 Jun:19(6):1, 3 [PubMed PMID: 10158365]
Khairallah GM, Al-Hajj S, Mowafi H, Rahme DV, Sakr CJ. Occupational injury severity among healthcare workers: a retrospective study. BMC public health. 2025 Apr 17:25(1):1447. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22727-y. Epub 2025 Apr 17 [PubMed PMID: 40247310]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceLavoue J, Friesen MC, Burstyn I. Workplace measurements by the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration since 1979: descriptive analysis and potential uses for exposure assessment. The Annals of occupational hygiene. 2013 Jan:57(1):77-97. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mes055. Epub 2012 Sep 5 [PubMed PMID: 22952385]