Introduction
The methacholine challenge test is a bronchoprovocation test used to assess airway hyperresponsiveness and aid in the diagnosis of asthma. Methacholine, a derivative of acetylcholine, directly stimulates airway smooth muscle receptors, leading to bronchoconstriction. This test is instrumental in diagnosing asthma, especially in patients with atypical presentations or persistent symptoms despite normal baseline spirometry.[1] In some cases, airway hyperresponsiveness may be the only measurable indicator of asthma. Bronchoprovocation testing helps evaluate the severity of airway sensitivity and the patient's response to therapy. Among various bronchoprovocation methods, the methacholine challenge is the most commonly used. Other agents and techniques include bradykinin, mannitol, adenosine monophosphate, hypertonic saline, histamine, exercise, eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea, and antigen-specific challenges, such as aspirin or food additives.[2] Due to the limited commercial availability and adverse effects, clinicians primarily use histamine for research purposes.[3][4]
The methacholine challenge test involves administering progressively higher doses of methacholine, with spirometry performed after each dose to monitor forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1).[5] A reduction in FEV1 of 20% or more indicates a positive response. The methacholine dose required to produce this effect is the provocative dose (PD20). Typically, a PD20 of 200 µg, a provocative concentration (PC20) of 8 mg/mL, or a 35% to 40% reduction in specific airway conductance (sGaw) is considered a positive result, indicating heightened airway sensitivity. Clinicians must interpret negative results within the context of the patient's history, as a negative result does not completely exclude the diagnosis of asthma. Use of medications that reduce airway responsiveness, poor patient effort, patients with occupational asthma without recent exposure, and patients with exercise-induced asthma who are not sensitive to methacholine may all have negative results.[6]
Anatomy and Physiology
Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Search engine and full access to all medical articles
10 free questions in your specialty
Free CME/CE Activities
Free daily question in your email
Save favorite articles to your dashboard
Emails offering discounts
Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care
Anatomy and Physiology
Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways characterized by airflow obstruction, hyperresponsiveness, and remodeling, leading to symptoms such as coughing, wheezing, chest tightness, and shortness of breath. The pathophysiology involves a complex interplay of airway inflammation, bronchoconstriction, and increased mucus production. Airway hyperresponsiveness is a central component of the underlying pathophysiology of asthma. Because asthma symptoms can fluctuate, not all patients exhibit abnormalities noted on initial pulmonary function tests.
Methacholine is a nonselective muscarinic receptor agonist that acts directly on airway smooth muscle receptors to induce bronchoconstriction.[7] Methacholine also indirectly stimulates mucus cell secretion. Methacholine is more useful for testing than acetylcholine due to its longer duration of action.[3]
Indications
Indications for bronchoprovocation testing are as follows:
- Patients with typical asthma symptoms and normal pulmonary function tests with no response to bronchodilators.
- Patients with nonspecific symptoms potentially caused by asthma, such as an isolated cough.
- Patients who require testing for medicolegal reasons, such as those suspected of having occupational asthma.
- Assessing a patient's response to therapy.
- Identifying potential triggers of a patient's asthma.
- As a screening test for scuba divers, military personnel, or other patients in whom asthma may cause significant personal risk.
- Patients with atypical symptoms, such as difficulty sleeping or speaking, and anxiety or panic, not due to other identifiable causes.[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]
Contraindications
Contraindications to methacholine testing include:
- Allergy to the challenge agent
- Presence of significant airflow obstruction, typically an FEV1 less than 60% predicted for adults and children or 1.5 L for adults
- Inability to consistently reproduce quality spirometry
- Recent myocardial infarction or stroke within the past 3 months
- Unstable cardiovascular disease
- Uncontrolled hypertension
- Known aortic aneurysm
- Recent upper respiratory infection
- Recent ophthalmologic surgery
- Patients at risk for intracranial pressure elevation [5][16]
In younger patients with smaller airway caliber, hypoxemia is a concern. However, pulse oximetry (SaO2) and transcutaneous oxygen pressure allow for safe testing. Methacholine is a pregnancy category C drug, and no studies are available to determine whether methacholine is excreted in breast milk or is associated with fetal abnormalities.[17]
Equipment
Essential equipment for methacholine challenge testing includes:
- Spirometer
- Nose clips
- Timer
- A chair with armrests for the patient
- Nebulization apparatus to administer aerosolized methacholine at an output of 0.13 mL/min
- Preparations of varying concentrations of methacholine
- Vials and holders for methacholine
- A refrigerator to hold the different concentrations of methacholine
- Diluent or saline
- Emergency supplies, including oxygen; bronchodilators such as albuterol; defibrillator; epinephrine; atropine; lidocaine; corticosteroids; bag valve mask; stethoscope; sphygmomanometer; and pulse oximeter [5][16]
Personnel
Skilled technicians are crucial in guiding patients through the correct breathing maneuvers required for spirometry and accurate FEV1 measurement. Poor technique can compromise test validity. Once methacholine administration begins, the patient should not be left unattended at any point. A clinician or other qualified healthcare provider capable of managing acute bronchospasm must be readily available to respond immediately in case of an emergency. Appropriately trained personnel must be present to ensure both patient safety and test accuracy.
Preparation
Healthcare professionals must instruct patients to avoid alcohol for at least 4 hours and refrain from smoking for at least 1 hour before testing. Different asthma medications can alter test results, and clinicians may need to discontinue some medications before testing. In general, asthma medications, except bronchodilators such as inhaled and oral corticosteroids and leukotriene modifiers, are not discontinued before testing if the purpose is to evaluate the patient's response to therapy or to determine whether the patient's current symptoms are related to asthma.[18] Given the high sensitivity of the test, a negative test result for patients on inhaled corticosteroids strongly suggests that their current symptoms are not caused by asthma. However, these results cannot exclude a diagnosis of underlying asthma. If the clinician needs testing to be done without the anti-inflammatory effects of these medications, testing should be performed after a 4-week discontinuation period. Caffeine and caffeine-related products, such as chocolate and antihistamines, do not affect test results. The following list includes the minimum time necessary to omit asthma medications before bronchoprovocation testing:
- Albuterol: 6 h
- Levalbuterol: 6 h
- Terbutaline: 6 h
- Formoterol and salmeterol: 36 h
- Ultra long-acting beta-agonists: 48 h
- Short-acting muscarinic antagonist such as ipratropium: 12 h
- Long-acting muscarinic antagonists such as aclidinium, glycopyrrolate, and tiotropium: 1 week
- Theophylline: 24 h
- Oral albuterol: 12 to 24 h
- Oral glucocorticoids: 2 to 3 weeks
- Cromolyn sodium: 4 h
- Leukotriene modifiers: 4 weeks
- Inhaled glucocorticoids: 4 weeks
Technique or Treatment
The following outlines the steps involved in performing a methacholine challenge test:
- Prepare methacholine solutions in sterile vials at appropriate concentrations. Store the vials in a refrigerator and remove them 30 minutes before testing to allow the sample to warm to room temperature. The tester administers methacholine sequentially in increasing concentrations, ranging from 0.016 to 16 mg/mL, using 2- to 4-fold dilutions.
- Perform pretest spirometry to confirm that the patient can adequately perform spirometry and that the baseline airflow limitation is acceptable for the test.
- Add 3 mL of diluent to the nebulizer, apply the nose clip, and administer to the patient, ensuring at least 1 minute of quiet tidal volume breathing. Alternatively, 5 vital capacity breaths followed by a breath hold is another option. However, quiet tidal volume breathing provides a higher sensitivity.[19]
- Perform post-diluent spirometry at 30 and 90 seconds, measuring FEV1 and forced vital capacity (FVC). The tester must adequately coach the patient to ensure quality measurements. If FEV1 is the only measurement, the tester can shorten the expiratory effort to 2 seconds instead of 6 seconds. However, if the clinician suspects vocal cord dysfunction, the tester should perform complete FVC breathing maneuvers with analysis of both the inspiratory and expiratory phases.[20] The diluent should not cause a significant change in FEV1 from pre-diluent spirometry. If the FEV1 change is less than 10%, the patient can receive the first dose of methacholine. A change in FEV1 of 10% to 20% warrants repeating the diluent trial. A decrease in FEV1 of 20% or more requires cancellation of the test. The post-diluent FEV1 serves as the baseline.
- Following methacholine administration, repeat spirometry at 30 and 90 seconds. If the FEV1 falls by less than 20%, administer the next dose of methacholine and repeat spirometry and FEV1 measurements. The tester increases the dose stepwise until the FEV1 drops by more than 20%. The methacholine dose corresponding to a greater than 20% drop in FEV1 is the provocation dose (PD20)—also known as the provocation concentration (PC20) expressed in mg/mL. A 35% to 40% reduction in sGaw, a measure of airway resistance, is an alternative endpoint for patients with difficulty performing spirometry.
- Once the patient experiences a decrease in FEV1 of 20% or more, note their symptoms and administer a fast-acting bronchodilator. Repeat spirometry after 5 to 10 minutes. Ensure the patient's FEV1 returns to baseline before discharge.[5]
A test is considered positive if PD20 is less than or equal to 200 µg or if PC20 is less than or equal to 8 mg/mL. When using sGaw, a concentration of 100 µg or 4 mg/mL or less indicates a positive test result. A test is negative if the PD20 is greater than 400 µg or the PC20 is greater than 16 mg/mL.
An additional proposed grading system based on the PC20 categorizes degrees of hyperresponsiveness as follows:
- Normal: >16 mg/mL
- Borderline: 4.0-16 mg/mL
- Mild: 1.0-4.0 mg/mL
- Moderate to severe: <1.0 mg/mL [5][16]
However, the clinical utility of this system has yet to be determined.
Clinical Significance
Methacholine challenge testing is a nonspecific bronchoprovocation tool primarily used to evaluate patients with an uncertain diagnosis of asthma. The test is most appropriate when baseline spirometry is normal but the clinical history raises suspicion for asthma.[21][22] The test is highly sensitive and has a strong negative predictive value, making it particularly valuable for ruling out the diagnosis of asthma. A positive result may support a diagnosis of asthma; however, the test has a limited positive predictive value, making it more reliable for excluding than confirming the diagnosis.[23]
Clinicians should be cautious, as false positives can occur in other conditions, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, bronchitis, allergic rhinitis, and cystic fibrosis. Up to 7% of asymptomatic individuals may have a positive test, a normal variant, or an indicator of imperceptible symptoms. In contrast, a negative methacholine challenge in a patient with symptoms suggestive of asthma should prompt evaluation for alternative diagnoses, such as inducible laryngeal obstruction (vocal cord dysfunction), occupational asthma, or central airway obstruction from tumors, polyps, or foreign bodies.[3][21] Because asthma symptoms wax and wane, and patients with occupational asthma may be asymptomatic if they have been off work for some time, clinicians may need to repeat testing when the patient is symptomatic.
Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes
Methacholine challenge testing is a nonspecific bronchoprovocation method used to assess airway hyperresponsiveness, aiding in the diagnosis of asthma, particularly when baseline spirometry is normal but clinical suspicion remains. Methacholine, a cholinergic agonist, induces bronchoconstriction by stimulating airway smooth muscle receptors. The test involves administering increasing doses of methacholine with serial spirometry to measure FEV1. A drop in FEV1 of 20% or more indicates a positive result. This highly sensitive test has a strong negative predictive value, making it especially useful for ruling out asthma. However, due to the potential for false positives in conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and allergic rhinitis, results should be interpreted in the context of the overall clinical picture. Emergency resuscitation equipment and trained personnel must be present during testing to manage potential bronchospasm.
Effective methacholine challenge testing relies on a coordinated interprofessional approach to ensure patient safety, diagnostic accuracy, and optimal clinical outcomes. Clinicians and advanced practitioners play a central role in determining the appropriateness of the test, educating patients about its purpose, and interpreting the results within the broader clinical picture. These healthcare professionals must manage acute bronchospasm or adverse effects that may occur during the procedure. Nurses and respiratory therapists play a critical role in patient preparation, ensuring that they clearly communicate instructions and that patients perform reproducible spirometric maneuvers, which are essential for test validity. These team members also continuously monitor the patient throughout the procedure for signs of respiratory compromise and must be available to respond promptly to emergencies. Pharmacists contribute by ensuring the availability of methacholine at the appropriate dilutions, reviewing medications that may interfere with testing, and ensuring the availability of rescue agents, such as short-acting beta-agonists. Transparent, real-time communication among all healthcare professionals is crucial for coordinating care, managing risks, and optimizing patient outcomes. A shared understanding of each team member's role fosters mutual accountability, enhances team performance, and supports patient-centered care throughout the testing process.
Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Interventions
Clinicians perform methacholine challenge testing with the support of a trained nurse who plays a key role in ensuring patient safety and comprehension. Before the procedure, the nurse confirms that informed consent is signed, the patient understands the purpose and process of the test, and that all necessary resuscitation equipment, including bronchodilators, is readily available in the testing area. Throughout the procedure, the nurse closely monitors the patient's vital signs and observes for any signs of respiratory distress. After the procedure, the nurse continues to monitor the patient and provides clear instructions on recovery and self-care. The nurse advises the patient on what to expect after the test and when to resume regular medications. Patients should also be educated on warning signs of worsening respiratory symptoms and instructed to contact their healthcare provider or seek immediate medical attention if they experience increased shortness of breath, wheezing, chest tightness, or reduced responsiveness to usual asthma medications. This guidance helps ensure continuity of care and promotes patient safety following bronchoprovocation testing.
Nursing, Allied Health, and Interprofessional Team Monitoring
In addition to monitoring the patient's vital signs and oxygenation, the nurse is responsible for thoroughly documenting the methacholine challenge test. Proper documentation includes noting the start time of the procedure, any medications administered, and the conclusion time of the test. The nurse must also provide detailed documentation of the patient's respiratory status throughout the procedure and recovery period, capturing any changes or symptoms observed to ensure accurate clinical records and continuity of care.
References
Simpson AJ, Drake S, Healy L, Wang R, Bennett M, Wardman H, Durrington H, Fowler SJ, Murray CS, Simpson A. Asthma diagnosis: a comparison of established diagnostic guidelines in adults with respiratory symptoms. EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Oct:76():102813. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102813. Epub 2024 Sep 5 [PubMed PMID: 39296585]
Serra HCOA, Rudakoff LCS, Muniz AKOA, Magalhães EIDS, Bragança MLBM, Silva AAMD, Vianna EDSO, Bettiol H, Barbieri MA. Association between the Consumption of Ultra-Processed Foods and Asthma in Adults from Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil. Nutrients. 2023 Jul 17:15(14):. doi: 10.3390/nu15143165. Epub 2023 Jul 17 [PubMed PMID: 37513583]
Lee MK, Yoon HK, Kim SW, Kim TH, Park SJ, Lee YM. Nonspecific Bronchoprovocation Test. Tuberculosis and respiratory diseases. 2017 Oct:80(4):344-350. doi: 10.4046/trd.2017.0051. Epub 2017 Sep 1 [PubMed PMID: 28905530]
Davis BE, Blais CM, Cockcroft DW. Methacholine challenge testing: comparative pharmacology. Journal of asthma and allergy. 2018:11():89-99. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S160607. Epub 2018 May 14 [PubMed PMID: 29785128]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceHallstrand TS, Leuppi JD, Joos G, Hall GL, Carlsen KH, Kaminsky DA, Coates AL, Cockcroft DW, Culver BH, Diamant Z, Gauvreau GM, Horvath I, de Jongh FHC, Laube BL, Sterk PJ, Wanger J, American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) Bronchoprovocation Testing Task Force. ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: pathophysiology and methodology of indirect airway challenge testing. The European respiratory journal. 2018 Nov:52(5):. pii: 1801033. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01033-2018. Epub 2018 Nov 15 [PubMed PMID: 30361249]
Pulmonary Function and Clinical Respiratory Physiology Committee of Chinese Association of Chest Physicians, Chinese Thoracic Society, Pulmonary Function Group of Respiratory Branch of Chinese Geriatric Society. [Standard technical specifications for methacholine chloride (Methacholine) bronchial challenge test (2023)]. Zhonghua jie he he hu xi za zhi = Zhonghua jiehe he huxi zazhi = Chinese journal of tuberculosis and respiratory diseases. 2024 Feb 12:47(2):101-119. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112147-20231019-00247. Epub [PubMed PMID: 38309959]
Anderson SD. Indirect challenge tests: Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: its measurement and clinical significance. Chest. 2010 Aug:138(2 Suppl):25S-30S. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0116. Epub [PubMed PMID: 20668015]
Rubinfeld AR, Pain MC. Perception of asthma. Lancet (London, England). 1976 Apr 24:1(7965):882-4 [PubMed PMID: 58147]
Irwin RS, Curley FJ, French CL. Chronic cough. The spectrum and frequency of causes, key components of the diagnostic evaluation, and outcome of specific therapy. The American review of respiratory disease. 1990 Mar:141(3):640-7 [PubMed PMID: 2178528]
McFadden ER Jr, Zawadski DK. Vocal cord dysfunction masquerading as exercise-induced asthma. a physiologic cause for "choking" during athletic activities. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine. 1996 Mar:153(3):942-7 [PubMed PMID: 8630577]
Lantto J, Suojalehto H, Jantunen H, Lindström I. Long-term clinical follow-up of irritant-induced occupational asthma. Occupational and environmental medicine. 2024 Dec 22:81(11):588-591. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2024-109540. Epub 2024 Dec 22 [PubMed PMID: 39537354]
. Evidence reviews for bronchial challenge test with mannitol: Asthma: diagnosis, monitoring and chronic asthma management (update): Evidence review I. 2024 Nov:(): [PubMed PMID: 39937940]
Paoletti G, Costanzo G, Merigo M, Puggioni F, Ferri S, Messina MR, Cordella F, Ranieri G, Arienzo A, Savevski V, Canonica GW, de Brito Martins A, Heffler E. Vocal biomarkers correlate with FEV1 variations during methacholine challenge. Clinical and translational allergy. 2025 Apr:15(4):e70055. doi: 10.1002/clt2.70055. Epub [PubMed PMID: 40155363]
Haddadzadeh Shoushtari M, Afrakhteh S, Borsi SH, Raji H, Idani E. Pulmonary Function Tests in Thunderstorm-associated Respiratory Symptoms: A Cross-sectional Study. Iranian journal of medical sciences. 2024 Jan:49(1):40-45. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2023.96337.2784. Epub 2024 Jan 1 [PubMed PMID: 38322159]
Level 2 (mid-level) evidenceAbramson MJ, Gwini SM, de Klerk NH, Del Monaco A, Dennekamp M, Fritschi L, Dimitriadis C, Mohebbi M, Musk AWB, Sim MR. Predictive value of non-specific bronchial challenge testing for respiratory symptoms and lung function in aluminium smelter workers. Occupational and environmental medicine. 2020 Aug:77(8):535-539. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2019-106344. Epub 2020 Apr 7 [PubMed PMID: 32265234]
Coates AL, Wanger J, Cockcroft DW, Culver BH, Bronchoprovocation Testing Task Force: Kai-Håkon Carlsen, Diamant Z, Gauvreau G, Hall GL, Hallstrand TS, Horvath I, de Jongh FHC, Joos G, Kaminsky DA, Laube BL, Leuppi JD, Sterk PJ. ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: general considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests. The European respiratory journal. 2017 May:49(5):. pii: 1601526. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01526-2016. Epub 2017 May 1 [PubMed PMID: 28461290]
Wang J, Mochizuki H, Muramatsu R, Arakawa H, Tokuyama K, Morikawa A. Evaluation of bronchial hyperresponsiveness by monitoring of transcutaneous oxygen tension and arterial oxygen saturation during methacholine challenge in asthmatic children. The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma. 2006 Mar:43(2):145-9 [PubMed PMID: 16517431]
Lavoie G, Lemière C. Impact of Ongoing Treatment With Inhaled Corticosteroids During Specific Inhalation Challenges for Diagnosing Occupational Asthma. The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice. 2024 Nov:12(11):2977-2982. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.07.021. Epub 2024 Jul 31 [PubMed PMID: 39094943]
Cockcroft DW, Davis BE. The bronchoprotective effect of inhaling methacholine by using total lung capacity inspirations has a marked influence on the interpretation of the test result. The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology. 2006 Jun:117(6):1244-8 [PubMed PMID: 16750982]
Luedders J, May S, Lyden E, Rorie A, Graaff JV, Zamora-Sifuentes J, Walenz R, Poole JA. Age differences in inducible laryngeal obstruction in adult populations. Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology. 2024 Nov:133(5):574-580. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2024.08.005. Epub 2024 Aug 17 [PubMed PMID: 39154909]
Bohadana AB, Rokach A, Wild P, Izbicki G. Asthma-like symptoms induced by the methacholine challenge test: do they predict a negative-to-positive switch in the test result?-case report. Journal of thoracic disease. 2018 Oct:10(10):E716-E720. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.09.63. Epub [PubMed PMID: 30505509]
Level 3 (low-level) evidenceCockcroft DW, Berscheid BA, Murdock KY. Unimodal distribution of bronchial responsiveness to inhaled histamine in a random human population. Chest. 1983 May:83(5):751-4 [PubMed PMID: 6839815]
Cockcroft DW. Direct challenge tests: Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: its measurement and clinical significance. Chest. 2010 Aug:138(2 Suppl):18S-24S. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-0088. Epub [PubMed PMID: 20668014]