Back To Search Results

Azotemia

Editor: Narothama R. Aeddula Updated: 5/14/2023 7:41:17 PM

Introduction

Azotemia is a biochemical abnormality, defined as an elevation or buildup of nitrogenous products (BUN, usually ranging from 7 to 21 mg/dL), creatinine in the blood, and other secondary waste products within the body. Raising the level of nitrogenous waste is attributed to the inability of the renal system to filter waste products adequately, resulting in a decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR). It is a typical feature of both acute and chronic kidney injury.

Azotemia is crucial when discussing the precipitant syndrome of acute kidney injury (AKI), which has 3 subtypes: prerenal, intrinsic, and post-renal azotemia. There are multiple classification systems used to define AKI, including the RIFLE criteria of 2004, the AKIN criteria of 2007, and the KDIGO system of 2012. AKI is generally diagnosed by an increase in creatinine (Cr) of 0.3 mg/dL, a Cr increase greater than 1.5%, or a decrease in creatinine clearance of less than 0.5 mL/kg per hour. This diagnosis is made with urinalysis (UA), urine electrolytes, metabolic panel (CMP/BMP), and a renal ultrasound (US). With these labs, the clinician can discern the classification and etiology of the AKI, which guides clinical management. Azotemia manifests as a constellation of clinical signs and symptoms, accompanied by biochemical abnormalities, and is termed uremia.

Etiology

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Etiology

For each classification of azotemia, there are unique etiologies. 

  • Prerenal azotemia results from an insult/injury to the kidney. Most commonly, we see this in the form of hypoperfusion, or decreased blood flow, to the kidneys from various etiologies of volume depletion, such as the physiologic state shock, dehydration, hemorrhage, over-diuresis, burns, and even intravascular depletion from low-oncotic pressure states, such as congestive heart failure and liver failure.[1]
  • Intrinsic azotemia results from damage to the kidney's structure; the affected structures include the glomeruli, renal tubules, interstitium, and renal vasculature. This can result from inflammatory conditions, such as vasculitis, toxins, drugs, infections, and damage from hypoperfusion.[2]
  • Post-renal azotemia comes from issues in the ureters and bladder. Usually, a patient has some diagnosis of obstruction, seen in patients with risk factors such as recurrent urinary tract infections, nephrolithiasis, hydronephrosis, and benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Epidemiology

Interestingly, many aspects of the natural history of azotemia remain unclear to this day. With that said, azotemia is quite common, responsible for 8% to 16% of hospital admissions, and is more strongly associated with a significantly higher risk of mortality.[3] There is a need for studies to help understand new knowledge about the incidence of AKI and its epidemiology. Without this, we cannot improve our understanding and stratification of this disease process. The International Society of Nephrology initiative has an ambitious aim to prevent all avoidable deaths from AKI worldwide by 2025.[4] A global study conducted over 10 weeks in 2014 collected data on the burden of KDIGO-based AKI across 289 centers and 72 countries. Seven-day mortality was 10 to 12% in both high- and low-income countries. Key etiologic risk factors varied between countries but included dehydration, shock, infection, sepsis, cardiac disease, and nephrotoxic medications. The study showcased the potential for global data collection to inform international strategy.

Pathophysiology

The kidney receives about 25% of the body's cardiac output. Therefore, they are quite sensitive to any decrease in perfusion and oxygenation. In the setting of severe/prolonged decreased blood flow or hypoxia to these organs, it impairs cellular integrity and metabolism, and ultimately leads to vascular, glomerular, and tubular dysfunction. The damage is reflected by the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which falls in the setting of injury. However, the GFR is not always correlated to the underlying condition, demonstrating the complexity of vascular and tubular processes in renal dysfunction.

Some of the most common findings in AKI include ischemia, apoptosis, tubular necrosis, detachment of renal epithelial cells from the basement membranes, effacement of the brush border in proximal tubules, tubular casts resulting from cell sloughing, interstitial edema, and peritubular capillary congestion.[5]

History and Physical

When evaluating a patient for azotemia/AKI, several key questions and physical findings can help guide the appropriate diagnosis and treatment.

  1. Evaluate volume status
    • Mucous membranes (dry/wet)
    • Skin tenting
    • Edema (pitting/nonpitting)
    • Hepatojugular reflux
    • Pulmonary crackles
    • Ascites
  2. Check for signs of infection (lung, skin, intra-abdominal), fever, chills, diaphoresis, cough, congestion, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dysuria, frequency, pyuria, hematuria

Prerenal findings: Sepsis/shock, burn, bleeding, dehydration (history of diarrhea and vomiting), skin tenting, worsening third spacing from intravascular depletion (pitting edema and ascites), hypotension

Intra-renal findings: Nephrotoxic medication history, contrast exposure, poorly controlled hypertension, or diabetes mellitus

Post-renal findings: Flank pain, concerning for pyelonephritis; colicky pain, concerning for nephrolithiasis; boggy prostate, urinary hesitancy, anuria, concerning for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH); smoking history, concerning for bladder cancer; spinal cord trauma, concerning for neurogenic bladder.

Evaluation

Laboratory evaluation for azotemia includes a basic metabolic panel (BMP), BUN/Cr, urinary sodium (Na), protein, Cr, urea, urine osmolality (Ur Osmo), and urinalysis (UA). Radiographic evaluation can be performed with a renal ultrasound (US), CT of the abdomen and pelvis with or without contrast, or a renal Doppler examination.

Diagnosis of Azotemia can be made by a BUN greater than 21 mg/dL

Significant findings for prerenal azotemia

  • BUN: Cr ratio greater than 20:1
  • Fractional excretion of sodium (FeNa) less than 1, fractional excretion of urea (FeUr) less than 35%
  • Urine osmolality 500 mOsm/kg
  • UA can show hyaline casts [6]

Intra-Renal Azotemia

  • BUN: Cr ratio less than 20:1
  • FeNa greater than 2, FeUr greater than 50%
  • Ur Osmolality is less than 300 mOsm/kg
  • UA: Cellular debris, muddy brown casts, red cell casts, eosinophils, + proteinuria

Post-Renal Azotemia

  • BUN: Cr ratio less than 20:1
  • FeNa greater than 2
  • Ur Osmo is less than 300 mOsm/kg
  • UA: WBC casts
  • Imaging findings: pyelonephritis, nephrolithiasis, bladder mass

Treatment / Management

The goal in managing azotemia is to treat the underlying condition. For prerenal causes, IV fluid hydration and possible vasopressor support are crucial to reestablish adequate perfusion to the kidneys, thereby optimizing and salvaging the integrity of the renal vasculature and tubules. Intrinsic renal diseases are so multifaceted and variable. Cessation of toxic substances, avoidance of further use, and contrast, followed by hydration, can facilitate the recovery of kidney structures. Hypertension and diabetes are 2 of the most common disease processes that can adversely affect renal vascular and tubular epithelium and renal interstitium if poorly managed. Therefore, optimizing blood pressure and hemoglobin A1c is crucial for protecting the kidneys. For porto-renal azotemia, relief of any obstruction followed by hydration is the mainstay of treatment. A urologic evaluation might be necessary, along with catheter placement.

Along with following BUN/Cr for normalization/stabilization, urine output is very important in ensuring adequate renal function. A minimum of 0.5 mL/kg per hour is considered reassured urine output and a sign of stable kidney function.[7][8][9]

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnoses for azotemia include the following:

  • Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding
  • Corticosteroid use
  • Ketoacidosis
  • States of protein catabolism
  • Congestive heart failure (CHF)
  • Hyperalimentation (TPN)

Prognosis

Generally, treating the underlying causes of azotemia yields favorable outcomes. A remarkable feature of the kidneys is their ability to undergo cellular repair, resolving injury and restoring normal perfusion. The GFR stabilizes, allowing cellular repair, migration, and proliferation to begin with the differentiation of renal epithelium.[10] Progression of renal dysfunction includes chronic kidney disease (CKD) and, more so, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), requiring dialysis.

Complications

A complication related to elevated BUN levels is mostly associated with excess nitrogenous waste production from renal failure. The toxic effects of such waste can cause uremia. Uremic complications include platelet dysfunction and bleeding, encephalopathy, peripheral neuropathy, nausea, vomiting, hypothermia, and itching. Uremia is an indication for emergent hemodialysis. Allopurinol and rasburicase are medications that control uric acid levels and are renal-protective.

Consultations

Consultations typically requested for patients with this condition include those with nephrology and urology expertise.

Deterrence and Patient Education

Proper primary care and patient education are crucial to controlling comorbid conditions that can precipitate azotemia/AKI. Diabetes and hypertension are the 2 main conditions that are leading risk factors in damaging the kidneys. Avoidance of infection exposure and proper hydration are also paramount for patients to understand and practice to ensure healthy kidney function.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Treating azotemia is crucial to protect patients from renal failure. Renal failure is a growing complication due to many underlying conditions, including hypertension and diabetes. Adherence to guidelines and evidence-based practice optimizes renal outcomes. Targeting hemoglobin A1c levels of less than 6.5 to 7 with lab work, either twice a year if meeting goals or every 3 months if poorly controlled, is vital from the primary care/outpatient setting. Checking urinary microalbumin helps monitor if nephrotoxic effects of diabetes have progressed to the point of proteinuria. Along with that, blood pressure goals are just as important, not only in keeping the BP range less than 140/90 mmHg, but also in ensuring the appropriate choice of medications to reduce the nephrotoxic side effects of the drugs.

In the inpatient setting, monitoring serum creatinine (Cr) and urine output is crucial for tracking and predicting renal outcomes. Azotemia is quite common, responsible for 8 to 16% of hospital admissions, and is more strongly associated with a significantly higher risk of mortality. An interprofessional team, including nursing staff and physicians, must maintain an open line of communication regarding the patient's blood pressure to prevent hypotension and preserve renal perfusion and urinary output. If a patient's urine output starts to fall below 0.5 mL/kg per hour, there is increased concern for worsening renal function, likely related to the underlying condition that precipitated the azotemia. It is always essential to have nephrology services involved throughout the patient's hospital course to ensure expert treatment recommendations. With this, the patient has established care with the necessary specialty service for outpatient follow-up and care if needed.

References


[1]

Shetty S, Nagaraju SP, Shenoy S, Attur RP, Rangaswamy D, Rao IR, Mateti UV, Parthasarathy R. Acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis of liver: Clinical profile and predictors of outcome. Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology. 2018 May:37(3):248-254. doi: 10.1007/s12664-018-0867-4. Epub 2018 Jul 17     [PubMed PMID: 30014435]


[2]

Moore RH, Anele UA, Krzastek SC, Klausner AP, Roseman JT. Report of Three Cases of AKI Following Weight-Based Gentamicin Prophylaxis for IPP Implantation: Potential Concerns for Patients with Preexisting Conditions. Case reports in urology. 2018:2018():3479202. doi: 10.1155/2018/3479202. Epub 2018 Dec 4     [PubMed PMID: 30631633]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[3]

Sawhney S, Fraser SD. Epidemiology of AKI: Utilizing Large Databases to Determine the Burden of AKI. Advances in chronic kidney disease. 2017 Jul:24(4):194-204. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2017.05.001. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 28778358]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[4]

Mehta RL, Cerdá J, Burdmann EA, Tonelli M, García-García G, Jha V, Susantitaphong P, Rocco M, Vanholder R, Sever MS, Cruz D, Jaber B, Lameire NH, Lombardi R, Lewington A, Feehally J, Finkelstein F, Levin N, Pannu N, Thomas B, Aronoff-Spencer E, Remuzzi G. International Society of Nephrology's 0by25 initiative for acute kidney injury (zero preventable deaths by 2025): a human rights case for nephrology. Lancet (London, England). 2015 Jun 27:385(9987):2616-43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60126-X. Epub 2015 Mar 13     [PubMed PMID: 25777661]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[5]

Basile DP, Anderson MD, Sutton TA. Pathophysiology of acute kidney injury. Comprehensive Physiology. 2012 Apr:2(2):1303-53. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c110041. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 23798302]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[6]

Uchino S, Bellomo R, Goldsmith D. The meaning of the blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio in acute kidney injury. Clinical kidney journal. 2012 Apr:5(2):187-191. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfs013. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29497527]


[7]

Yu MK, Kamal F, Chertow GM. Updates in Management and Timing of Dialysis in Acute Kidney Injury. Journal of hospital medicine. 2019 Apr:14(4):232-238. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3105. Epub 2019 Feb 20     [PubMed PMID: 30794134]


[8]

Nesheiwat Z, Lee JJ. Uremic Pericarditis. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 30725605]


[9]

Amin AA, Alabsawy EI, Jalan R, Davenport A. Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Management of Hepatorenal Syndrome. Seminars in nephrology. 2019 Jan:39(1):17-30. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2018.10.002. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30606404]


[10]

Vaidya VS, Ferguson MA, Bonventre JV. Biomarkers of acute kidney injury. Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology. 2008:48():463-93     [PubMed PMID: 17937594]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence