Back To Search Results

Acute Mountain Sickness

Editor: Martin R. Huecker Updated: 9/15/2025 3:41:17 PM

Introduction

Approximately 200 million individuals travel to high-altitude destinations annually, a number that has increased with improved accessibility and infrastructure to remote regions.[1] High-altitude destinations are defined as elevations above 1,500 m. However, altitude illness is uncommon below 2,500 m.[2] Reduced partial pressure of oxygen at high altitude can produce several pathological conditions.[3] The most common form of high-altitude illness is acute mountain sickness (AMS), which, if unrecognized or untreated, may progress to high-altitude cerebral edema (HACE). Cerebral manifestations differ from pulmonary presentations, such as high-altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE).[4]

Although AMS carries lower morbidity and mortality than HACE or HAPE, its high prevalence makes it a significant concern for individuals recreating at high altitude. Whereas HACE and HAPE are life-threatening emergencies requiring rapid descent, AMS symptoms are often prevented or managed with supportive measures and oral medications. Increasing numbers of travelers expose providers across all practice settings to the need for counseling and guidance on evidence-based strategies for prevention and management of high-altitude illness.

Etiology

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Etiology

High-altitude illness arises from the progressive reduction in partial pressure of inspired oxygen (PIO2) encountered above 1,500 m. The corresponding linear decrease in arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) and resultant reduction in arterial oxygen saturation trigger several physiological adaptations aimed at compensating for hypoxia and promoting acclimatization.

The first response is an increase in minute ventilation, observable within minutes of exposure to reduced PIO2 and PaO2 at high altitude. This hyperventilation lowers arterial carbon dioxide, thereby enhancing PaO2.[5] Hypocapnia produces a concurrent respiratory alkalosis. Over the subsequent 1 to 2 days, renal excretion of bicarbonate mediates partial metabolic correction of this alkalosis. These ventilatory and compensatory mechanisms begin immediately upon altitude exposure and reach near-maximal effect after approximately 4 to 7 days at a consistent elevation. In many travelers, respiration during sleep develops a periodic pattern, which may contribute to the onset of high-altitude symptoms.[6]

The brain is the organ most sensitive to hypoxia and oxygen stress. Cerebral manifestations of high-altitude illness result from hypoxic stress and its effects on the central nervous system (CNS).[7][8] High-altitude headache, AMS, and HACE comprise a spectrum of neurologic high-altitude disorders, all of which demonstrate improvement with supplemental oxygen or descent.

Cerebral blood flow and oxygen delivery are regulated by a balance between hypoxia-induced vasodilation and hypocapnia-induced vasoconstriction. Hypoxia-driven cerebral vasodilation predominates in the initial stages of high-altitude exposure. Acute reductions in PaO2, such as those occurring after rapid ascent to very high altitude, can increase cerebral blood flow by approximately 24% within hours. Over subsequent days, continued hyperventilation and resultant hypocapnia produce cerebral vasoconstriction, returning cerebral blood flow toward baseline. These dynamic changes are clinically significant. Predominance of hypocapnia-induced vasoconstriction may impair cerebral oxygenation, whereas predominance of hypoxic vasodilation may increase the risk of cerebral edema.[9]

The likelihood of experiencing high-altitude illnesses depends primarily on the rate of ascent and the altitude achieved. Acclimatization with acute physiological adaptations reduces the incidence of altitude illness, whereas insufficient acclimatization remains a leading contributor. A distinguishing feature of high-altitude illness, compared with other diagnoses, is onset during the early phase of ascent. Studies demonstrate a positive correlation between rapid ascent and a higher incidence of altitude illnesses. In AMS, most affected individuals develop symptoms within hours to 1 to 2 days of ascent to 2,500 m or higher, although susceptible individuals may occasionally manifest symptoms at altitudes as low as 2,000 m.

Symptoms most often appear during the first night at altitude.[10] Changes in sleeping altitude have been identified as a key factor influencing disease risk. Current guidelines recommend gradual ascent, limiting increases in sleeping elevation to no more than 500 m per day above 3,000 m. Rest days without further elevation gain should be scheduled every 2 to 4 days.[11] Staged ascent strategies, such as a transit night at a lower high-altitude location around 1,500 m before reaching 3,000 m, further reduce AMS incidence. Additional risk reduction may be achieved by spending several days to a week at approximately 3,000 m before continuing ascent. Failure to adhere to these guidelines and allow sufficient time for acclimatization increases not only the incidence of AMS but also the risk of progression to more severe conditions, including HACE.

Epidemiology

The most common high-altitude illness, AMS, affects 25% to 43% of individuals ascending to elevations of 2,500 to 4,300 m. AMS is uncommon below 2,500 m, although cases have been documented in susceptible individuals at altitudes as low as 2,000 m. Incidence is higher among individuals who have not undergone acclimatization and who ascend rapidly, a pattern frequently observed in tourist destinations such as ski resorts offering direct flights or other rapid access to high altitude. Travel to higher elevations correlates with both increased incidence and severity of AMS, although adherence to guidelines for staged, gradual ascent reduces risk. AMS occurs in over 60% of people ascending to altitudes of 6,000 m or greater.

Individuals with a prior history of AMS are at least twice as likely to experience symptoms upon repeat ascents. Additional risk factors include rapid ascent, high sleeping altitude, strenuous physical exertion at altitude, and younger age. Healthy individuals are affected at comparable rates, although those with a history of migraines may exhibit increased susceptibility. Current evidence does not support significant sex differences in AMS incidence.

Chronic conditions that impair oxygen delivery, such as anemia or cardiopulmonary disorders, may increase the risk of high-altitude illnesses if they reduce exercise tolerance or baseline function at lower altitudes. Conversely, literature does not indicate a substantially elevated risk of AMS among people with chronic disease who maintain normal functional capacity. Thorough pretravel planning is essential for such individuals. Recommended strategies include screening to assess disease severity, optimization of existing medical conditions, detailed plans for treatment while traveling, and guidance on itinerary modifications to minimize altitude-related risks.[12][13]

Pathophysiology

As mentioned, hypoxemia drives the physiological changes underlying high-altitude illnesses. Although the effects of hypoxia on cerebral vasculature are well established, the pathophysiology of AMS remains under investigation. Symptoms of AMS are believed to result from mild-to-moderate hypobaric hypoxia, even when arterial oxygen saturation frequently remains above 90%. Inadequate ventilatory responses or impaired oxygen exchange due to pulmonary dysfunction may exacerbate AMS symptoms.

Severe AMS may involve mild cerebral edema, but mild-to-moderate AMS is no longer thought to involve edema. In moderate-to-severe cases, elevated intracranial pressure has been observed and likely contributes to symptomatology. This elevation is related to both intracranial volume expansion at altitude and cerebrospinal fluid volume shifts. Intracranial venous hypertension secondary to hypoxia may further contribute to AMS symptoms.[14] The "tight-fit" hypothesis posits that individuals with smaller ventricles or reduced intracranial compliance exhibit greater intracranial pressure increases, resulting in more pronounced symptoms.[15] This mechanism may explain why older adults, who experience cerebral volume loss, are less affected than younger cohorts.

History and Physical

The diagnosis of AMS is based on patient history and characteristic symptoms. Diagnosis requires exposure to an altitude of 2,000 m or higher, with most cases occurring above 2,500 m. Patients are typically unacclimatized, having ascended to high altitude within the previous few hours to 3 days. Symptoms may also develop in individuals with prior high-altitude exposure who continue rapid ascent. Classic manifestations of AMS include headache accompanied by nausea, vomiting, anorexia, dizziness or lightheadedness, fatigue, and lethargy. Sleep disturbances are common but not specific to AMS. Symptom severity often increases with physical exertion or positional changes, such as bending forward, and onset is frequently observed during the first night at altitude.

Physical examination findings in patients with AMS are typically unremarkable. No definitive clinical signs are required for diagnosis. The presence of cranial nerve deficits, focal neurologic abnormalities, vision changes, or ataxia should prompt consideration of other possible etiologies of CNS pathology. Mental status is generally normal. Confusion suggests other conditions. Patients presenting with ataxia or altered mental status following recent ascent should raise a strong suspicion for progression to HACE.[16] Concurrent pulmonary symptoms warrant evaluation for HAPE.

Vital signs are generally within normal limits in AMS. Although hypobaric hypoxia initiates the underlying pathophysiology, oxygen saturation often remains normal or comparable to levels observed in unaffected individuals.

Evaluation

AMS is a clinical diagnosis based on the presence of headache accompanied by characteristic symptoms following recent ascent to elevations above 2,500 m. Subjective symptoms and clinical history are sufficient for diagnosis. Additional laboratory or radiographic studies are neither required nor beneficial.

The Lake Louise AMS (LLAMS) criteria, updated in 2018, are commonly used to evaluate patients with suspected AMS. The diagnosis is made in individuals with recent high-altitude exposure when headache is present along with at least 1 of the following symptoms:

  • Nausea or vomiting
  • Fatigue or weakness
  • Dizziness or lightheadedness
  • Decreased appetite

Emphasis is placed on symptom severity and impact on functional status, with marked lethargy and difficulty performing activities of daily living observed in moderate-to-severe AMS. Although the original LLAMS criteria highlighted sleep disturbances, updated guidelines assign them reduced diagnostic importance, while acknowledging that sleep disruption remains common at high altitude.[17]

The LLAMS criteria may be used to differentiate mild, moderate, and severe cases of AMS. This scoring system assigns points based on symptom severity, with higher scores reflecting more severe illness. Several related scoring systems also exist, all derived from the LLAMS and incorporating assessments of headache, fatigue, gastrointestinal symptoms, and neurological manifestations. Some systems additionally assign points for sleep disturbances or respiratory symptoms. Examples of these alternative scoring tools include the Lake Louise Questionnaire Score, the Acute Mountain Sickness Cerebral Score, the Hackett Clinical Score, and the Chinese AMS Score.

Treatment / Management

Careful planning and awareness are essential for preventing high-altitude illnesses. For travelers ascending to extreme elevations, the most significant modifiable risk factor is the rate of ascent. Gradual ascent allows physiological processes to adjust to the reduced partial pressure of oxygen at the new altitude. Scheduled acclimatization remains the safest preventive measure and is generally preferred over pharmacologic interventions due to potential side effects.

Sleeping altitude exerts a greater influence on AMS risk than the maximum daytime elevation. Increases in sleeping altitude should not exceed 500 m per day above 3,000 m. A staged ascent to 3,000 m, with several days to a week spent at this altitude before further ascent, reduces risk. Beyond this level, rest days every 3 to 4 days or 1,000 m of gain are recommended. Minimizing strenuous exertion and avoiding alcohol during the initial days of exposure further decreases symptom risk. Ascent should be halted until symptoms resolve if AMS occurs. Persistent or progressive symptoms require descent, which is curative and should be initiated immediately if conservative measures fail.[18]

Acetazolamide is the most commonly used pharmacologic agent for both prophylaxis and treatment of AMS. As a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, acetazolamide increases urinary bicarbonate excretion, resulting in a mild metabolic acidosis. This acidosis stimulates ventilation, improving oxygenation and alleviating AMS symptoms. By mimicking physiological acclimatization processes, acetazolamide is the preferred choice for both prevention and treatment.

Prophylaxis should be considered in any unacclimatized traveler ascending to high altitude and is strongly recommended for individuals with a prior history of high-altitude illness, a first sleeping altitude above 2,800 m, or an ascent rate exceeding 500 m per day in sleeping altitude gains. Optimal prophylaxis begins 1 to 2 days prior to initial ascent. Therapy should continue for 2 days at the target altitude or for 2 to 4 days if elevation gains exceed recommended ascent rates.

Recommended dosing for prophylaxis is 125 mg orally twice daily, with treatment doses of 250 mg orally twice daily if AMS develops.[19][20] Side effects are generally mild and include paresthesia of the hands and face, gastrointestinal discomfort, and altered taste of carbonated beverages.(A1)

Alternatively, dexamethasone may be used for both prophylaxis and treatment of AMS. Unlike acetazolamide, dexamethasone does not facilitate physiological acclimatization or improve oxygenation and is, therefore, less commonly used for prophylaxis. As an anti-inflammatory agent, dexamethasone reduces cerebral inflammation and edema, making it effective for treating both AMS and HACE.[21](A1)

Prophylaxis may begin at the time of ascent or a day prior and should continue for 2 to 4 days after reaching peak altitude. Recommended prophylactic dosing is 2 mg every 6 hours or 4 mg twice daily, while treatment doses for symptomatic AMS are 4 mg every 6 hours, accompanied by cessation of ascent.[22] Side effects are consistent with corticosteroid use and include insomnia, irritability, increased appetite, hyperglycemia, and heightened risk of immunosuppression with prolonged use. Tapering is advised for courses exceeding 7 to 10 days. Dexamethasone prophylaxis is not recommended for children.

Oxygen therapy may relieve AMS symptoms, particularly in moderate-to-severe presentations or in situations when descent is not immediately feasible. Administration via nasal cannula or mask is generally sufficient. Portable hyperbaric chambers may also alleviate symptoms but are more commonly employed for severe high-altitude illnesses such as HACE or HAPE.

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis for AMS is broad. High-altitude or tension-type headache should be considered in patients presenting with headache alone. Individuals with a history of migraine are more susceptible to AMS, but may also present with typical migraine attacks. Response to descent or supplemental oxygen may help distinguish AMS from these more benign conditions.

Viral syndromes or sinusitis should be considered in individuals experiencing headache concurrently with upper respiratory symptoms. The presence of fever necessitates consideration of viral or bacterial meningitis.

Headache is a common adverse effect of various medications. A review of the patient’s medication list can aid in differentiating AMS from drug-induced symptoms.

Abnormal fluid or electrolyte states may mimic AMS. Hyponatremia can produce symptoms resembling AMS or HACE and requires laboratory confirmation, although a history of excessive free water intake may be suggestive. Dehydration or alcohol-induced hangover may also produce headache, nausea, vomiting, and anorexia. These conditions generally improve with fluid and electrolyte replacement, whereas AMS symptoms persist despite supportive measures.

Cerebrovascular accident or intracranial hemorrhage should be considered if focal neurologic deficits are elicited. A history of trauma or anticoagulant use suggests intracranial hemorrhage. In contrast, neurologic deficits in a patient with cardiovascular risk factors may indicate an acute cerebrovascular accident. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis should also be considered in refractory headaches, particularly in individuals who have a history of thromboembolic disease or are currently pregnant or in the postpartum phase.

Ataxia or altered mental status strongly suggests HACE. Immediate descent is warranted when this condition is suspected. Although AMS may occur concurrently with HAPE, headache is not a diagnostic criterion for this respiratory condition. Exposure to carbon monoxide, such as from a camp stove in an enclosed space, should also be considered in individuals presenting with headache under such circumstances.

Prognosis

The prognosis is generally favorable when AMS is promptly recognized and appropriately managed through supportive care, cessation of further ascent, and adjunctive pharmacologic therapy. Most individuals achieve full recovery without persistent symptoms. However, patients with a prior history of AMS have approximately twice the risk of recurrence during subsequent journeys following a similar ascent profile.

Complications

Ignoring AMS symptoms or continuing ascent increases the risk of progression to HACE. This CNS condition is characterized by worsening ataxia and altered mental status and may advance to seizures, coma, and death if untreated. Healthcare providers should counsel individuals participating in high-altitude activities that AMS and HACE represent a continuum of altitude-related illnesses. Emphasizing the importance of early recognition and immediate cessation of ascent upon symptom onset is critical to prevent serious morbidity.

Deterrence and Patient Education

Healthcare professionals play a critical role in preparing travelers for high-altitude destinations by providing education on the risks of high-altitude illnesses, including AMS. Travelers should understand that altitude illnesses exist on a spectrum, and early signs of AMS should not be ignored. Clinicians can support informed decision-making by offering guidance on gradual ascent, recognition of early symptoms, and preventive strategies, such as adequate hydration, scheduled rest, and prophylactic medications when indicated. Such counseling may reduce the risk of illness and minimize the need for evacuation in remote or resource-limited settings.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

As the number of individuals traveling to high-altitude destinations increases annually, interprofessional collaboration among healthcare professionals becomes essential for the prevention and management of altitude illnesses. Preventive efforts should begin prior to travel, with physicians, advanced practice providers, nurses, and wilderness medicine experts providing education through primary care and travel medicine clinics, as well as wilderness and expedition-focused medical societies. Pharmacists may contribute by offering guidance on AMS prophylaxis and treatment.

Healthcare teams during high-altitude travel or expeditions may include nontraditional members, such as local guides, whose extensive backcountry experience may exceed formal medical training. Effective communication and coordination are critical when managing groups, such as expedition teams, because prompt recognition and intervention reduce the risk of injury and illness. Through preventive strategies, interprofessional collaboration, and prioritization of patient safety in remote and resource-limited environments, healthcare teams enhance outcomes for individuals at risk of AMS and strengthen overall team performance.

References


[1]

Forrer A, Gaisl T, Sevik A, Meyer M, Senteler L, Lichtblau M, Bloch KE, Ulrich S, Furian M. Partial Pressure of Arterial Oxygen in Healthy Adults at High Altitudes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA network open. 2023 Jun 1:6(6):e2318036. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18036. Epub 2023 Jun 1     [PubMed PMID: 37326993]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[2]

Luks AM, Beidleman BA, Freer L, Grissom CK, Keyes LE, McIntosh SE, Rodway GW, Schoene RB, Zafren K, Hackett PH. Wilderness Medical Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Acute Altitude Illness: 2024 Update. Wilderness & environmental medicine. 2024 Mar:35(1_suppl):2S-19S. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2023.05.013. Epub 2023 Dec 27     [PubMed PMID: 37833187]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[3]

Lacey JRN, Kidel C, van der Kaaij JM, Brinkman P, Gilbert-Kawai ET, Grocott MPW, Mythen MG, Martin DS, Xtreme Everest 2 Research Group. The Smell of Hypoxia: using an electronic nose at altitude and proof of concept of its role in the prediction and diagnosis of acute mountain sickness. Physiological reports. 2018 Sep:6(17):e13854. doi: 10.14814/phy2.13854. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30187693]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[4]

McGowan J, Huecker MR. High-Altitude Cardiopulmonary Diseases. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 28723040]


[5]

Ainslie PN, Lucas SJ, Burgess KR. Breathing and sleep at high altitude. Respiratory physiology & neurobiology. 2013 Sep 15:188(3):233-56. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2013.05.020. Epub 2013 May 28     [PubMed PMID: 23722066]


[6]

Roche J, Fisher JP, Rasmussen P, Ibrahim A, Ainslie PN, Turner R, Vinetti G, Cesari M, Furian M, Stefani A, Netzer N, Gatterer H, Högl B, Siebenmann C. Effects of nocturnal periodic breathing on sympathetic nerve activity and ventilatory control at high altitude: a randomised, crossover study. The Journal of physiology. 2025 Jul 20:():. doi: 10.1113/JP288700. Epub 2025 Jul 20     [PubMed PMID: 40684423]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[7]

Schneider M, Bärtsch P. Characteristics of Headache and Relationship to Acute Mountain Sickness at 4559 Meters. High altitude medicine & biology. 2018 Dec:19(4):321-328. doi: 10.1089/ham.2018.0025. Epub 2018 Aug 1     [PubMed PMID: 30067102]


[8]

Wang K, Zhang M, Li Y, Pu W, Ma Y, Wang Y, Liu X, Kang L, Wang X, Wang J, Qiao B, Jin L. Physiological, hematological and biochemical factors associated with high-altitude headache in young Chinese males following acute exposure at 3700 m. The journal of headache and pain. 2018 Jul 25:19(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0878-7. Epub 2018 Jul 25     [PubMed PMID: 30046908]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[9]

Nuss R. Medical Conditions and High-Altitude Travel. The New England journal of medicine. 2022 May 12:386(19):1866. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2203182. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 35544404]


[10]

Meier D, Collet TH, Locatelli I, Cornuz J, Kayser B, Simel DL, Sartori C. Does This Patient Have Acute Mountain Sickness?: The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review. JAMA. 2017 Nov 14:318(18):1810-1819. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.16192. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29136449]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[11]

Luks AM, Hackett PH. Medical Conditions and High-Altitude Travel. The New England journal of medicine. 2022 Jan 27:386(4):364-373. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra2104829. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 35081281]


[12]

Sánchez-Mascuñano A, Masuet-Aumatell C, Morchón-Ramos S, Ramon JM. Relationship of altitude mountain sickness and smoking: a Catalan traveller's cohort study. BMJ open. 2017 Sep 24:7(9):e017058. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017058. Epub 2017 Sep 24     [PubMed PMID: 28947454]


[13]

Koirala P, Pandit B, Phuyal P, Zafren K. Yarsagumba Fungus: Health Problems in the Himalayan Gold Rush. Wilderness & environmental medicine. 2017 Sep:28(3):267-270. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 Jul 14     [PubMed PMID: 28716290]


[14]

Lawley JS, Alperin N, Bagci AM, Lee SH, Mullins PG, Oliver SJ, Macdonald JH. Normobaric hypoxia and symptoms of acute mountain sickness: Elevated brain volume and intracranial hypertension. Annals of neurology. 2014 Jun:75(6):890-8. doi: 10.1002/ana.24171. Epub 2014 May 20     [PubMed PMID: 24788400]


[15]

Hackett PH. High altitude cerebral edema and acute mountain sickness. A pathophysiology update. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 1999:474():23-45     [PubMed PMID: 10634991]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[16]

Jensen JD, Vincent AL. High Altitude Cerebral Edema. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 28613666]


[17]

Roach RC, Hackett PH, Oelz O, Bärtsch P, Luks AM, MacInnis MJ, Baillie JK, Lake Louise AMS Score Consensus Committee. The 2018 Lake Louise Acute Mountain Sickness Score. High altitude medicine & biology. 2018 Mar:19(1):4-6. doi: 10.1089/ham.2017.0164. Epub 2018 Mar 13     [PubMed PMID: 29583031]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[18]

Luks AM. Clinician's corner: What do we know about safe ascent rates at high altitude? High altitude medicine & biology. 2012 Sep:13(3):147-52     [PubMed PMID: 22994513]


[19]

Nieto Estrada VH, Molano Franco D, Medina RD, Gonzalez Garay AG, Martí-Carvajal AJ, Arevalo-Rodriguez I. Interventions for preventing high altitude illness: Part 1. Commonly-used classes of drugs. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2017 Jun 27:6(6):CD009761. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009761.pub2. Epub 2017 Jun 27     [PubMed PMID: 28653390]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[20]

Gao D, Wang Y, Zhang R, Zhang Y. Efficacy of Acetazolamide for the Prophylaxis of Acute Mountain Sickness: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. The American journal of the medical sciences. 2021 May:361(5):635-645. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.12.022. Epub 2021 Feb 12     [PubMed PMID: 33587912]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[21]

Wang J, Lian N, Tang K, Deng Y, Li T. Comparative effects of pharmacological interventions for the prevention of acute mountain sickness: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Travel medicine and infectious disease. 2025 Jul-Aug:66():102868. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2025.102868. Epub 2025 May 16     [PubMed PMID: 40383249]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[22]

Kumar R, Chanana N, Sharma K, Palmo T, Lee MH, Mishra A, Nolan K, Fonseca Balladares DC, Mickael C, Gupta MD, Thinlas T, Pasha Q, Graham BB. Dexamethasone prophylaxis protects from acute high-altitude illness by modifying the peripheral blood mononuclear cell inflammatory transcriptome. Bioscience reports. 2023 Nov 30:43(11):. doi: 10.1042/BSR20231561. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 37975243]