Calculators, Algorithms, Drug Interaction CheckersTools
Back To Search Results

Endodontics, Pulp Space Anatomy and Access Cavity of Anterior Teeth

Author: Pradip R. Chauhan Author: Joseph O. Daley Editor: Girish Chauhan Updated: 9/14/2025 11:16:39 PM

Introduction

Anterior teeth—specifically the incisors and canines—play a central role in both dental esthetics and function.[1] Beneath their hard tissues lies a complex pulp cavity, defined by a dentin-covered roof, a floor parallel to that roof, and canalicular extensions (root canals) projecting from the pulp chamber floor.[2] The chamber itself is located within the crown, while the root canals extend apically within the root structure.[3] These canals terminate in foramina, providing a vital conduit for blood vessels and sensory nerves.[4]

For the general dentist and endodontist, a precise understanding of this internal anatomy is indispensable, as the root canal system, integral to the central pulp cavity, is the primary site of intervention during root canal therapy.[5] This system consists of a broader pulp chamber and a narrower pulp canal [6], both of which contain dental pulp, a specialized connective tissue that communicates with the periodontal ligament via the apical foramen.[5][7]

Access cavity preparation is more than a simple entry—it involves careful biomechanical shaping, removal of infected or necrotic pulp tissue, replacement of defective restorations, and elimination of unsupported tooth structure.[8] In anterior teeth, practitioners may choose from several access strategies, including traditional (TradAC), conservative (ConsAC), ultraconservative (UltraAC), and truss (TrussAC) designs.[9] As contemporary endodontics shifts toward minimally invasive approaches, these techniques warrant critical evaluation to balance structural preservation with effective canal debridement.

Anatomy and Physiology

Register For Free And Read The Full Article
Get the answers you need instantly with the StatPearls Clinical Decision Support tool. StatPearls spent the last decade developing the largest and most updated Point-of Care resource ever developed. Earn CME/CE by searching and reading articles.
  • Dropdown arrow Search engine and full access to all medical articles
  • Dropdown arrow 10 free questions in your specialty
  • Dropdown arrow Free CME/CE Activities
  • Dropdown arrow Free daily question in your email
  • Dropdown arrow Save favorite articles to your dashboard
  • Dropdown arrow Emails offering discounts

Learn more about a Subscription to StatPearls Point-of-Care

Anatomy and Physiology

Pulp Space

The pulp space is the cavity within the teeth surrounded by dentin, except at the apex.[10] The pulp space cavity can be divided into the pulp chamber (coronal part) and the root canal (radicular part).[11] The boundaries of the pulp chamber can be defined as the roof (comprised of dentin), pulp horn, floor (comprised of dentin parallel to the roof), and canal orifices (a canal in the floor directing to the root canal).[12]

  • Pulp roof: Dentin comprises the pulp roof by covering the pulp space occlusally or incisally.[13][14]
  • Pulp horn: The pulp horn is a direct continuation of the pulp space under the cusp/crown of the tooth.[14]
  • Pulp floor: This boundary is the anatomical base of the pulp chamber located at the level of the cementoenamel junction (CEJ).[14]
  • Canal orifices: Orifices extending from the pulp floor to the root canal are known as canal orifices.[14]

Root Canal

The root canal is the curved, tapering extension from the pulp space to the tooth's root.[15] The lowermost part of the root canal is conical and bears openings (apical foramen) through which blood vessels and nerves enter the root canal.[16] The dental pulp is a well-vascularized, loose connective tissue that develops from the mesenchymal cells.[17] This tissue provides nutritional support to the odontoblast layer and sensory supply to the dentin through the sensory nerves.[17][18]

Pulp Space Cavity Innervation

The dental branches of the following alveolar nerves innervate the anterior teeth:

  • Upper jaw: The alveolar process of the maxilla forms the upper jaw; the superior alveolar nerve branch of the maxillary nerve supplies the root of the teeth in the upper jaw.[19][20][21]
  • Lower jaw: In the mandible, the inferior alveolar nerve is a branch of the posterior division of the mandibular nerve.[22] The inferior alveolar nerve enters the mandibular canal through the inferior alveolar foramen, supplies the root of the teeth, and exits through the mental foramen as a mental nerve.[19][23][24] Branches of the mandibular nerve include:
    • Nervus spinsous: The nervus spinsous from the stem of the mandibular nerve reenters the cranial cavity and supplies the floor of the middle cranial fossa.[23][24][25]
    • Anterior division: The anterior division of the mandibular nerve divides into deep temporal nerves, masseteric nerves, buccal nerves, and the lateral pterygoid nerve.[23][24][26]
    • Posterior division: The posterior division of the mandibular nerve divides into the inferior alveolar nerve, lingual nerve, and auriculotemporal nerve.[24][26]

Age-Specific Dental Changes

Several physiologic changes occur as individuals age, including:

  • Secondary dentine is deposited throughout life, progressively reducing the size of the pulp chamber.[27] This makes pulpal exposure less likely during cavity preparation but can complicate endodontic treatments.[23][28]
  • Enamel is no longer deposited once fully formed and wears down over time.[25][28][29]
  • The root canal system does not expand, but remains relatively constant while the pulp chamber reduces in size.[25][28][30]
  • The apical foramen does not significantly change in size with age.[28][29][31]
  • In the root pulp, calcified masses accumulate and then migrate into the coronal pulp with age.[25][32]
  • Collagen fibers increase both in number and thickness.[33][34][35]
  • As individuals age, nervous fibers regress, and ultimately, the innervation of the dental pulp decreases.[29][36][37]
  • At the dentin–pulp interface, the Schwann cell network becomes less extensive.[25][28][29]

These alterations may result in a diminished reaction to pathogens and environmental harm, potentially leading to a reduction in caries symptoms in older patients.[28][29]

Classification

Selection of an access cavity should strike a balance between structural preservation and adequate canal debridement. Classification of both the pulp chamber and access cavity design enables endodontists to tailor their approach to individual tooth anatomy, thereby reducing procedural complications while maintaining long-term tooth strength.

Pulp Chamber Classification

The pulp chamber of anterior teeth can be categorized according to its shape, size, and anatomical complexity, each factor carrying significant implications for endodontic access and instrumentation. Careful classification enables clinicians to predict internal structures more accurately and tailor treatment approaches with greater precision. Clinical relevance emerges through improved anticipation of internal morphology. Accurate pulp chamber classification supports conservative access preparation, limits unnecessary dentin removal, and reduces the likelihood of structural weakening or fracture, ultimately contributing to more predictable long-term outcomes in endodontic therapy.

Morphological classification

Morphological classification distinguishes pulp chambers based on their form. Oval-shaped pulp chambers are frequently found in mandibular incisors and canines, characterized by elongated mesiodistal dimensions and typically containing a single root canal. Round or conical pulp chambers appear more often in maxillary central incisors, where the cavity lies centrally and narrows smoothly into a single root canal.

Complexity-based classification

Complexity-based classification focuses on the following internal variations:

  • Simple pulp chambers: Simple pulp chambers contain a single, straight canal without notable accessory branches, making them more straightforward to access and prepare.

  • Complex pulp chambers: Complex pulp chambers may include canal bifurcations, accessory canals, or irregular chamber floors. Although less common in anterior teeth, such complexity requires magnification and advanced imaging to ensure thorough assessment and prevent overlooked anatomy.

Classification of Access Cavities for Anterior Teeth

Access cavity designs in anterior teeth have evolved from conventional methods to minimally invasive techniques.[8][9] The main classifications include:

  • Traditional access cavity (TradAC): TradAC involves the complete removal of the pulp chamber roof to provide direct, unobstructed entry to the root canal.

  • Conservative access cavity (ConsAC): ConsAC retains a portion of the pulp chamber roof and pericervical dentin while allowing adequate access for instrumentation.

  • Ultraconservative access cavity (UltraAC): UltraAC minimizes removal of the pulp chamber roof and surrounding dentin to preserve as much tooth structure as possible.

  • Truss access cavity (TrussAC): This design creates 2 or more small, separate openings into individual canals while leaving truss-like sections of the pulp chamber roof intact.

Guided Access Technique

Utilizes 3-dimensional imaging and computer-designed templates to create a precise, minimally invasive access pathway to the pulp chamber. Guided access cavity preparations can be broadly divided into the following 3 main types, based on how digital planning and clinical execution are integrated into endodontic access:

  • Static guided access: The static guided access cavity technique uses cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data and intraoral scans to design a 3D-printed surgical guide. This guide directs the bur along a predetermined trajectory, allowing minimally invasive and highly precise canal entry. Static guidance is particularly indicated for calcified or obliterated canals, where conventional tactile methods risk perforation.
  • Dynamic guided access: The dynamic guided access cavity approach employs real-time navigation systems rather than fixed guides. Using CBCT data linked to tracking devices, the clinician can follow the bur’s movement on a screen in 3 dimensions, adjusting direction as needed during preparation.
  • Hybrid guided access: The hybrid guided access cavity combines elements of static and dynamic systems. In this method, a prefabricated guide may be used initially to gain predictable entry into the tooth, followed by dynamic navigation to complete the preparation with flexibility.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Access cavity designs in anterior teeth have evolved from conventional methods to minimally invasive techniques. The main classifications include:

  • Traditional access cavity 

    • This method involves the complete removal of the pulp chamber roof and direct entry to the root canal.

    • Advantages: Provides unobstructed access and visibility for instrumentation.

    • Disadvantages: Greater loss of tooth structure, increased risk of weakening the tooth, and increased risk of fracture.[4]

  • Conservative access cavity 

    • Focuses on preserving the pericervical dentin and part of the pulp chamber roof, while allowing adequate canal access.

    • Advantages: Enhances tooth strength compared to TradAC.

    • Disadvantages: Slightly limited visual access may be required for effective cleaning, which may necessitate the use of magnification.[5]

  • Ultraconservative access cavity 

    • Minimal removal of pulp chamber roof, retaining maximal tooth structure.

    • Advantages: Maximizes fracture resistance.

    • Disadvantages: Higher technical demand, increased risk of missing canal anatomy, and often relies on guided or magnified access.[5]

  • Truss access cavity 

    • Leaves segments of pulp chamber roof intact in a truss-like pattern, creating separate small access points to individual canals.

    • Advantages: Preserves structural integrity while still allowing canal negotiation.

    • Disadvantages: Limited visibility, requires advanced imaging and precision instrumentation.[6]

  • Guided access techniques

    • Utilizes 3D imaging and computer-guided templates to create highly precise, minimally invasive access cavities.

    • Advantages: High accuracy, conserves tooth structure, reduces iatrogenic errors.

    • Disadvantages: Requires specialized equipment, is costly, and requires a significant amount of planning time.[7]

Indications

The TradAC is indicated in cases where extensive pulp necrosis or infection necessitates complete debridement of the pulp space. This method is also appropriate for teeth with severe pulp chamber calcification, where full visualization is crucial, and for retreatment cases that require a thorough examination of the canal system. 

The ConsAC is best suited for vital or minimally compromised anterior teeth, where preserving pericervical dentin is a priority. ConsAC is typically chosen for teeth with straightforward canal anatomy and minimal calcification, particularly when long-term fracture resistance is a central treatment goal.

The UltraAC is indicated for anterior teeth with intact crowns and minimal structural loss, particularly when preoperative imaging confirms a single straight canal. These cases often benefit from the use of high magnification or guided access methods to maintain precision while preserving as much tooth structure as possible.

The TrussAC is recommended when maintaining structural integrity is paramount, yet entry into multiple canals is required. This approach is most applicable in situations where canal orientations allow separate, small entry points and where restorative longevity and functional durability are key considerations.

The guided access technique is especially valuable for teeth with calcified pulp chambers or canals that are challenging to locate. This technique is also useful for retreatment cases where precision is needed to avoid unnecessary dentin removal and in anatomically complex situations that benefit from a preplanned, template-guided pathway. The guided access method is ideal when a minimally invasive approach is required despite challenging internal anatomy.

Instruments and Materials

The following instruments are used for the anterior access cavity:

  • General instruments: Endodotic explorer, endodotic excavator, endodotic locking pliers, endodotic ruler, endodotic syringe, instrument organizer, transfer sponge, and instrument stopper.[38][39]
  • Intracanal instruments: Barbed broach, k-reamers, k-files (k-flex files and headstorm files), spreader, and plugger.[38][40]
  • Burs used for the anterior access cavity
    • Access opening burs: round burs with 16mm bur shank.[38][41]
    • Access refining burs: Coarse flame-shaped burs, tapered round, diamonds to refine the wall.[38][42]

Technique

Access Cavity Basic Principles

The American Association of Endodontists defines access cavity preparation as the opening created in a tooth to provide entrance to the root canal system for cleaning, shaping, and obturating.[43][44][45] This process requires adherence to fundamental principles that guide effective and safe endodontic treatment.

A preoperative radiograph offers critical details regarding the shape, size, number, and curvature of root canals.[46] Aligning the bur with the radiograph enables the estimation of the required depth of preparation, thereby reducing the risk of overextension or procedural errors.[47][46] Thorough excavation of carious tissue and debris must follow, as residual material can promote reinfection within the canal.[47][48][49]

Attention must also focus on replacing defective restorations. Faulty fillings compromise the coronal seal, limiting the effectiveness of endodontic therapy; replacement ensures proper closure of the access cavity.[47][50] Finally, unsupported tooth tissue should be removed, as such remnants may compromise the seal and produce inaccuracies in determining the true length of the tooth.[47][51] Careful adherence to these principles promotes predictable canal access, effective debridement, and long-term treatment success.

Traditional Methods for Anterior Access Cavity Creation

The pulp cavity of anterior teeth is accessed through the exact center of the lingual surface with the traditional method for creating anterior access cavities.[52] Initial entry is performed with a round bur or a round-point tapering fissure bur held at a right angle to the tooth's long axis.[53] A contra-angle handpiece operating at an accelerated speed with water coolant guides this initial penetration.[38][54] The preparation then extends conveniently toward the incisal, maintaining the bur's point in the central cavity and aligning the handpiece with the tooth's long axis.[55] High-speed instruments should not be used inside the pulp chamber, as they lack the tactile sensitivity required for controlled preparation.[38][56][57]

A fissure bur shapes the cavity outline incisally in a funnel or fan configuration.[54][57][58] Penetration into the pulp chamber proceeds with a surgical-length No. 2 or No. 4 round bur mounted on a slow-speed contra-angle handpiece. In cases of extensive pulpal recession, a No. 2 bur provides better control. Extension toward the incisal allows the bur shaft to operate nearly parallel to the long axis of the tooth.[38][59][57] Following penetration, the remaining tooth structure is removed with a round bur, including dentin beneath the lip of the chamber roof.[38][59][57]

Once the canal orifice is located, the lingual shoulder is eliminated. This dentin shelf extends from the cingulum to approximately 2 mm apical to the orifice. A tapered safety-tip carbide or diamond bur removes this barrier.[38][57] Proper technique requires placing the fine safety-tip diamond bur about 2 mm apical to the canal orifice and inclining it toward the lingual to slope the shoulder, while avoiding beveling of the incisal edge. Removal of the lingual shoulder produces a continuous, fluid preparation.[38][54][56][59]

To prevent complications, infected material and debris from the pulpal horn must be eliminated laterally and incisally with a No. 1 or No. 2 round bur.[38][56][59] The internal configuration of the pulp chamber guides the final outline. In "young" teeth with large pulp chambers, cavity designs remain broad to allow thorough cleaning and accommodate larger instruments and filling materials. Extension toward the incisal improves access to the canal midline.[38][58][54][57][54]

In contrast, "adult" teeth exhibit ovoid pulp chambers partially filled with secondary dentin. To enable the bur shaft and instruments to function in the central axis, convenience extension must be advanced further initially when the radiograph shows advanced pulpal recession. The preparation funnels down toward the canal orifice, which becomes increasingly difficult to reach with a round bur as the pulp recedes, often necessitating a deeper initial extension.[56][59][57] Such an extension ensures that the bur shaft and instruments remain aligned with the central axis, even in cases with a reduced pulp space.[56][59][57]

With the lingual shoulder cleared and incisal access established, instruments can approach the apical third of the canal without restriction. The prepared cavity reflects the shape of the canal system, supporting round, tapered filling materials placed into the apical third. Circumferential filling instruments or Gates-Glidden drills are then employed to clean and shape the remaining ovoid portion of the canal, ensuring adequate debridement and proper preparation for obturation.[38][56][57]

Traditional technique complications 

Traditional methods for anterior access cavity preparation carry a range of potential complications when executed without sufficient precision. An incomplete convenience extension may produce a pear-shaped apical canal, limiting effective shaping and cleaning.[60][61][62] Retention of the lingual shoulder and cavity margin can cause the instrument shaft to rest against these structures, preventing thorough obturation and debridement and ultimately predisposing the case to failure.[40][61][62]

Craniocervical perforation may develop when the convenience extension is left unfinished before the bur shaft enters the canal space.[63][61][62] Pulp debris left behind during preparation may also discolor the crown, especially when the access cavity lacks proper incisal extension and lies too close to the gingival margin.[63][62][40] Misjudgment of the tooth's lingual-axial or mesial-axial inclination can result in abrasion of the labial or distal wall during instrumentation.[63][61][62] Failure to complete the convenience extension can create a ledge at the apical-labial curve, where the instrument shaft rests on the shoulder or cavity edge instead of advancing smoothly into the canal.[63][61][64]

To address these limitations, the concept of minimal access cavity preparation has emerged, emphasizing preservation of dentin structure, reduced patient harm, and support of natural immune healing. Recent advances in biotechnology, nanotechnology, high-resolution imaging, and laser systems have further facilitated minimally invasive approaches, particularly in managing access cavities of anterior teeth.[65]

Conservative Access Cavity

In this method, a restricted amount of dentine can be removed from the chamber roof, allowing for the location of root canals without always requiring straight-line access. The access is extended so that the canals can be identified without completely exposing the pulp. The walls of an access cavity may be divergent or convergent. Only a partial part of the pulp chamber is removed. Regarding paracervical dentine removal, specifically, this design reduces the amount of dentine removed.[52][66][67]

Ultraconservative Access Cavity 

The goal of UltraAC is to maintain the maximum amount of tooth structure. The sole goal is to preserve the pericervical dentine, and visibility or straight-line access is frequently jeopardized. A type of UltraAC preparation, known as "ninja access cavities," is created via a "point access" in the central fossa.[43][68]

Truss Access Cavity 

The TrussAC method is generally applied in multiple-rooted teeth to maintain the dentinal bridge between 2 or more small cavities that have been prepared to access the canal orifices in each root.[7][43][69]

Additional Access Cavity Methods

Other methods of cavity access include the caries-driven access cavity (CariesAC) and the restorative-driven access cavity (RestoAC). CariesAC involves removing only the carious tissue to gain access to the pulp chamber, while preserving all sound tooth structures. This approach limits unnecessary removal of dentin or enamel, prioritizing the conservation of natural anatomy during access.[70][71][72]

RestoAC applies to restored teeth without active caries. In this method, entry to the pulp chamber is created by eliminating existing restorations either completely or partially, depending on the extent of structural compromise. The technique emphasizes preservation of any remaining intact tooth structure while still achieving adequate canal access.[71][72]

Guided Access Cavity

Guided access cavity techniques integrate advanced imaging, 3-dimensional printing, and computer-aided design/manufacture (CAD/CAM) to enhance precision in endodontic procedures. Currently, these methods are more utilized as they enable clinicians to create a controlled drill path to the pulp chamber or apical portion of the root while minimizing the removal of healthy tooth structure.

Guided endodontics relies on CBCT combined with a surface scan of the tooth to plan access. Static navigation uses this data to produce a 3D-printed template with an integrated sleeve, directing the bur along a predetermined trajectory.[68][73][74] Dynamic navigation, by contrast, employs a marker–camera–computer system that tracks the instrument in real time, allowing continuous visualization of its position throughout the procedure.[75][72] Both approaches improve accuracy, reduce the risk of iatrogenic errors, and facilitate minimally invasive access, particularly in calcified or anatomically complex anterior teeth. Studies examining static protocols have demonstrated the clinical feasibility of template-guided access, while dynamic systems have expanded the flexibility and adaptability of guided endodontic techniques in contemporary practice.[68][73][74]

Static Guided Access Cavity

In the method, a fixed surgical stent is manufactured via CAD/CAM based on the preoperative CBCT scan. With specialized software, superimposing 3D surface scans of the teeth and CBCT data is possible in endodontics. The software assists in creating the virtual image of a drilling bur with precise dimensions by creating a virtual model of the tooth that needs to be treated. Clinicians can manually angle the virtual bur that is superimposed on the targeted tooth to create straight-line access to a predefined portion of the root canal. Following the planning of the endodontic bur's orientation, a virtual template is created in the software and exported in the standard tessellation language format to the 3D printer. After that, access preparation can be done using the drilling guide's physical model.[76][77][78]

Advantages of the static guided technique include:

  • Decreased risk of iatrogenic injury and dental complications following a localized partial or total pulp canal obliteration procedure [79][80][81]
  • Decreased operative time [79][81][82]
  • Reduced chances of perforations or canal transportation [80][81][82]
  • Locating calcified root canals more quickly and reliably while losing less material than with traditional endodontic access [79][81][82]
  • Complex procedures can be carried out with less operator experience than traditional access preparations [79][80][82]

Disadvantages of static guided techniques include:

  • Alignment may be compromised by CBCT artifacts from extremely radiopaque restorations in teeth that require full-coverage restorations.[80][83][84]
  • The initial iteration of the static guided system necessitates more radiographic fiducial markers and thermoplastic stent CBCT scans, thereby increasing the radiation exposure. Radiation exposure can be reduced by using preexisting small-field-of-view CBCT scans with the trace registration system.[80][83][85]
  • Superimposing the optical impression may be more difficult when using a small field-of-view CBCT scan.[80][86][85]
  • The friction heat from the spiral bur during drilling may raise the temperature over the tooth because the static guided system does not permit water cooling.[84][86][85]
  • Because a printed guide has an inherent thickness and can only show 1 straight path to the target, placing the handpiece accurately may be challenging. In case the guide, bur, and handpiece cannot fit within the interocclusal space, there may be restricted use of templates in the posterior area.[83][84][86]
  • The complex anatomy of the canal, with its curvature, radicular grooves, and oval roots, may limit the use of this technique.[80][84][86]
  • Dynamic changes (eg, changes in the bur's angulation, size, depth, or type) are not possible during treatment once the template has been created.[80][84][86]
  • Planning and manufacturing the template are costly and time-consuming.[80][84][85]
  • Microcracks may result due to increased forces in the bur.[83][86][85]
  • The loss of hard tissue is similar to a postspace preparation in that it can weaken the root's stability and increase the likelihood of the tooth breaking.[80][83][86]

Dynamic Guided Access Cavity

A dynamic navigation system, also known as the dynamic-guided technique, is based on computer-aided surgical navigation technology. DNS with passive optical technology has been recently used in endodontics, utilizing the global positioning system. Computer-guided special burs are used in real-time, based on information transmitted from a CBCT image. Motion tracking enables the system to function by monitoring the positions of both the patient and the dental handpiece during the process. Using the CBCT data set uploaded into the planning software, the surgeon virtually plans the optimal drill position. The 3D spatial information is transferred to a stereo tracker by sensors that are affixed to the surgical handpiece, the patient's head, or their teeth.[87][88][89]

Advantages of the dynamic navigation system include:

  • With reduced chairside time and radiation exposure, intraoral scans and CBCT acquisitions, planning, and treatment can be completed on the same day.[88][90][91]
  • Since no barrier separates the water source from the bur, water cooling is enhanced, and the possibility of overheating-induced damage to tooth structure is decreased.
  • This system is useful in cases with limited vertical space.[88][90][91][87]
  • The dynamic navigation system has the fewest changes of guidance failures as a result of ill-fitting guides. Any bur can be used because no specific coupling system is required.[88][90][91][87][92][93]
  • Planning is simple because no guide design is required.[91][87][94]
  • Compared to the static guidance technique, multiple bur paths in multicanal teeth can be easily planned and executed.[94][92][93]
  • The dynamic navigation system reduces the risk of iatrogenic damage, eg, root perforation, and is more accurate and safe during surgery than freehand treatment.[88][92][93]
  • Vertical space is increased, and an improved view of the operating field is obtained because no guide is placed on top of the teeth.[88][90][93]
  • Dynamic changes are possible because of live feedback during the procedure.[88][90][92]

 Disadvantages of the dynamic navigation system include:

  • Setting up takes time because the external monitors need to be positioned in a direct line of sight, which requires careful consideration.[87][95][92]
  • When the attached drill tag is outside of the optical tracking field, the guidance system has trouble identifying the drill.[87][95][96]
  • Patient movement during radiopaque coronal restorations and CBCT acquisition can compromise the image quality, hinder virtual planning, and compromise procedural accuracy.[87][91][96]
  • Compared to the current deviation values to static guides, the dynamic navigation system appears slightly high. Having a large handpiece tracker attachment makes it uncomfortable to use regularly.[92][91][96]

Access Canal Technique Selection Considerations

The pulp chamber of anterior teeth represents a complex and essential structure in operative procedures, eg, root canal therapy. The chamber roof, covered by dentin, runs parallel to the chamber floor, which extends into the root canal system. These canals contain sensory nerves and blood vessels that provide vital nutrition to the teeth. Compared with molars and premolars, anterior teeth exhibit smaller pulp chambers, requiring careful planning and precision during endodontic access.

Advances in imaging and computer-assisted design technologies have enabled the development of minimally invasive access techniques, replacing many traditional methods. Guided access to the pulp chamber represents a key minimally invasive approach and can be divided into static and dynamic methods. Both offer distinct advantages, although dynamic navigation shows particular promise due to its reduced impact on surrounding dental tissues. The high initial costs associated with guided access have limited its widespread adoption, making ConsAC and UltraAC techniques the preferred choice in most clinical settings.

Clinical Significance

Access cavity design represents a critical determinant of endodontic success, directly affecting the clinician’s ability to locate, clean, and shape the root canal system while preserving tooth structure. TradAC provides unobstructed entry to the pulp chamber and root canal, making them suitable for complex or retreatment cases. However, extensive removal of tooth structure can compromise long-term strength and increase the risk of fracture.

ConsAC strives to balance adequate canal accessibility with preservation of pericervical dentin and the pulp chamber roof. This approach reduces fracture risk while allowing sufficient instrumentation. UltraAC emphasizes the maximal retention of coronal and pericervical dentin, which is particularly important in young patients or those with structurally intact teeth. Achieving complete canal debridement with this method requires careful planning, precise technique, and often enhanced visualization.

TrussAC preserves structural integrity by leaving truss-like segments of the pulp chamber roof intact, creating separate entries to individual canals. This design supports both fracture resistance and long-term restorative success. Guided access techniques—static, dynamic, or hybrid—further improve precision in locating calcified or anatomically complex canals, reduce iatrogenic errors, and minimize unnecessary dentin removal. These methods prove especially valuable in retreatment cases, teeth with pulp chamber obliteration, or when minimally invasive access is preferred.

Selecting an access cavity strategy that accounts for tooth anatomy, pulp condition, and clinical complexity enables clinicians to optimize long-term outcomes, maintain structural integrity, and minimize procedural complications.

Enhancing Healthcare Team Outcomes

Optimal endodontic care for anterior teeth requires a precise understanding of pulp chamber anatomy, careful selection of access cavity design, and minimally invasive techniques to preserve tooth structure while ensuring thorough canal debridement. Traditional, conservative, ultraconservative, truss, and guided access approaches each offer advantages depending on tooth morphology, pulp status, and procedural complexity. Advances in imaging, guided navigation, and restorative technologies have enhanced the precision and safety of anterior endodontic procedures, reducing iatrogenic errors and improving long-term outcomes.

Effective treatment depends on coordinated interprofessional collaboration among dentists, endodontists, physicians, advanced practitioners, nurses, pharmacists, and other health professionals. Dentists and endodontists provide technical expertise and procedural planning, while radiologists assist with imaging interpretation and pharmacists guide medication management. Nurses and dental assistants support patient preparation, monitoring, and follow-up care. Clear communication, ethical practice, and well-defined responsibilities ensure patient safety, informed decision-making, and accountability. Integrating these skills and strategies enhances patient-centered care, optimizes functional and esthetic outcomes, and strengthens team performance, ultimately improving tooth survival, patient satisfaction, and overall procedural success.

References

[1]

Zimmerman B, Shumway KR, Jenzer AC. Physiology, Tooth. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 30860710]

[2]

Krasner P, Rankow HJ. Anatomy of the pulp-chamber floor. Journal of endodontics. 2004 Jan:30(1):5-16     [PubMed PMID: 14760900]

[3]

Chen S, Hong X, Ye Z, Wu M, Chen L, Wu L, Wang Y, Chen Y, Wu J, Wang J, Zhang Q, Wu Y, Sun X, Ding X, Huang S, Zhao S. The effect of root canal treatment and post-crown restorations on stress distribution in teeth with periapical periodontitis: a finite element analysis. BMC oral health. 2023 Dec 6:23(1):973. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03612-9. Epub 2023 Dec 6     [PubMed PMID: 38057755]

[4]

Mathison M, Pepper T. Local Anesthesia Techniques in Dentistry and Oral Surgery. StatPearls. 2024 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 35593805]

[5]

Dhillon IK, Hong CH, Hu S, Sim YF, Goh BKC, Duggal MS, Sriram G. Accuracy of the American Association of Endodontists diagnostic criteria for assessing pulp health in primary teeth. Clinical oral investigations. 2023 Oct:27(10):6043-6053. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05217-6. Epub 2023 Aug 25     [PubMed PMID: 37624522]

[6]

Simon SR, Tomson PL, Berdal A. Regenerative endodontics: regeneration or repair? Journal of endodontics. 2014 Apr:40(4 Suppl):S70-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.01.024. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 24698698]

[7]

Ahmed HMA, Wolf TG, Rossi-Fedele G, Dummer PMH. The Study and Relevance of Pulp Chamber Anatomy in Endodontics - A Comprehensive Review. European endodontic journal. 2024 Jan 1:9(1):18-34. doi: 10.14744/eej.2023.76598. Epub 2023 Nov 22     [PubMed PMID: 37990569]

[8]

Krapež J, Fidler A. Location and dimensions of access cavity in permanent incisors, canines, and premolars. Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. 2013 Sep:16(5):404-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.117491. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 24082567]

[9]

Silva EJNL, Pinto KP, Ferreira CM, Belladonna FG, De-Deus G, Dummer PMH, Versiani MA. Current status on minimal access cavity preparations: a critical analysis and a proposal for a universal nomenclature. International endodontic journal. 2020 Dec:53(12):1618-1635. doi: 10.1111/iej.13391. Epub 2020 Sep 18     [PubMed PMID: 32854167]

[10]

Wolf TG, Rempapi T, Wierichs RJ, Waber AL. Morphology and root canal configuration of maxillary canines: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC oral health. 2024 Aug 15:24(1):944. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04682-z. Epub 2024 Aug 15     [PubMed PMID: 39143543]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[11]

Manik K, Ikhar A, Patel A, Chandak M, Bhopatkar J, Rathod P, Bhojwani PR. Anatomical Variations in Mandibular Molars: Focus on Midmesial Canals. Cureus. 2024 Jun:16(6):e61711. doi: 10.7759/cureus.61711. Epub 2024 Jun 5     [PubMed PMID: 38975529]

[12]

Benz L, Heck K, Hevisov D, Kugelmann D, Tseng PC, Sreij Z, Litzenburger F, Waschke J, Schwendicke F, Kienle A, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH, Walter E. Visualization of Pulpal Structures by SWIR in Endodontic Access Preparation. Journal of dental research. 2024 Dec:103(13):1375-1383. doi: 10.1177/00220345241262949. Epub 2024 Aug 5     [PubMed PMID: 39101558]

[13]

Rodríguez-Lozano FJ, Insausti CL, Iniesta F, Blanquer M, Ramírez MD, Meseguer L, Meseguer-Henarejos AB, Marín N, Martínez S, Moraleda JM. Mesenchymal dental stem cells in regenerative dentistry. Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal. 2012 Nov 1:17(6):e1062-7     [PubMed PMID: 22926467]

[14]

Ahmed HMA, Keleş A, Wolf TG, Rossi-Fedele G, Dummer PMH. A Proposal to Develop a New Classification for Pulp Chamber Anatomy. European endodontic journal. 2024 Jan 1:9(1):1-7. doi: 10.14744/eej.2023.82713. Epub 2023 Nov 22     [PubMed PMID: 37990574]

[15]

Patnana AK, Chugh A. Endodontic Management of Curved Canals with ProTaper Next: A Case Series. Contemporary clinical dentistry. 2018 Jun:9(Suppl 1):S168-S172. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_54_18. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 29962786]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[16]

Mamat R, Nik Abdul Ghani NR. The Complexity of the Root Canal Anatomy and Its Influence on Root Canal Debridement in the Apical Region: A Review. Cureus. 2023 Nov:15(11):e49024. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49024. Epub 2023 Nov 18     [PubMed PMID: 38111413]

[17]

Ghannam MG, Alameddine H, Bordoni B. Anatomy, Head and Neck, Pulp (Tooth). StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 30725797]

[18]

Nie SC, Yang K, Luan NN, Lian XL, Dai XH, Liang SX, Yan YB. Unveiling the Differences in Biological Properties of Dental Pulp Stem Cells from Normal and Inflamed Pulp: A Comprehensive Comparative Study. Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research. 2022 Mar 18:28():e934511. doi: 10.12659/MSM.934511. Epub 2022 Mar 18     [PubMed PMID: 35301274]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[19]

Diogenes A. Trigeminal Sensory Neurons and Pulp Regeneration. Journal of endodontics. 2020 Sep:46(9S):S71-S80. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.06.038. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 32950198]

[20]

Coulter J, Hohman MH, Kwon E. Otalgia. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 31751020]

[21]

Yao PY, Sequeira Campos MB. Infraorbital Nerve Block. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 29763056]

[22]

Tsakiris E, Kitagawa N, Fukino K, Shekhawat D, Iwanaga J, Tubbs RS. A rare case of the auriculotemporal and inferior alveolar nerves communication. Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA. 2024 Feb:46(2):191-194. doi: 10.1007/s00276-023-03283-9. Epub 2023 Dec 27     [PubMed PMID: 38151551]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[23]

Inoue E, Iwanaga J, Han A, Tabira Y, Haikata Y, Kikuchi K, Saga T, Watanabe K. New anatomical findings in the mandibular body region: Two parts that make up bucco-mandibular space. Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.). 2025 Jul:38(5):523-531. doi: 10.1002/ca.24204. Epub 2024 Jul 29     [PubMed PMID: 39073165]

[24]

Ronan EA, Nagel M, Emrick JJ. The anatomy, neurophysiology, and cellular mechanisms of intradental sensation. Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland). 2024:5():1376564. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1376564. Epub 2024 Mar 25     [PubMed PMID: 38590718]

[25]

Chang SY, Chen RS, Chang JYF, Chen MH. The temporospatial relationship between mouse dental pulp stem cells and tooth innervation. Journal of dental sciences. 2024 Apr:19(2):1075-1082. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.02.007. Epub 2024 Feb 12     [PubMed PMID: 38618089]

[26]

Siddik AB, Sapra A. Anatomy, Head and Neck: Buccal Nerve. StatPearls. 2025 Jan:():     [PubMed PMID: 32809567]

[27]

Lamster IB,Asadourian L,Del Carmen T,Friedman PK, The aging mouth: differentiating normal aging from disease. Periodontology 2000. 2016 Oct;     [PubMed PMID: 27501493]

[28]

Maeda H. Aging and Senescence of Dental Pulp and Hard Tissues of the Tooth. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology. 2020:8():605996. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.605996. Epub 2020 Nov 30     [PubMed PMID: 33330507]

[29]

Morse DR, Esposito JV, Schoor RS. A radiographic study of aging changes of the dental pulp and dentin in normal teeth. Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985). 1993 May:24(5):329-33     [PubMed PMID: 8362047]

[30]

Al-Rokhami RK, Gu H, Dang X, Li Z, Elayah SA, Zhao X, Sakran KA. 3D analysis of morphological changes, maxillary central incisor-incisive canal relationship, and root resorption in subjects with maxillary incisors protrusion who underwent non-extraction fixed appliance therapy considering demographic and skeletal factors: A retrospective study. International orthodontics. 2025 Sep:23(3):100993. doi: 10.1016/j.ortho.2025.100993. Epub 2025 Mar 18     [PubMed PMID: 40106940]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[31]

Dos Santos IF, da Silveira LRC, Santos RA, Amaral TMP, Ferreira DAB, de Souza Gruppioni Côrtes MI, Colosimo EA, Bastos JV. Radiographic characteristics and chronological patterns of transient apical breakdown (TAB) in luxated permanent teeth: A retrospective observational study. Clinical oral investigations. 2024 Nov 27:28(12):660. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06058-7. Epub 2024 Nov 27     [PubMed PMID: 39604634]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[32]

Schulz-Kornas E, Skiba MH, Kaiser TM. Prey size reflected in tooth wear: a comparison of two wolf populations from Sweden and Alaska. Interface focus. 2024 Jun:14(3):20230070. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2023.0070. Epub 2024 Jun 7     [PubMed PMID: 39081625]

[33]

Baker A, Karpagaselvi K, Kumaraswamy J, Ranjini MR, Gowher J. Role of dental pulp in age estimation: A quantitative and morphometric study. Journal of forensic dental sciences. 2019 May-Aug:11(2):95-102. doi: 10.4103/jfo.jfds_57_19. Epub 2020 Jan 24     [PubMed PMID: 32082045]

[34]

Garg R, Gupta S, Mehra S, Parekh U. Contribution of Anatomy in Forensic Age Evaluation: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2024 Feb:16(2):e55080. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55080. Epub 2024 Feb 27     [PubMed PMID: 38550461]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[35]

Rathore A, Puri N, Singh B, Kaur K, Singh B, Singh S. Mandibular Teeth as Predictors in Forensic Age Estimation: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Based Pulp Volume Regression Study. Contemporary clinical dentistry. 2023 Jan-Mar:14(1):11-17. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_508_21. Epub 2022 Nov 3     [PubMed PMID: 37249999]

[36]

Couve E, Schmachtenberg O. Schwann Cell Responses and Plasticity in Different Dental Pulp Scenarios. Frontiers in cellular neuroscience. 2018:12():299. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00299. Epub 2018 Sep 5     [PubMed PMID: 30233330]

[37]

Mahdee A, Eastham J, Whitworth JM, Gillespie JI. Evidence for changing nerve growth factor signalling mechanisms during development, maturation and ageing in the rat molar pulp. International endodontic journal. 2019 Feb:52(2):211-222. doi: 10.1111/iej.12997. Epub 2018 Sep 19     [PubMed PMID: 30099752]

[38]

Winnier J, Suresh R. A Comparative Evaluation of a Labial Approach with a Conventional Palatal Approach for Endodontic Access in Primary Maxillary Incisors: A Pilot Study. International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry. 2020 Jan-Feb:13(1):53-56. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1704. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 32581480]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[39]

Mandil OA, Ghoulah KT, Hazzam BM, Alhijji HS, Al Abbas AH, Rehan AK, Doumani M, Mandil AA. Modern versus Traditional Endodontic Access Cavity Designs. Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences. 2022 Jul:14(Suppl 1):S24-S27. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_668_21. Epub 2022 Jul 13     [PubMed PMID: 36110825]

[40]

Alhilou AM. Factors Reducing Postoperative Pain Related to Root Canal Treatment: A Narrative Review of Systematic Reviews. Dentistry journal. 2025 Feb 26:13(3):. doi: 10.3390/dj13030102. Epub 2025 Feb 26     [PubMed PMID: 40136730]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[41]

Mamoun JS. The maxillary molar endodontic access opening: A microscope-based approach. European journal of dentistry. 2016 Jul-Sep:10(3):439-446. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.184153. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 27403069]

[42]

Jain P, Patni P, Hiremath H, Jain N. Successful removal of a 16 mm long pulp stone using ultrasonic tips from maxillary left first molar and its endodontic management. Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. 2014 Jan:17(1):92-5. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.124170. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 24554871]

[43]

Shabbir J, Zehra T, Najmi N, Hasan A, Naz M, Piasecki L, Azim AA. Access Cavity Preparations: Classification and Literature Review of Traditional and Minimally Invasive Endodontic Access Cavity Designs. Journal of endodontics. 2021 Aug:47(8):1229-1244. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.05.007. Epub 2021 May 28     [PubMed PMID: 34058252]

[44]

Kamburoğlu K, Sönmez G, Koç C, Yılmaz F, Tunç O, Isayev A. Access Cavity Preparation and Localization of Root Canals Using Guides in 3D-Printed Teeth with Calcified Root Canals: An In Vitro CBCT Study. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2023 Jun 29:13(13):. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13132215. Epub 2023 Jun 29     [PubMed PMID: 37443609]

[45]

Pawar AM, Singh S. New classification for pulp chamber floor anatomy of human molars. Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. 2020 Sep-Oct:23(5):430-435. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_477_20. Epub 2021 Feb 10     [PubMed PMID: 33911348]

[46]

Faraj BM. Estimation Accuracy of Root Canal Curvatures from Different Dental Diagnostic Imaging Techniques: An In Vitro Experimental Study. BioMed research international. 2021:2021():6699635. doi: 10.1155/2021/6699635. Epub 2021 Jan 13     [PubMed PMID: 33511210]

[47]

Kapetanaki I, Dimopoulos F, Gogos C. Traditional and minimally invasive access cavities in endodontics: a literature review. Restorative dentistry & endodontics. 2021 Aug:46(3):e46. doi: 10.5395/rde.2021.46.e46. Epub 2021 Aug 13     [PubMed PMID: 34513652]

[48]

Warreth A. Dental Caries and Its Management. International journal of dentistry. 2023:2023():9365845. doi: 10.1155/2023/9365845. Epub 2023 Jan 3     [PubMed PMID: 36636170]

[49]

Zanza A, Reda R, Testarelli L. Endodontic Orthograde Retreatments: Challenges and Solutions. Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dentistry. 2023:15():245-265. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S397835. Epub 2023 Oct 24     [PubMed PMID: 37899987]

[50]

Sharif MO, Merry A, Catleugh M, Tickle M, Brunton P, Dunne SM, Aggarwal VR, Chong LY. Replacement versus repair of defective restorations in adults: amalgam. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2014 Feb 8:2014(2):CD005970. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005970.pub3. Epub 2014 Feb 8     [PubMed PMID: 24510713]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[51]

Hilton TJ. Keys to clinical success with pulp capping: a review of the literature. Operative dentistry. 2009 Sep-Oct:34(5):615-25. doi: 10.2341/09-132-0. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 19830978]

[52]

Liu Y, Huang X, Ke H, Song X, Huang X, Sun S. Influence of Access Cavities on Maxillary Central Incisor Fracture Resistance: Finite Element Study. International dental journal. 2024 Dec:74(6):1248-1257. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2024.04.017. Epub 2024 May 1     [PubMed PMID: 38692963]

[53]

Li K, Xie B, Chen J, He Y. Breakage and displacement of the high-speed hand-piece bur during impacted mandibular third molar extraction: three cases. BMC oral health. 2022 Jun 6:22(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02253-8. Epub 2022 Jun 6     [PubMed PMID: 35668519]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[54]

Falcon PA, Falcon CY, Abbasi F, Hirschberg CS. Chamberless Endodontic Access for Treatment of Calcified Anterior Central Incisors. Journal of endodontics. 2021 Feb:47(2):322-326. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.10.017. Epub 2020 Oct 28     [PubMed PMID: 33129898]

[55]

Chaniotis A, Ordinola-Zapata R. Present status and future directions: Management of curved and calcified root canals. International endodontic journal. 2022 May:55 Suppl 3():656-684. doi: 10.1111/iej.13685. Epub 2022 Feb 27     [PubMed PMID: 35106792]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[56]

Lara-Mendes STO, Barbosa CFM, Machado VC, Santa-Rosa CC. A New Approach for Minimally Invasive Access to Severely Calcified Anterior Teeth Using the Guided Endodontics Technique. Journal of endodontics. 2018 Oct:44(10):1578-1582. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Aug 25     [PubMed PMID: 30154005]

[57]

Chugal N, Mallya SM, Kahler B, Lin LM. Endodontic Treatment Outcomes. Dental clinics of North America. 2017 Jan:61(1):59-80. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2016.08.009. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 27912819]

[58]

Shafiei F, Tavangar MS. Pre-Sealing of Endodontic Access Cavities for the Preservation of Anterior Teeth Fracture Resistance. Clinical and experimental dental research. 2024 Aug:10(4):e936. doi: 10.1002/cre2.936. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 39016080]

[59]

Gambarini G, Galli M, Morese A, Stefanelli LV, Abduljabbar F, Giovarruscio M, Di Nardo D, Seracchiani M, Testarelli L. Precision of Dynamic Navigation to Perform Endodontic Ultraconservative Access Cavities: A Preliminary In Vitro Analysis. Journal of endodontics. 2020 Sep:46(9):1286-1290. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.05.022. Epub 2020 Jun 15     [PubMed PMID: 32553875]

[60]

Nair PN. On the causes of persistent apical periodontitis: a review. International endodontic journal. 2006 Apr:39(4):249-81     [PubMed PMID: 16584489]

[61]

Silva EJNL, Rover G, Belladonna FG, De-Deus G, da Silveira Teixeira C, da Silva Fidalgo TK. Impact of contracted endodontic cavities on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth: a systematic review of in vitro studies. Clinical oral investigations. 2018 Jan:22(1):109-118. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2268-y. Epub 2017 Nov 3     [PubMed PMID: 29101548]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[62]

von Arx T, Walker WA 3rd. Microsurgical instruments for root-end cavity preparation following apicoectomy: a literature review. Endodontics & dental traumatology. 2000 Apr:16(2):47-62     [PubMed PMID: 11202858]

[63]

Neelakantan P, Vishwanath V, Taschieri S, Corbella S. Present status and future directions: Minimally invasive root canal preparation and periradicular surgery. International endodontic journal. 2022 Oct:55 Suppl 4():845-871. doi: 10.1111/iej.13750. Epub 2022 Apr 29     [PubMed PMID: 35426157]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[64]

Balaji SM. Embracing Structural Competency in Current Dental Research for Future Equitable Oral Healthcare Delivery in India. Indian journal of dental research : official publication of Indian Society for Dental Research. 2024 Oct 1:35(4):373. doi: 10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_159_25. Epub 2025 Mar 29     [PubMed PMID: 40156527]

[65]

Moreno-Rabié C, Torres A, Lambrechts P, Jacobs R. Clinical applications, accuracy and limitations of guided endodontics: a systematic review. International endodontic journal. 2020 Feb:53(2):214-231. doi: 10.1111/iej.13216. Epub 2019 Oct 23     [PubMed PMID: 31520416]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[66]

Varghese VS, George JV, Mathew S, Nagaraja S, Indiresha HN, Madhu KS. Cone beam computed tomographic evaluation of two access cavity designs and instrumentation on the thickness of peri-cervical dentin in mandibular anterior teeth. Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. 2016 Sep-Oct:19(5):450-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.190018. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 27656065]

[67]

Galal DY, Nawar NN, Abou El Seoud M, Saber SM, Kim HC. Options for Access Cavity Designs of Mandibular Incisors: Mechanical Aspects from Finite Element Study. Journal of endodontics. 2023 Dec:49(12):1706-1712. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2023.09.012. Epub 2023 Oct 4     [PubMed PMID: 37802135]

[68]

Hildebrand H, Leontiev W, Krastl G, Weiger R, Dagassan-Berndt D, Bürklein S, Connert T. Guided endodontics versus conventional access cavity preparation: an ex vivo comparative study of substance loss. BMC oral health. 2023 Oct 4:23(1):713. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03436-7. Epub 2023 Oct 4     [PubMed PMID: 37794361]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[69]

Silva EJNL, De-Deus G, Souza EM, Belladonna FG, Cavalcante DM, Simões-Carvalho M, Versiani MA. Present status and future directions - Minimal endodontic access cavities. International endodontic journal. 2022 May:55 Suppl 3():531-587. doi: 10.1111/iej.13696. Epub 2022 Feb 20     [PubMed PMID: 35100441]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[70]

Langaliya AK, Parmar G, Panchal D, Thakkar J, Shah J, Patel R. Comparative Evaluation of Different Endodontic Access Cavity Designs with Different Burs-An in vitro Experimental Insight into the Aspect of Fracture Resistance. Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences. 2024 Feb:16(Suppl 1):S821-S824. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1038_23. Epub 2023 Dec 20     [PubMed PMID: 38595593]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[71]

Nawar NN, Abdelfattah RA, Kataia M, Saber SM, Kataia EM, Kim HC. Effect of Proximal Caries-driven Access on the Biomechanical Behavior of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Premolars. Journal of endodontics. 2023 Oct:49(10):1337-1343. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2023.07.022. Epub 2023 Jul 28     [PubMed PMID: 37517584]

[72]

Dioguardi M, La Notte D, Sovereto D, Quarta C, Martella A, Ballini A. Influence of Cavity Designs on Fracture Resistance: Analysis of the Role of Different Access Techniques to the Endodontic Cavity in the Onset of Fractures: Narrative Review. TheScientificWorldJournal. 2024:2024():1648011. doi: 10.1155/2024/1648011. Epub 2024 Jul 30     [PubMed PMID: 39109329]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[73]

Farronato M, Torres A, Pedano MS, Jacobs R. Novel method for augmented reality guided endodontics: An in vitro study. Journal of dentistry. 2023 May:132():104476. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104476. Epub 2023 Mar 9     [PubMed PMID: 36905949]

[74]

Chen C, Wang FS, Zhang R, Bian Z, Meng LY. [An in vitro model study of computer-guided endodontic microsurgery]. Zhonghua kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Zhonghua kouqiang yixue zazhi = Chinese journal of stomatology. 2022 Jan 9:57(1):44-51. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20210928-00443. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 35012251]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[75]

Huth KC, Borkowski L, Liebermann A, Berlinghoff F, Hickel R, Schwendicke F, Reymus M. Comparing accuracy in guided endodontics: dynamic real-time navigation, static guides, and manual approaches for access cavity preparation - an in vitro study using 3D printed teeth. Clinical oral investigations. 2024 Mar 14:28(4):212. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05603-8. Epub 2024 Mar 14     [PubMed PMID: 38480541]

[76]

Fornara R, Pisano M, Salvati G, Malvicini G, Iandolo A, Gaeta C. Management of Calcified Canals with a New Type of Endodontic Static Guide: A Case Report. Dentistry journal. 2024 Jun 3:12(6):. doi: 10.3390/dj12060166. Epub 2024 Jun 3     [PubMed PMID: 38920867]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[77]

Langaliya A, Kritika S, Shah A, Shah J, Mahalaxmi S. Does dynamic navigation system preserve more dentine? - A systematic review. BMC oral health. 2024 Jun 10:24(1):678. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04450-z. Epub 2024 Jun 10     [PubMed PMID: 38858636]

Level 1 (high-level) evidence

[78]

Elhakim A, Hwang J, Kim S, Kim E, Kang S. Three-dimensional accuracy of endodontic access preparations using novel nonrestrictive static guides: A laboratory study. Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc. 2023 Dec:49(3):631-640. doi: 10.1111/aej.12792. Epub 2023 Sep 12     [PubMed PMID: 37697890]

[79]

Buchgreitz J, Buchgreitz M, Bjørndal L. Guided Endodontics Modified for Treating Molars by Using an Intracoronal Guide Technique. Journal of endodontics. 2019 Jun:45(6):818-823. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 May 3     [PubMed PMID: 31056301]

[80]

Ali A, Arslan H. Effectiveness of the static-guided endodontic technique for accessing the root canal through MTA and its effect on fracture strength. Clinical oral investigations. 2021 Apr:25(4):1989-1995. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03507-x. Epub 2020 Aug 10     [PubMed PMID: 32779012]

[81]

Buchgreitz J, Buchgreitz M, Bjørndal L. Guided root canal preparation using cone beam computed tomography and optical surface scans - an observational study of pulp space obliteration and drill path depth in 50 patients. International endodontic journal. 2019 May:52(5):559-568. doi: 10.1111/iej.13038. Epub 2018 Nov 26     [PubMed PMID: 30406949]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[82]

Connert T, Leontiev W, Dagassan-Berndt D, Kühl S, ElAyouti A, Krug R, Krastl G, Weiger R. Real-Time Guided Endodontics with a Miniaturized Dynamic Navigation System Versus Conventional Freehand Endodontic Access Cavity Preparation: Substance Loss and Procedure Time. Journal of endodontics. 2021 Oct:47(10):1651-1656. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2021.07.012. Epub 2021 Jul 24     [PubMed PMID: 34310979]

[83]

Valverde Haro HP, Quille Punina LG, Erazo Conde AD. Guided Endodontic Treatment of Mandibular Incisor with Pulp Canal Obliteration following Dental Trauma: A Case Report. Iranian endodontic journal. 2024:19(3):223-227. doi: 10.22037/iej.v19i3.45123. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 39086708]

Level 3 (low-level) evidence

[84]

Gao Y, Wang L, Fu Y, Yang F, Zhang L, Huang D. Minimally invasive treatment of calcified root canals in anterior teeth with digital guide technique. Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology. 2022 Jan 25:40(1):111-122. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2022.01.017. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 38597002]

Level 2 (mid-level) evidence

[85]

Connert T, Zehnder MS, Amato M, Weiger R, Kühl S, Krastl G. Microguided Endodontics: a method to achieve minimally invasive access cavity preparation and root canal location in mandibular incisors using a novel computer-guided technique. International endodontic journal. 2018 Feb:51(2):247-255. doi: 10.1111/iej.12809. Epub 2017 Aug 3     [PubMed PMID: 28665514]

[86]

Krastl G, Zehnder MS, Connert T, Weiger R, Kühl S. Guided Endodontics: a novel treatment approach for teeth with pulp canal calcification and apical pathology. Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology. 2016 Jun:32(3):240-246. doi: 10.1111/edt.12235. Epub 2015 Oct 8     [PubMed PMID: 26449290]

[87]

Stefanelli LV, DeGroot BS, Lipton DI, Mandelaris GA. Accuracy of a Dynamic Dental Implant Navigation System in a Private Practice. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. 2019 January/February:34(1):205–213. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6966. Epub 2018 Dec 5     [PubMed PMID: 30521660]

[88]

Block MS, Emery RW. Static or Dynamic Navigation for Implant Placement-Choosing the Method of Guidance. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2016 Feb:74(2):269-77. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.022. Epub 2015 Sep 30     [PubMed PMID: 26452429]

[89]

Chen CK, Yuh DY, Huang RY, Fu E, Tsai CF, Chiang CY. Accuracy of Implant Placement with a Navigation System, a Laboratory Guide, and Freehand Drilling. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants. 2018 Nov/Dec:33(6):1213-1218. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6585. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30427951]

[90]

Casap N, Wexler A, Persky N, Schneider A, Lustmann J. Navigation surgery for dental implants: assessment of accuracy of the image guided implantology system. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2004 Sep:62(9 Suppl 2):116-9     [PubMed PMID: 15332188]

[91]

Torres A, Boelen GJ, Lambrechts P, Pedano MS, Jacobs R. Dynamic navigation: a laboratory study on the accuracy and potential use of guided root canal treatment. International endodontic journal. 2021 Sep:54(9):1659-1667. doi: 10.1111/iej.13563. Epub 2021 Jun 12     [PubMed PMID: 33991122]

[92]

Dianat O, Nosrat A, Tordik PA, Aldahmash SA, Romberg E, Price JB, Mostoufi B. Accuracy and Efficiency of a Dynamic Navigation System for Locating Calcified Canals. Journal of endodontics. 2020 Nov:46(11):1719-1725. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.07.014. Epub 2020 Jul 18     [PubMed PMID: 32692993]

[93]

Block MS, Emery RW, Cullum DR, Sheikh A. Implant Placement Is More Accurate Using Dynamic Navigation. Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 2017 Jul:75(7):1377-1386. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2017.02.026. Epub 2017 Mar 14     [PubMed PMID: 28384461]

[94]

Jain SD, Carrico CK, Bermanis I. 3-Dimensional Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation Technology in Locating Calcified Canals. Journal of endodontics. 2020 Jun:46(6):839-845. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.03.014. Epub 2020 Apr 25     [PubMed PMID: 32340763]

[95]

Chong BS, Dhesi M, Makdissi J. Computer-aided dynamic navigation: a novel method for guided endodontics. Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985). 2019:50(3):196-202. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a41921. Epub     [PubMed PMID: 30773571]

[96]

Dianat O, Gupta S, Price JB, Mostoufi B. Guided Endodontic Access in a Maxillary Molar Using a Dynamic Navigation System. Journal of endodontics. 2021 Apr:47(4):658-662. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.09.019. Epub 2020 Oct 9     [PubMed PMID: 33045269]